Empathising, defining and ideating with the farming community to develop a geotagged photo app for smart devices: A design thinking approach

Abstract Context There is growing interest and importance for responsible research and innovation (RRI) among academic scholars and policy makers, especially, in relation to emerging technologies in the agricultural context. While the evolution of smart technologies in agriculture has led to an increase of available solutions that can be used by farmers, the RRI process of new farming technology has been minimally detailed in research contributions to date. Objective This paper thus aims to describe the first 3 phases of a design thinking process to aid with the development of an agricultural innovation, namely, a geotag photo application for use on smart devices. Methods The design thinking approach involved engaging with target users, such as farmers, farm advisors and inspectors, alongside research scientists, app developers and the national agricultural governing body in Ireland to commence the app development process. This paper describes methodology used to elicit the first three major phases of the design thinking approach: empathise, define and ideation. In the first phase a stakeholder mapping activity was conducted, as well as 7 focus groups and 10 interviews with users and other key actors regarding the challenges and needs related to using the app. The define phase included a reflection of results from the first phase and subsequent development of user-personas and problem statements to inform the third phase. The third phase, ideation, consisted of four interactive user-centred workshops, focusing on app needs, in which ideas and solutions were developed and prioritised. Results and conclusions The design thinking approach supported multiple stakeholders to express and evaluate the benefits and challenges they associated with the initial development phases involved in designing a new geotag photo app. It also revealed that, by including farmers and additional actors in developing new farming technology enables technology developers to harness the full value of multiples types of knowledge and expertise. In conclusion, future research on innovation development should consider that by enabling engagement among a wide variety of actors, such as that offered by the initial stages of design thinking, and attending to a greater diversity of values is essential to the development of a responsible, and responsive, digital tool. Significance This study is the first to methodically document the early stages of developing a geotag smartphone app using a design thinking approach. This paper will therefore benefit other scholars aiming to include farmers, and other agricultural stakeholders to have an input on the agri-tech development decisions that will ultimately impact their farming lives.

[1]  Selamawit Molla Fossum,et al.  Practicing responsible research and innovation in a crowdsourcing project in Norway , 2018 .

[2]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? , 2020, Global Food Security.

[3]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Designing and Conducting Focus Group Interviews , 2002 .

[4]  Cara A. Stitzlein,et al.  Foresighting Australian digital agricultural futures: Applying responsible innovation thinking to anticipate research and development impact under different scenarios , 2021 .

[5]  Thomas R Fisher,et al.  A design thinking framework for healthcare management and innovation. , 2016, Healthcare.

[6]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[7]  M. Robertson,et al.  The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers', advisers', researchers' monitoring, simulation, communication and performance evaluation , 2002 .

[8]  Wu-Yuin Hwang,et al.  From knowledge and skills to digital works: An application of design thinking in the information technology course , 2020 .

[9]  B. Bos,et al.  The RIO approach: Design and anchoring of sustainable animal husbandry systems , 2016, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[10]  Melissa J. Geist,et al.  Design thinking: Opportunities for application in nursing education. , 2018, Nurse Education Today.

[11]  Ruth Nettle,et al.  Supporting and practising digital innovation with advisers in smart farming , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[12]  Jonathan Steinke,et al.  Tapping the full potential of the digital revolution for agricultural extension: an emerging innovation agenda , 2020, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability.

[13]  Cécile Barnaud,et al.  Equity, Power Games, and Legitimacy: Dilemmas of Participatory Natural Resource Management , 2013 .

[14]  M. Carolan ‘Smart’ Farming Techniques as Political Ontology: Access, Sovereignty and the Performance of Neoliberal and Not‐So‐Neoliberal Worlds , 2018 .

[15]  Vincent Blok,et al.  Strengthening the socio-ethical foundations of the circular economy: Lessons from responsible research and innovation , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[16]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  M. Jeuffroy,et al.  Designing coupled innovations for the sustainability transition of agrifood systems , 2017 .

[18]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Supporting food systems transformation: The what, why, who, where and how of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems , 2020, Agricultural Systems.

[19]  Kelley Crites,et al.  Innovating language curriculum design through design thinking: A case study of a blended learning course at a Colombian university , 2020 .

[20]  David C. Rose,et al.  Decision support tools for agriculture: Towards effective design and delivery , 2016 .

[21]  V. Blok,et al.  The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation , 2015 .

[22]  Deborah E. White,et al.  Thematic Analysis , 2017 .

[23]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[24]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Opening design and innovation processes in agriculture: Insights from design and management sciences and future directions , 2018, Agricultural Systems.

[25]  A. P. Bos,et al.  Designing future dairy systems for New Zealand using reflexive interactive design , 2020 .

[26]  P. Baret,et al.  How Agricultural Research Systems Shape a Technological Regime that Develops Genetic Engineering but Locks Out Agroecological Innovations , 2009 .

[27]  W. Rossing,et al.  Co-innovation of family farm systems: A systems approach to sustainable agriculture , 2014 .

[28]  Jp Tom Djajadiningrat,et al.  Changing your Hammer: The Implications of Paradigmatic Innovation for Design Practice , 2014 .

[29]  Adalberto Mantovani Martiniano de Azevedo,et al.  Responsible innovation across borders: tensions, paradoxes and possibilities , 2014 .

[30]  V. Blok,et al.  Technology in the Age of Innovation: Responsible Innovation as a New Subdomain Within the Philosophy of Technology , 2019, Philosophy & Technology.

[31]  Á. Regan ‘Smart farming’ in Ireland: A risk perception study with key governance actors , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[32]  Marianne Cerf,et al.  Designers' and users' roles in participatory design: What is actually co-designed by participants? , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[33]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  Motivación de los empleados: un poderoso modelo nuevo , 2008 .

[34]  Danah Henriksen,et al.  Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice , 2017 .

[35]  Claire M. Mason,et al.  “If they don’t tell us what they do with it, why would we trust them?” Trust, transparency and benefit-sharing in Smart Farming , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[36]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand Agricultural Innovation System: Identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics , 2016 .

[37]  Andrew Peter Wallace McCarthy E DITOR ’ S C OMMENTS Diversity of Design Science Research , 2022 .

[38]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Science's new social contract with society , 1999, Nature.

[39]  Peter J. Thorburn,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Guiding the Participatory Development of Agricultural Decision Support Systems , 2010 .

[40]  Liz Allen,et al.  Alternative Perspectives on Impact: The Potential of ALMs and Altmetrics to Inform Funders about Research Impact , 2014, PLoS biology.

[41]  D. Rose,et al.  Agriculture 4.0: Broadening Responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming , 2018, Front. Sustain. Food Syst..

[42]  C. Eastwood,et al.  Managing Socio-Ethical Challenges in the Development of Smart Farming: From a Fragmented to a Comprehensive Approach for Responsible Research and Innovation , 2019 .

[43]  D. Guston Giving content to responsible innovation , 2014 .

[44]  Laurens Landeweerd,et al.  Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’ , 2014, Life sciences, society and policy.

[45]  Maryanne M. Gobble,et al.  Design Thinking , 2010, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible.

[46]  D. P. Macmynowski,et al.  Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science , 2007 .

[47]  Enrique G. Oracion,et al.  Toward developing a complete understanding: A social science research agenda for marine protected areas , 2003 .

[48]  Kelly Bronson,et al.  Looking through a responsible innovation lens at uneven engagements with digital farming , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[49]  H. Staats,et al.  Toward effective nature conservation on farmland: making farmers matter , 2013 .

[50]  J. H. Trienekens,et al.  Agricultural Value Chains in Developing Countries A Framework for Analysis , 2011 .

[51]  Ane Kirstine Aare,et al.  Exploring transitions towards sustainable farming practices through participatory research – The case of Danish farmers' use of species mixtures , 2021 .

[52]  L. Campbell Overcoming Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Research , 2005 .

[53]  R. V. Schomberg A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2013 .

[54]  Halimahtun M Khalid,et al.  Embracing diversity in user needs for affective design. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[55]  D. McDonagh,et al.  Rethinking design thinking: Empathy supporting innovation , 2010 .

[56]  Audley Genus,et al.  Collingridge and the dilemma of control: Towards responsible and accountable innovation , 2018 .

[57]  D. Turner Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators , 2010 .

[58]  A. Byrne,et al.  Gender and sustainability in rural Ireland , 2009 .

[59]  Todd C. Kelley,et al.  The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America's Leading Design Firm , 2001 .

[60]  Bruce V. Taylor,et al.  Digitalisation of agricultural knowledge and advice networks: A state-of-the-art review , 2020 .

[61]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions , 2018, Agricultural Systems.

[62]  Julie Ingram,et al.  Searching for meaning: Co-constructing ontologies with stakeholders for smarter search engines in agriculture , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[63]  S. Hendricks,et al.  A modified stakeholder participation assessment framework for design thinking in health innovation. , 2018, Healthcare.

[64]  Berit Brandth Gender identity in European family farming: A literature review , 2002 .

[65]  S. Wolfert,et al.  Ethics of smart farming: Current questions and directions for responsible innovation towards the future , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[66]  Ellen-Marie Forsberg,et al.  Institutionalising ELSA in the moment of breakdown? , 2014, Life sciences, society and policy.

[67]  P. Macnaghten,et al.  Making Smallholder Value Chain Partnerships Inclusive: Exploring Digital Farm Monitoring through Farmer Friendly Smartphone Platforms , 2020, Sustainability.

[68]  Cécile Barnaud,et al.  How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods , 2016 .

[69]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[70]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: concepts, analysis and interventions , 2012 .

[71]  M. Winter,et al.  Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet , 2021, Land Use Policy.

[72]  Rob J.F. Burton,et al.  Creating culturally sustainable agri-environmental schemes , 2011 .

[73]  Zvi Hochman,et al.  Probing the enigma of the decision support system for farmers: Learning from experience and from theory , 2002 .

[74]  Aysha Fleming,et al.  Discourses of technology, ageing and participation , 2018, Palgrave Communications.