Using variance information in magnetoencephalography measures of functional connectivity

The use of magnetoencephalography (MEG) to assess long range functional connectivity across large scale distributed brain networks is gaining popularity. Recent work has shown that electrodynamic networks can be assessed using both seed based correlation or independent component analysis (ICA) applied to MEG data and further that such metrics agree with fMRI studies. To date, techniques for MEG connectivity assessment have typically used a variance normalised approach, either through the use of Pearson correlation coefficients or via variance normalisation of envelope timecourses prior to ICA. Here, we show that the use of variance information (i.e. data that have not been variance normalised) in source space projected Hilbert envelope time series yields important spatial information, and is of significant functional relevance. Further, we show that employing this information in functional connectivity analyses improves the spatial delineation of network nodes using both seed based and ICA approaches. The use of variance is particularly important in MEG since the non-independence of source space voxels (brought about by the ill-posed MEG inverse problem) means that spurious signals can exist in areas of low signal variance. We therefore suggest that this approach be incorporated into future studies.

[1]  P. F. Liddle,et al.  Task induced modulation of neural oscillations in electrophysiological brain networks , 2012, NeuroImage.

[2]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  R M Leahy,et al.  A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Controlling false positive rates in mass-multivariate tests for electromagnetic responses , 2011, NeuroImage.

[6]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Oliver Speck,et al.  MR-Encephalography: Fast multi-channel monitoring of brain physiology with magnetic resonance , 2007, NeuroImage.

[9]  Se Robinson,et al.  Functional neuroimaging by Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM) , 1999 .

[10]  L. Parkkonen,et al.  122-channel squid instrument for investigating the magnetic signals from the human brain , 1993 .

[11]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[12]  R. Hari,et al.  Functional Segregation of Movement-Related Rhythmic Activity in the Human Brain , 1995, NeuroImage.

[13]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  The effect of hypercapnia on resting and stimulus induced MEG signals , 2011, NeuroImage.

[14]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[15]  J Gross,et al.  REPRINTS , 1962, The Lancet.

[16]  David Poeppel,et al.  Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer source reconstruction technique in the presence of additive low-rank interference , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: Methodology and comparison with fcMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[18]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Inferring task-related networks using independent component analysis in magnetoencephalography , 2012, NeuroImage.

[19]  J. Vrba,et al.  Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. , 2001, Methods.

[20]  P. Morris,et al.  β‐Band correlates of the fMRI BOLD response , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[21]  K Sekihara,et al.  NUTMEG: a neuromagnetic source reconstruction toolbox. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[22]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  A novel adaptive beamformer for MEG source reconstruction effective when large background brain activities exist , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  W. Drongelen,et al.  A spatial filtering technique to detect and localize multiple sources in the brain , 1996, Brain Topography.

[24]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity in MEG: A multivariate approach insensitive to linear source leakage , 2012, NeuroImage.

[25]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  A general linear model for MEG beamformer imaging , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. Sarvas Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Darren Price,et al.  Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Large-scale spontaneous fluctuations and correlations in brain electrical activity observed with magnetoencephalography , 2010, NeuroImage.

[29]  Gary G. R. Green,et al.  Source stability index: A novel beamforming based localisation metric , 2010, NeuroImage.