The influence of item sampling on sex differences in knowledge tests
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. P. McDonald,et al. Test Theory: A Unified Treatment , 1999 .
[2] S. Blinkhorn. 3.11 News & Views 031 CDS , 2005 .
[3] Edward H. Haertel,et al. Generalizability Analysis for Performance Assessments of Student Achievement or School Effectiveness , 1997 .
[4] Ulrich Schroeders,et al. Equivalence of Reading and Listening Comprehension Across Test Media , 2011 .
[5] P. Ackerman,et al. The locus of adult intelligence: knowledge, abilities, and nonability traits. , 1999, Psychology and aging.
[6] Martin Schultze,et al. Following the Ants: Development of Short Scales for Proactive Personality and Supervisor Support by Ant Colony Optimization , 2017 .
[7] Oliver Wilhelm,et al. Methods matter: Testing competing models for designing short-scale Big-Five assessments , 2015 .
[8] R. Vandenberg,et al. A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .
[9] Moritz Heene,et al. Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices. , 2011, Psychological methods.
[10] Janet Shibley Hyde,et al. Gender similarities and differences. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.
[11] P. Ackerman,et al. Assessing individual differences in knowledge: Knowledge, intelligence, and related traits. , 1999 .
[12] J. Deneubourg,et al. The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the argentine ant , 1990, Journal of Insect Behavior.
[13] Michael T. Kane,et al. Inferences about variance components and reliability-generalizability coefficients in the absence of random sampling. , 2002 .
[14] Keith F Widaman,et al. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.
[15] John L. Horn,et al. Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gc theory. , 1997 .
[16] Gayle S. Christensen,et al. Where immigrant students succeed: A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003 , 2006 .
[17] J. Deneubourg,et al. Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine ant , 1989, Naturwissenschaften.
[18] R. Bagozzi,et al. On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. , 2000, Psychological methods.
[19] R. Sternberg,et al. Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. , 1996 .
[20] D. Halpern. Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .
[21] Jasmin Divers,et al. Coefficient Omega Bootstrap Confidence Intervals , 2013 .
[22] Janet Shibley Hyde,et al. Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.
[23] Patrick Ian Armstrong,et al. Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.
[24] W. G. Cochran. The combination of estimates from different experiments. , 1954 .
[25] Yves Rosseel,et al. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .
[26] L. Cronbach,et al. Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.
[27] Alija Kulenović,et al. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .
[28] Wolfgang Viechtbauer,et al. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package , 2010 .
[29] P. Ackerman. A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge , 1996 .
[30] M. Linn,et al. Gender Similarities in Mathematics and Science , 2006, Science.
[31] Margaret Wu,et al. Measurement, Sampling, and Equating Errors in Large‐Scale Assessments , 2010 .
[32] Andrew N. Christopher,et al. Approaches to learning and the acquisition of general knowledge , 2007 .
[33] J. Margraf-Stiksrud,et al. Gender differences on general knowledge tests: Are they due to Differential Item Functioning? , 2015 .
[34] Stephen Camarata,et al. Sex differences in processing speed: Developmental effects in males and females , 2006 .
[35] Paul Irwing,et al. Sex differences in general knowledge , 2001 .
[36] P. Ackerman,et al. Intelligence, Personality, and Interests in the Career Choice Process , 2003 .
[37] Ulrich Schroeders,et al. On the nature of crystallized intelligence: the relationship between verbal ability and factual knowledge☆ , 2014 .
[38] Matthias von Davier,et al. International Large-Scale Assessment Data , 2010 .
[39] P. Ackerman,et al. Education and g , 2003 .
[40] R. P. McDonald,et al. Behavior Domains in Theory and in Practice , 2003 .
[41] C. Reynolds,et al. Bias in Psychological Assessment: An Empirical Review and Recommendations , 2003 .
[42] Ke-Hai Yuan,et al. Robust Coefficients Alpha and Omega and Confidence Intervals With Outlying Observations and Missing Data , 2016, Educational and psychological measurement.
[43] William Stout,et al. A model-based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF , 1993 .
[44] J. Wicherts. Group differences in intelligence test performance , 2002 .
[45] Walter L Leite,et al. Item Selection for the Development of Short Forms of Scales Using an Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm , 2008, Multivariate behavioral research.
[46] Diane F. Halpern,et al. The Smarter Sex: A Critical Review of Sex Differences in Intelligence , 2000 .
[47] William Revelle,et al. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ωH: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability , 2005 .
[48] John C. Brantley,et al. Woodcock-Johnson psycho-Educational battery: Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. Hingham, MA: Teaching resources, 1977. $92.50 , 1981 .
[49] P. Ackerman,et al. Determinants of health knowledge: an investigation of age, gender, abilities, personality, and interests. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[50] Susan M. Barnett. Complex Questions Rarely Have Simple Answers , 2007, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.
[51] G. Hancock,et al. Performance of Bootstrapping Approaches to Model Test Statistics and Parameter Standard Error Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling , 2001 .
[52] Gordon W. Cheung,et al. Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .
[53] J. Hyde,et al. The Gender Similarities Hypothesis , 2005 .
[54] Diane F. Halpern,et al. A Cognitive-Process Taxonomy for Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 2004 .
[55] J. Divers,et al. Bootstrap Interval Estimation of Reliability via Coefficient Omega , 2013 .
[56] W. Haenszel,et al. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[57] O. Wilhelm,et al. Pitfalls and Challenges in Constructing Short Forms of Cognitive Ability Measures , 2014 .
[58] Christoph Kemper,et al. Short Scales – Five Misunderstandings and Ways to Overcome Them , 2014 .
[59] E. Fennema,et al. Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.
[60] Neil J. Dorans,et al. Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. , 1986 .
[61] D. Altman,et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[62] J. Loevinger,et al. PERSON AND POPULATION AS PSYCHOMETRIC CONCEPTS. , 1965, Psychological review.
[63] Steven J. Osterlind,et al. Differential Item Functioning , 2009, Item Response Theory.
[64] J. Margraf-Stiksrud,et al. Sex differences in general knowledge in German high school students , 2004 .
[65] G. Cumming. Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis , 2011 .
[66] T. Keith,et al. Sex differences in latent cognitive abilities ages 6 to 59: Evidence from the Woodcock–Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities , 2008 .
[67] André Beauducel,et al. On the Performance of Maximum Likelihood Versus Means and Variance Adjusted Weighted Least Squares Estimation in CFA , 2006 .
[68] P. Bentler,et al. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .
[69] Barbara M Byrne,et al. Measurement equivalence: a comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.
[70] U. Lindenberger,et al. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Aging Neuroscience Hundred Days of Cognitive Training Enhance Broad Cognitive Abilities in Adulthood: Findings from the Cogito Study Materials and Methods Participants and Procedure , 2022 .
[71] Gideon J. Mellenbergh,et al. Measurement precision in test score and item response models , 1996 .
[72] D. Borsboom,et al. Intelligence Is What the Intelligence Test Measures. Seriously , 2014 .
[73] Klaas Sijtsma,et al. On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review , 2013 .
[74] Eric D. Heggestad,et al. Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.
[75] Denny Borsboom,et al. Frontiers of Test Validity Theory: Measurement, Causation, and Meaning , 2013 .
[76] C. Lance,et al. The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria , 2006 .
[77] Phillip L. Ackerman,et al. Determinants of Individual Differences and Gender Differences in Knowledge. , 2001 .
[78] P. Ackerman,et al. Investment and intellect: a review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.
[79] D. Treiman,et al. A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status , 1992 .
[80] Heinz-Martin Süß,et al. Interindividuelle Unterschiede im typischen intellektuellen Engagement , 2003 .
[81] K. Böhme,et al. Typical intellectual engagement and achievement in math and the sciences in secondary education , 2015 .
[82] Thomas Stützle,et al. Ant Colony Optimization: Overview and Recent Advances , 2018, Handbook of Metaheuristics.
[83] Paul Irwing,et al. Sex differences in means and variability on the progressive matrices in university students: a meta-analysis. , 2005, British journal of psychology.
[84] H.L.J. van der Maas,et al. A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. , 2006, Psychological review.
[85] J. Allik,et al. Sex differences on the progressive matrices among adolescents: some data from Estonia , 2004 .
[86] D. Geary,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics , 2022 .