Three-Dimensional Cerebral Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Venography at 3.0 Tesla: Initial Results Using Highly Accelerated Parallel Acquisition

Objective:The objective of this study was to evaluate a high spatial resolution 3-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (CE-MR) venography protocol for evaluation of intracranial venous system using highly accelerated parallel imaging at 3.0 T. Materials and Methods:Ten patients (4 male, 6 female; age, 38–76 years) with suspected cerebrovascular disease were prospectively studied on a 32-channel 3.0 T MR system. After a single intravenous contrast injection, high spatial resolution 3D CE-MR angiography of the entire supraaortic arteries was performed followed immediately by 3D cerebral CE-MR venography. By using a fast 3D gradient-recalled-echo sequence with elliptic centric k-space ordering and highly accelerated parallel acquisition (acceleration factor 3 and 2 in phase and slice encoding direction, respectively), 3D cerebral CE-MR venography was acquired with voxel dimensions of 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.8 mm3 in 24 seconds. Image evaluation was performed independently by 2 neuroradiologists for overall image quality, presence of noise, and artifacts. The image quality of 30 venous segments was evaluated in each subject using a 1 to 4 scoring scale. In 2 patients, catheter angiography was available for correlation. Statistical analysis of data was performed by using Wilcoxon rank sum test and kappa coefficient. Results:All studies were determined to be of diagnostic image quality by both observers. The majority (90%) of cerebral venous segments were evaluated to be of diagnostic image quality (median, 3; range, 3–4) by both readers and with excellent interobserver agreement (κ = 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.79–0.93). One meningioma invading the superior sagittal sinus and one superior sagittal sinus fistula were detected subsequently confirmed by conventional angiography. Conclusion:High spatial resolution 3D cerebral CE-MR venography is feasible and promising. Using a 32-channel 3.0 T system combined with multichannel array coils effectively supports highly accelerated parallel imaging, enabling subsequent acquisition of both high spatial resolution CE-MR angiography and CE-MR venography after a single contrast injection without impairing the image quality. More extensive clinical studies are warranted to establish the range of applications and confirm the accuracy of this technique.

[1]  Y. Shigematsu,et al.  Normal structures in the intracranial dural sinuses: delineation with 3D contrast-enhanced magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo imaging sequence. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Specific coil design for SENSE: A six‐element cardiac array , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  M. van Buchem,et al.  MR angiography of the intracranial venous system. , 2000, Radiology.

[6]  P. Nederkoorn,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. , 2003, Radiology.

[7]  J Paul Finn,et al.  Time-Resolved Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Head and Neck at 3.0 Tesla: Initial Results , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[8]  J. Chia,et al.  Cerebral MR venography in children: comparison of 2D time-of-flight and gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo techniques. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  Graham A Wright,et al.  Intracranial venous system: gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered sequence--initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[10]  M. R. Theobald,et al.  Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic pitfalls. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  J. R. Landis,et al.  An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. , 1977, Biometrics.

[12]  Jiongjiong Wang,et al.  Continuous ASL (CASL) perfusion MRI with an array coil and parallel imaging at 3T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Cardiac Steady-State Free Precession CINE Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Impact of Parallel Imaging Acceleration on Volumetric Accuracy and Signal Parameters , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[14]  S J Riederer,et al.  Improved centric phase encoding orders for three‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared mr angiography , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  S J Riederer,et al.  Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: application to the renal arteries. , 1997, Radiology.

[16]  S J Riederer,et al.  Theoretical limits of spatial resolution in elliptical‐centric contrast‐enhanced 3D‐MRA , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  J Paul Finn,et al.  High Spatial-Resolution CE-MRA of the Carotid Circulation With Parallel Imaging: Comparison of Image Quality Between 2 Different Acceleration Factors at 3.0 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[18]  Renxin Chu,et al.  Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 51:22–26 (2004) Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Parallel Imaging Performance of a 16-Channel Receive-Only Brain Coil Array at , 2022 .

[19]  R R Edelman,et al.  Cerebral venography with MR. , 1991, Radiology.

[20]  P. A. Rinck,et al.  Field strength and dose dependence of contrast enhancement by gadolinium-based MR contrast agents , 1999, European Radiology.

[21]  S J Riederer,et al.  Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with conventional angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[22]  S J Riederer,et al.  Performance of an elliptical centric view order for signal enhancement and motion artifact suppression in breath‐hold three‐dimensional gradient echo imaging , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.