Establishment of a network-based intra-hospital virtual cancer biobank.

There is a growing interest in integrating biomaterial repositories into larger infrastructures in order to meet research demands. However, even for a single hospital or institute, where both population-based and multiple disease-based biobanks have existed for a long time, the integration of existing separate biobanks into a virtual cancer biobank is still challenging. The guidelines and procedures for biobanking are varied and not universally enforced or followed in separate biobanks. Within the last 2 years, we initiated a project to establish a centralized biobank facility in a common storage environment. Analyzing the challenges and interests of stakeholders for the biobanks, a working group comprised of representatives from the central and separate banks, ethic committees, and research administration offices reached an agreement to implement a central facility by following the ISBER best practices for biobanking, and including regular project reviews by the ethical and scientific boards. Furthermore, by implementing a modified minimum information system with biobank data sharing, a network based intra-hospital virtual cancer bank was established to facilitate sharing information of samples held by separate banks. Meanwhile, this virtual biobank network, which has integrated patient information from hospital health care systems, will gradually integrate follow-up information from the cancer registry office and data from epidemiology studies, providing controlled access for sample providers and resource users. In the future, this infrastructure designed for a single hospital may be helpful for building a broader virtual network for data and specimen exchanges.

[1]  Philip R Quinlan,et al.  A data standard for sourcing fit-for-purpose biological samples in an integrated virtual network of biobanks. , 2014, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[2]  Jingjing Jiang,et al.  Clinical biobanks, from the world to China. , 2014, Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES.

[3]  Thomas G Schulze,et al.  How to design biospecimen identifiers and integrate relevant functionalities into your biospecimen management system. , 2014, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[4]  Qingli Hu,et al.  A Proposed Approach to Informed Consent for Biobanks in China , 2014, Bioethics.

[5]  Haidan Chen,et al.  Public perceptions of biobanks in China: a focus group study. , 2013, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[6]  J. Greenspan,et al.  Biobanking past, present and future: responsibilities and benefits. , 2013, AIDS.

[7]  M. Fransson,et al.  A Minimum Data Set for Sharing Biobank Samples, Information, and Data: MIABIS. , 2012, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[8]  Umberto Nanni,et al.  Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: review and implementation of the Sample PREanalytical Code (SPREC). , 2012, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[9]  David Cox,et al.  Toward a roadmap in global biobanking for health , 2012, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[10]  Roger Bjugn,et al.  Stakeholder analysis: a useful tool for biobank planning. , 2012, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[11]  G. Lauss,et al.  Biobank governance: heterogeneous modes of ordering and democratization , 2011, Journal of Community Genetics.

[12]  C. Compton,et al.  Stakeholder research on biospecimen needs and reactions to the development of a national cancer human biobank by the National Cancer Institute. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[13]  Catherine Waldby,et al.  National Biobanks: Clinical Labor, Risk Production, and the Creation of Biovalue , 2010, Science, technology & human values.

[14]  F. Betsou,et al.  Standard Preanalytical Coding for Biospecimens: Defining the Sample PREanalytical Code , 2010, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.