Cognitive Metaphor and Empirical Methods

In the intellectual marketplace, different theories of language compete among themselves vying for their niche. One effective way of achieving such a goal is by offering some distinctive feature that makes them stand out from the rest. Such a ’difference’ can rest on several grounds: for example, a specific methodology specially suited to the study of a particular linguistic level (e.g. morphology), a new perspective from which to look at linguistic phenomena (e.g. by combining insights from two different disciplines, say, linguistics and sociology), etc. Cognitive linguistics (henceforth, CL) is a theory of language that attempts to describe language in connection to the rest of cognition. This aspiration was explicitly formulated by one of the founders of the movement, George Lakoff. In his “Cognitive Commitment” (Lakoff 1990: 40), he emphasized the need to provide an account of language that was consistent with what other cognitive science disciplines (neuroscience, cognitive psychology, developmental psychology, psycholinguistics, etc) have revealed about cognition and the brain. Put in another way, linguists need to take empirical evidence from other cognitive sciences seriously. This very same point has also been stressed by Gibbs (1996) when commenting on the adjective cognitive in CL:

[1]  Gibbs,et al.  Making good psychology out of blending theory. , 2001 .

[2]  C. Petten,et al.  Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[3]  P. Tichý.  Constructions , 1986, Philosophy of Science.

[4]  L. Boroditsky.  Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Gesture and Silence as Indicators of Planning in Speech , 1978 .

[6]  Julio Santiago,et al.  Flexible Conceptual Projection of Time Onto Spatial Frames of Reference , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[8]  R. Gibbs.  What's cognitive about cognitive linguistics? , 1996 .

[9]  L. Boroditsky.  Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors , 2000, Cognition.

[10]  Rebecca A. Webb.  Linguistic features of metaphoric gestures , 1997 .

[11]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right hemisphere sensitivity to word- and sentence-level context: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2005, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[12]  Mutsumi Imai,et al.  Is the future always ahead? Evidence for system-mappings in understanding space-time metaphors , 2003 .

[13]  M J Pickering,et al.  The processing of metonymy: evidence from eye movements. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Claudia Brugman.  The Story of over : polysemy, semantics, and the structure of the lexicon , 1988 .

[15]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think , 2002 .

[16]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1981 .

[18]  D. Sandra,et al.  Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind—the linguist’s or the language user’s? , 1995 .

[19]  Friedrich Ungerer,et al.  An introduction to cognitive linguistics , 1999 .

[20]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Metaphor and Thought: How metaphors work , 1993 .

[21]  S. Glucksberg.  Understanding figurative language : from metaphors to idioms , 2001 .

[22]  R. Gibbs.  The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding , 1994 .

[23]  Cristina Soriano-Salinas.  The conceptualization of anger in english and spanish. A cognitive approach , 2005 .

[24]  J. Pynte,et al.  The Time-Course of Metaphor Comprehension: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1996, Brain and Language.

[25]  J. Mahon.  The Poetics of Mind , 1996 .

[26]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish , 2004 .

[27]  Reading anger stories: A lexical decision task as a test for the existence of metaphorical representation , 2007 .

[28]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Linguistic evidence and mental representations , 1998 .

[29]  S. Vereza.  Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 2001 .

[30]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Conventional Language: How Metaphorical Is It? , 2000 .

[31]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Psycholinguistic studies on the conceptual basis of idiomaticity , 1990 .

[32]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  Regular metaphoricity in gesture: bodily-based models of speech interaction , 1998 .

[33]  Psycholinguistics and mental representations , 2000 .

[34]  A. Roepstorff,et al.  Motion verb sentences activate left posterior middle temporal cortex despite static context , 2005, Neuroreport.

[35]  Seana Coulson,et al.  Electrophysiology and Pragmatic Language Comprehension , 2004 .

[36]  G. Lakoff.  The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor , 1993 .

[37]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought , 2002, Psychological science.

[38]  G. Murphy.  On metaphoric representation , 1996, Cognition.

[39]  David Tuggy.  Linguistic evidence for polysemy in the mind: a response to William Croft and Dominiek Sandra , 2001 .

[40]  SANDRA DOMINIEK,et al.  What linguists can and can't tell you about the human mind: A reply to Croft , 1998 .

[41]  B. Keysar,et al.  Swimming against the current: Do idioms reflect conceptual structure? , 1999 .

[42]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Metaphor understanding and accessing conceptual schema : reply to Gibbs (1992) , 1992 .

[43]  Z. Kövecses,et al.  Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation , 2005 .

[44]  Mark Turner,et al.  Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science , 1997 .

[45]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean , 1999 .

[46]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Conceptual structure, discourse and language , 1996 .

[47]  C. Creider.  Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought , 1994 .

[48]  G. Lakoff,et al.  More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor , 1991 .

[49]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[50]  Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods , 2007 .

[51]  A. Kendon.  Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation , 1995 .

[52]  Monica Gonzalez-Marquez,et al.  Methods in cognitive linguistics , 2007 .

[53]  G. Lakoff,et al.  More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor , 1991 .

[54]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Eye movements in language and cognition: A brief introduction. , 2007 .

[55]  R. Gibbs.  Categorization and metaphor understanding. , 1992, Psychological review.