Predicting the index flood in ungauged UK catchments:On the link between data-transfer and spatial model error structure

Summary This paper presents a revised procedure for predicting the index flood in ungauged UK catchments based on a revised data-transfer methods. Using annual maximum peak flow data from 602 catchments in the UK, the performance of hydrological regression models linking the (log) index flood to a set of (log) catchment descriptors is investigated and compared to the benefit of enhancing the regression-based estimates with data-transfer from a gauged site that is either (i) geographically close, (ii) considered hydrologically similar, or (iii) both (i) and (ii). The study compares the performance of two regression models when combined with data-transfer: (i) a comprehensive model with four catchment descriptors, (ii) a simple model using only catchment area as an explanatory variable. The results show that the simple regression model benefits more from additional data-transfer than does the more comprehensive model. It is shown that, when data-transfer is included and when the ungauged and the gauged site are extremely close, the two models perform equally well. In cases where the nearest gauged catchment is 1–20 km away, data-transfer allows the simpler model to provide predictions which are only moderately worse than those from the comprehensive model, whereas if data-transfer is not used the simpler model is substantially worse than the comprehensive one. Little or no benefit was gained by selecting the gauged site by considering similarity of catchment area. Using data-transfer reduces the spatial correlation in the regression residuals. The results presented in this paper are believed to be of special interest to hydrologists working in regions where only a limited subset of catchments descriptor is routinely made available.

[1]  A. Brath,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of hydrological similarity measures for flood frequency analysis , 2001 .

[2]  J. Smith,et al.  Representation of basin scale in flood peak distributions , 1992 .

[3]  Khaled H. Hamed,et al.  Flood Frequency Analysis , 1999 .

[4]  Marco Franchini,et al.  Estimating the index flood using indirect methods , 2001 .

[5]  Roland Schulze,et al.  Flood frequency analysis at ungauged sites in the KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa , 2001 .

[6]  J. V. Sutcliffe,et al.  A worldwide comparison of regional flood estimation methods and climate , 1997 .

[7]  Oscar J. Mesa,et al.  Multiscaling theory of flood peaks: Regional quantile analysis , 1994 .

[8]  D. Burn.  Evaluation of regional flood frequency analysis with a region of influence approach , 1990 .

[9]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  An operational GLS model for hydrologic regression , 1989 .

[10]  T. Kjeldsen,et al.  Estimation of an index flood using data transfer in the UK , 2007 .

[11]  Daniele Bocchiola,et al.  Review of recent advances in index flood estimation , 2003 .

[12]  Gary D. Tasker,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF REGION‐OF‐INFLUENCE METHODS FOR FLOOD REGIONALIZATION IN THE GULF‐ATLANTIC ROLLING PLAINS 1 , 2005 .

[13]  J. Stedinger,et al.  Regional Hydrologic Analysis: 1. Ordinary, Weighted, and Generalized Least Squares Compared , 1985 .

[14]  T. Kjeldsen,et al.  A formal statistical model for pooled analysis of extreme floods , 2009 .

[15]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Flood frequency hydrology: 1. Temporal, spatial, and causal expansion of information , 2008 .

[16]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Flood frequency regionalisation—spatial proximity vs. catchment attributes , 2005 .

[17]  David A. Jones,et al.  An exploratory analysis of error components in hydrological regression modeling , 2009 .

[18]  Gary D. Tasker,et al.  Flood Regionalization: A Hybrid Geographic and Predictor-Variable Region-of-Influence Regression Method , 2007 .