Effects of Sideslip on the Aerodynamics of Low-Aspect-Ratio Low-Reynolds-Number Wings

The growing interest in micro aerial vehicles has brought attention to the need for an improved understanding of the aerodynamics of low-aspect-ratio wings at lowReynolds numbers. In this study, flat plate wings with rectangular and tapered planforms were fabricated with aspect ratios of 0.75, 1, 1.5, and 3, and the aerodynamic loading was measured at Reynolds numbers between 5 10 and 1 10. Surface tuft visualization was used to observe the interactions between the tip vortices and the leading-edge vortex. The tests were initially conducted at a sideslip angle of 0 and were then repeated for 10, 20, and 35 with and without winglets. Measurements made with a sixcomponent force balance showed that a decrease in aspect ratio caused an increase in stall and CLmax due to the nonlinear lift induced by the interacting flow on the upper wing surface. In addition, the detachment of tip vortices after stall leads to a sudden decrease in drag coefficient as the magnitude of the induced drag drops significantly. At increasing sideslip angles, the effects of the crossflow still contribute to an increase in lift but significantly reduce the pitching moment about the quarter-chord, thus decreasing the wing’s ability to recover from angle-of-attack perturbations. These results show that, while the effects of tip vortices and the leading-edge vortex complicate the flowfield around a low-aspect-ratio wing, particularly at increased sideslip angles, their impact tends to improve the aerodynamic performance.

[1]  W. Devenport,et al.  The structure and development of a wing-tip vortex , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  T. Colonius,et al.  Three-dimensional flows around low-aspect-ratio flat-plate wings at low Reynolds numbers , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Richard Hundley,et al.  Future Technology-Driven Revolutions in Military Operations , 1994 .

[4]  Tim Colonius,et al.  Control of vortex shedding on two- and three-dimensional aerofoils , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  David R. Williams,et al.  Low-Reynolds Number Wing Response to an Oscillating Freestream with and without Feed Forward Control , 2009 .

[6]  T. Mueller,et al.  Laminar Separation, Transition, and Turbulent Reattachment near the Leading Edge of Airfoils , 1980 .

[7]  Mohd Zulkifly Abdullah,et al.  Computational aerodynamic analysis on perimeter reinforced (PR)-compliant wing , 2013 .

[8]  R Waszak Martin,et al.  Stability and Control Properties of an Aeroelastic Fixed Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle , 2001 .

[9]  S. Watkins,et al.  The Turbulent Wind Environment of Birds, Insects and MAVs , 2004 .

[10]  M. Hall,et al.  A theory for the core of a leading-edge vortex , 1961, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  L. J. Pohlen,et al.  The influence of free-stream disturbances on low Reynolds number airfoil experiments , 1983 .

[12]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics of Low-Aspect-Ratio, Thin/Flat/Cambered-Plate Wings , 2000 .

[13]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Low-aspect-ratio wing aerodynamics at low Reynolds numbers , 2004 .

[14]  D. W. Bryer The Bursting of Leading-Edge Vortices Some Observations and Discussion of the Phenomenon , 2002 .

[15]  Matthew T. Keennon,et al.  Development of the Black Widow Micro Air Vehicle , 2001 .

[16]  W. Shyy,et al.  Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers , 2007 .

[17]  K. Lam,et al.  Asymmetric vortex shedding flow past an inclined flat plate at high incidence , 2005 .

[18]  L. B. Schiff,et al.  Visualization and wake surveys of vortical flow over a delta wing , 1988 .

[19]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing , 1966 .

[20]  Kamran Mohseni,et al.  Gust Characterization and Generation for Wind Tunnel Testing of Micro Aerial Vehicles , 2009 .

[21]  Yongsheng Lian,et al.  Investigation of Tip Vortex on Aerodynamic Performance of a Micro Air Vehicle , 2003 .

[22]  Kamran Mohseni,et al.  Using Dynamic Wind Tunnel Testing to Assess Micro Aerial Vehicle Stability Characteristics , 2010 .

[23]  K. Mohseni,et al.  Lift evaluation of a two-dimensional pitching flat plate , 2013 .

[24]  Tang Jian,et al.  Numerical and experimental study of flow structure of low-aspect-ratio wing , 2004 .

[25]  Y. Shmyglevskii,et al.  On “vortex breakdown” , 1995 .

[26]  Peter Ifju,et al.  Flexible-wing-based Micro Air Vehicles , 2002 .

[27]  Hajime Itoh,et al.  Effect of Aspect Ratio on Aerodynamic Characteristics at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2013 .

[28]  Zsófia Osváth,et al.  DOI: 10 , 2011 .

[29]  H A Hazen,et al.  THE MECHANICS OF FLIGHT. , 1893, Science.

[30]  Louis V. Schmidt,et al.  Introduction to Aircraft Flight Dynamics , 1998 .

[31]  B. Remes,et al.  Design, Aerodynamics, and Vision-Based Control of the DelFly , 2009 .

[32]  W. H. Melbourne,et al.  Atmospheric winds and their implications for microair vehicles , 2006 .

[33]  J Muelle,et al.  AERODYNAMICS OF SMALL VEHICLES , 2004 .

[34]  W. H. Liu,et al.  Flow developments above 50-deg sweep delta wings with different leading-edge profiles , 1995 .

[35]  Luther N. Jenkins,et al.  Stability and Control Properties of an Aeroelastic Fixed Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle , 2001 .

[36]  Kamran Mohseni,et al.  Passive mitigation of roll stall for low aspect ratio wings , 2013, Adv. Robotics.

[37]  Michael V. Ol,et al.  Leading-Edge Vortex Structure of Nonslender Delta Wings at Low Reynolds Number , 2003 .

[38]  Kamran Mohseni,et al.  Large Scale Gust Generation for Small Scale Wind Tunnel Testing of Atmospheric Turbulence , 2009 .