Making sense during conversation: an fMRI study

Although language is thought of as a left hemisphere function, there is increasing evidence that the right hemisphere contributes to language processing by identifying the theme of spoken and written language. Using fMRI, we examined the role played by the right and left hemispheres in making sense of a conversation. When this process involves implicit appraisal of changes in the conversation's topic, the neural network has a right hemisphere bias and includes Broca's and Wernicke's areas, their right hemisphere homologues, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the cerebellum. When making sense of conversation involves appraisal of the conversation's reasoning, however, the network includes Broca's and Wernicke's areas. Thus, right and left hemisphere systems contribute uniquely to the linguistic skills involved in making sense of a conversation.

[1]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: an event-related fMRI study. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Event‐related fMRI study of response inhibition , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[3]  R. Dolan,et al.  Dissociation of Mechanisms Underlying Syllogistic Reasoning , 2000, NeuroImage.

[4]  Skye McDonald,et al.  Exploring the Cognitive Basis of Right-Hemisphere Pragmatic Language Disorders , 2000, Brain and Language.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Brain Mechanisms for Detecting Perceptual, Semantic, and Emotional Deviance , 2000, NeuroImage.

[6]  C. Price The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging , 2000, Journal of anatomy.

[7]  D. A. Robertson,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Cognitive Process of Mapping During Discourse Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[8]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior Cingulate and the Monitoring of Response Conflict: Evidence from an fMRI Study of Overt Verb Generation , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  J. Gore,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Study of Implicit Phrase-Level Syntactic and Semantic Processing , 1999, NeuroImage.

[11]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Creation and use of a Talairach‐compatible atlas for accurate, automated, nonlinear intersubject registration, and analysis of functional imaging data , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Neuroanatomical Correlates of Human Reasoning , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Beeman,et al.  Complementary Right- and Left-Hemisphere Language Comprehension , 1998 .

[16]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  J. Desmond,et al.  Neural Substrates of Fluid Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Neocortical Activation during Performance of the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  J. Binder,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for subcortical participation in conceptual reasoning skills , 1997, Neuroreport.

[19]  D. Lancker,et al.  Rags to Riches: Our Increasing Appreciation of Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of the Human Right Cerebral Hemisphere , 1997, Brain and Language.

[20]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Human Brain Language Areas Identified by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  P. Pietrini,et al.  Where the brain appreciates the moral of a story. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[22]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  H. Brownell,et al.  The use of pronoun anaphora and speaker mood in the interpretation of conversational utterances by right hemisphere brain-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[24]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Sensitivity to conversational deviance in right-hemisphere-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[25]  H. Gardner,et al.  The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks , 1990, Brain and Language.

[26]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[27]  H. Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording , 1989, Brain and Language.

[28]  Jean E. Newman,et al.  Making reference: The cohesive use of pronouns in the narrative discourse of hemidecorticate adolescents , 1986, Brain and Language.