The influence of item sampling on sex differences in knowledge tests

[1]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Test Theory: A Unified Treatment , 1999 .

[2]  S. Blinkhorn 3.11 News & Views 031 CDS , 2005 .

[3]  Edward H. Haertel,et al.  Generalizability Analysis for Performance Assessments of Student Achievement or School Effectiveness , 1997 .

[4]  Ulrich Schroeders,et al.  Equivalence of Reading and Listening Comprehension Across Test Media , 2011 .

[5]  P. Ackerman,et al.  The locus of adult intelligence: knowledge, abilities, and nonability traits. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[6]  Martin Schultze,et al.  Following the Ants: Development of Short Scales for Proactive Personality and Supervisor Support by Ant Colony Optimization , 2017 .

[7]  Oliver Wilhelm,et al.  Methods matter: Testing competing models for designing short-scale Big-Five assessments , 2015 .

[8]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[9]  Moritz Heene,et al.  Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[10]  Janet Shibley Hyde,et al.  Gender similarities and differences. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Assessing individual differences in knowledge: Knowledge, intelligence, and related traits. , 1999 .

[12]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the argentine ant , 1990, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[13]  Michael T. Kane,et al.  Inferences about variance components and reliability-generalizability coefficients in the absence of random sampling. , 2002 .

[14]  Keith F Widaman,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  John L. Horn,et al.  Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gc theory. , 1997 .

[16]  Gayle S. Christensen,et al.  Where immigrant students succeed: A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003 , 2006 .

[17]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine ant , 1989, Naturwissenschaften.

[18]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[19]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. , 1996 .

[20]  D. Halpern Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[21]  Jasmin Divers,et al.  Coefficient Omega Bootstrap Confidence Intervals , 2013 .

[22]  Janet Shibley Hyde,et al.  Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Patrick Ian Armstrong,et al.  Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  W. G. Cochran The combination of estimates from different experiments. , 1954 .

[25]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[26]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[28]  Wolfgang Viechtbauer,et al.  Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package , 2010 .

[29]  P. Ackerman A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge , 1996 .

[30]  M. Linn,et al.  Gender Similarities in Mathematics and Science , 2006, Science.

[31]  Margaret Wu,et al.  Measurement, Sampling, and Equating Errors in Large‐Scale Assessments , 2010 .

[32]  Andrew N. Christopher,et al.  Approaches to learning and the acquisition of general knowledge , 2007 .

[33]  J. Margraf-Stiksrud,et al.  Gender differences on general knowledge tests: Are they due to Differential Item Functioning? , 2015 .

[34]  Stephen Camarata,et al.  Sex differences in processing speed: Developmental effects in males and females , 2006 .

[35]  Paul Irwing,et al.  Sex differences in general knowledge , 2001 .

[36]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Intelligence, Personality, and Interests in the Career Choice Process , 2003 .

[37]  Ulrich Schroeders,et al.  On the nature of crystallized intelligence: the relationship between verbal ability and factual knowledge☆ , 2014 .

[38]  Matthias von Davier,et al.  International Large-Scale Assessment Data , 2010 .

[39]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Education and g , 2003 .

[40]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Behavior Domains in Theory and in Practice , 2003 .

[41]  C. Reynolds,et al.  Bias in Psychological Assessment: An Empirical Review and Recommendations , 2003 .

[42]  Ke-Hai Yuan,et al.  Robust Coefficients Alpha and Omega and Confidence Intervals With Outlying Observations and Missing Data , 2016, Educational and psychological measurement.

[43]  William Stout,et al.  A model-based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF , 1993 .

[44]  J. Wicherts Group differences in intelligence test performance , 2002 .

[45]  Walter L Leite,et al.  Item Selection for the Development of Short Forms of Scales Using an Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm , 2008, Multivariate behavioral research.

[46]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  The Smarter Sex: A Critical Review of Sex Differences in Intelligence , 2000 .

[47]  William Revelle,et al.  Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ωH: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability , 2005 .

[48]  John C. Brantley,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson psycho-Educational battery: Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. Hingham, MA: Teaching resources, 1977. $92.50 , 1981 .

[49]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Determinants of health knowledge: an investigation of age, gender, abilities, personality, and interests. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  Susan M. Barnett Complex Questions Rarely Have Simple Answers , 2007, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[51]  G. Hancock,et al.  Performance of Bootstrapping Approaches to Model Test Statistics and Parameter Standard Error Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling , 2001 .

[52]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[53]  J. Hyde,et al.  The Gender Similarities Hypothesis , 2005 .

[54]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  A Cognitive-Process Taxonomy for Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 2004 .

[55]  J. Divers,et al.  Bootstrap Interval Estimation of Reliability via Coefficient Omega , 2013 .

[56]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[57]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  Pitfalls and Challenges in Constructing Short Forms of Cognitive Ability Measures , 2014 .

[58]  Christoph Kemper,et al.  Short Scales – Five Misunderstandings and Ways to Overcome Them , 2014 .

[59]  E. Fennema,et al.  Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  Neil J. Dorans,et al.  Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. , 1986 .

[61]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[62]  J. Loevinger,et al.  PERSON AND POPULATION AS PSYCHOMETRIC CONCEPTS. , 1965, Psychological review.

[63]  Steven J. Osterlind,et al.  Differential Item Functioning , 2009, Item Response Theory.

[64]  J. Margraf-Stiksrud,et al.  Sex differences in general knowledge in German high school students , 2004 .

[65]  G. Cumming Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[66]  T. Keith,et al.  Sex differences in latent cognitive abilities ages 6 to 59: Evidence from the Woodcock–Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities , 2008 .

[67]  André Beauducel,et al.  On the Performance of Maximum Likelihood Versus Means and Variance Adjusted Weighted Least Squares Estimation in CFA , 2006 .

[68]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[69]  Barbara M Byrne,et al.  Measurement equivalence: a comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Aging Neuroscience Hundred Days of Cognitive Training Enhance Broad Cognitive Abilities in Adulthood: Findings from the Cogito Study Materials and Methods Participants and Procedure , 2022 .

[71]  Gideon J. Mellenbergh,et al.  Measurement precision in test score and item response models , 1996 .

[72]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Intelligence Is What the Intelligence Test Measures. Seriously , 2014 .

[73]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review , 2013 .

[74]  Eric D. Heggestad,et al.  Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[75]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  Frontiers of Test Validity Theory: Measurement, Causation, and Meaning , 2013 .

[76]  C. Lance,et al.  The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria , 2006 .

[77]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  Determinants of Individual Differences and Gender Differences in Knowledge. , 2001 .

[78]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Investment and intellect: a review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[79]  D. Treiman,et al.  A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status , 1992 .

[80]  Heinz-Martin Süß,et al.  Interindividuelle Unterschiede im typischen intellektuellen Engagement , 2003 .

[81]  K. Böhme,et al.  Typical intellectual engagement and achievement in math and the sciences in secondary education , 2015 .

[82]  Thomas Stützle,et al.  Ant Colony Optimization: Overview and Recent Advances , 2018, Handbook of Metaheuristics.

[83]  Paul Irwing,et al.  Sex differences in means and variability on the progressive matrices in university students: a meta-analysis. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[84]  H.L.J. van der Maas,et al.  A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. , 2006, Psychological review.

[85]  J. Allik,et al.  Sex differences on the progressive matrices among adolescents: some data from Estonia , 2004 .

[86]  D. Geary,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics , 2022 .