Bayesian image restoration models for combining expert knowledge on recording activity with species distribution data

Biological atlases are, for many species, the only source of information on their distribution over large geographical areas, and are widely used to inform models of the environmental distribution of species. Such data are not collected using standardized survey techniques, however, and spatial variations in coverage (the relative extent or completeness of records) may lead to variations in the probability that the species will be recorded at locations where it is present (the ‘‘recording probability’’). If spatial patterns in recording probabilities are correlated with key environmental variables, then biased estimates of the relationships between environmental variables and species distributions may be obtained. We outline a general statistical framework for modelling the environmental distribution of species using, known as Bayesian Image Restoration (BIR). BIR can be used in combination with any species distribution model, but in addition allows us to account for spatial heterogeneity in recording probabilities by utilizing expert knowledge on spatial patterns in coverage. We illustrate the methodology by applying it to maps of the recorded distribution of two plant species in Germany, taken from the German atlas of vascular plants. We find that estimated spatial patterns in recording probabilities for both species are correlated with key environmental variables. Consequently, different relationships between the probability of presence of a species and environmental variables were obtained when the species distribution models were parameterised within a BIR framework. Care must be taken in the application of BIR, since the resulting inferences can depend strongly upon the modelling assumptions that are adopted. Nevertheless, we conclude that BIR has the potential to make better use of uncertain information on species distributions than conventional methods, and can be used to formally investigate the robustness of inferences on the environmental distribution of species to assumptions concerning spatial patterns in recording probabilities.

[1]  D. Chessel,et al.  ECOLOGICAL-NICHE FACTOR ANALYSIS: HOW TO COMPUTE HABITAT-SUITABILITY MAPS WITHOUT ABSENCE DATA? , 2002 .

[2]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[3]  Michael Drielsma,et al.  Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. II. Community-level modelling , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[4]  Jorge Soberón,et al.  Assessing completeness of biodiversity databases at different spatial scales , 2007 .

[5]  T. Rich,et al.  Floristic changes in vascular plants in the British Isles: geographical and temporal variation in botanical activity 1836–1988 , 2006 .

[6]  M. Sykes,et al.  Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  I. Kühn,et al.  The flora of German cities is naturally species rich , 2004 .

[8]  J. Lobo,et al.  An ED-based Protocol for Optimal Sampling of Biodiversity , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[9]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife , 1996 .

[10]  J. Besag On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures , 1986 .

[11]  J. Hortal,et al.  Butterfly species richness in mainland Portugal: predictive models of geographic distribution patterns , 2004 .

[12]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[13]  GLEN A. SARGEANT,et al.  MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO ESTIMATION OF SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS: A CASE STUDY OF THE SWIFT FOX IN WESTERN KANSAS , 2005 .

[14]  R. Swihart,et al.  Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models , 2004 .

[15]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  H. Possingham,et al.  IMPROVING PRECISION AND REDUCING BIAS IN BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS: ESTIMATING FALSE‐NEGATIVE ERROR RATES , 2003 .

[17]  Alberto Jiménez-Valverde,et al.  Limitations of Biodiversity Databases: Case Study on Seed‐Plant Diversity in Tenerife, Canary Islands , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[18]  S. Ferrier,et al.  Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. I. Species-level modelling , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[19]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL MODELS OF ABUNDANCE AND OCCURRENCE FROM IMPERFECT SURVEY DATA , 2007 .

[20]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  WAS IT THERE? DEALING WITH IMPERFECT DETECTION FOR SPECIES PRESENCE/ABSENCE DATA † , 2005 .

[21]  L. Hannah,et al.  Would climate change drive species out of reserves? An assessment of existing reserve‐selection methods , 2004 .

[22]  J. Heikkinen,et al.  Fully Bayesian Approach to Image Restoration with an Application in Biogeography , 1994 .

[23]  Jane Elith,et al.  Predicting species distributions from museum and herbarium records using multiresponse models fitted with multivariate adaptive regression splines , 2007 .

[24]  Sebastian Schmidtlein,et al.  Revealing biogeographical patterns by nonlinear ordinations and derived anisotropic spatial filters , 2008 .

[25]  Peter Rothery,et al.  A general method for measuring relative change in range size from biological atlas data , 2002 .

[26]  Stephen P Brooks,et al.  Bayesian computation: a statistical revolution , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Stephen Shennan,et al.  The spread of Neolithic plant economies from the Near East to northwest Europe: a phylogenetic analysis , 2008 .

[28]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Modelling distribution and abundance with presence‐only data , 2006 .

[29]  Marco Vighi,et al.  ALARM: Assessing LArge-scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods , 2005 .

[30]  T. Rich,et al.  Changes in the vascular plant floras of England and Scotland between 1930–1960 and 1987–1988: The BSBI Monitoring Scheme , 1996 .

[31]  Eckehart J. Jäger,et al.  Rothmaler - Exkursionsflora von Deutschland , 2007 .

[32]  A. Guisan,et al.  An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data , 2004 .

[33]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[34]  P. Walker,et al.  HABITAT : a procedure for modelling a disjoint environmental envelope for a plant or animal species , 1991 .

[35]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Relating geographical variation in pollination types to environmental and spatial factors using novel statistical methods. , 2006, The New phytologist.