Building Failure Consequences

The consequences of structural failures (caused by an accidental action) typically come in several forms: for example fatalities, injuries, structural damage, damage to contents, loss of functionality and environmental damage. When considering structural failures these consequences are often divided into two categories, direct and indirect consequences. The type of consequences considered, and whether they are considered direct or indirect consequences, is dependent on the system boundaries. These should be defined clearly at the onset of any consequence analysis. Once the direct and indirect consequences are identified and quantified these values could be used to assess a structure’s robustness, for example following the risk-based definition for this attribute suggested by Baker (2008). The consequences of failure vary significantly from structure to structure, and may depend on a wide range of factors, including:  Nature of the hazard;  Properties of the structure;

[1]  Haresh C. Shah,et al.  Engineering role in failure cost evaluation for buildings , 1997 .

[2]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター,et al.  The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government , 2003 .

[3]  R. Waxweiler,et al.  Physical injuries and fatalities resulting from the Oklahoma City bombing. , 1996, JAMA.

[4]  Michael Havbro Faber,et al.  Robustness: Theoretical Framework , 2010 .

[5]  Michael Havbro Faber,et al.  Failure consequences and reliability acceptance criteria for exceptional building structures: A study taking basis in the failure of the World Trade Center Twin Towers , 2004 .

[6]  Michael Havbro Faber Nielsen Consequence assessment in earthquake risk management using damage indicators , 2005 .

[7]  A.C.W.M. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  The Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS) , 1991 .

[8]  Giovanna Cultrera,et al.  EARTHQUAKE LOSS ESTIMATION AND MITIGATION IN EUROPE : A REVIEW AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES , 2008 .

[9]  C. V. Anderson,et al.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , 2002 .

[10]  Carl-Alexander Graubner,et al.  Eurocode 0 - Grundlagen der Tragwerksplanung / Eurocode 0 - basis of structural design , 2011 .

[11]  L. Phillips,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis: a manual , 2009 .

[12]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Multi-Criteria Analyse , 1991 .

[13]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Risk assessment for civil engineering facilities: critical overview and discussion , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  M. H. Faber,et al.  Consequence assessment in earthquake risk management using indicators , 2006 .

[15]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  On the assessment of robustness , 2008 .

[16]  Fiona Cobb,et al.  Structural Engineer's Pocket Book , 2004 .

[17]  Risk Assessment in Engineering , 2009 .

[18]  K. Pitilakis,et al.  Earthquake Disaster Scenario Prediction and Loss Modelling for Urban Areas , 2007 .

[19]  Michael Havbro Faber,et al.  Proceedings of the Joint Workshop of COST Actions TU0601 and E55 , 2010 .

[20]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The value of statistical life in road safety: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  A. W. Coburn Factors determining human casualty levels in earthquakes : Motality prediction in building collapse , 1992 .

[22]  Ross B. Corotis,et al.  Failure cost design of structural systems , 1988 .

[23]  Albrecht Lentz,et al.  Loss-of-Life Modelling in Risk Acceptance Criteria , 2004 .