Effective area of a horizontal long-wire antenna collecting the atmospheric electric vertical current

The effective area of an antenna collecting the vertical air-Earth current is a coefficient of proportionality between the collected current and the air-Earth current density. The effective area can be correctly defined only if the model behind the proportionality relation is adequate. The current collected by a horizontal long-wire antenna is not exactly proportional to the vertical air-Earth Maxwell current density because of the different behavior of the displacement and conduction components of the current. Thus, two different effective areas are separately defined for the displacement and nondisplacement components. First, the dynamic effective area characterizes rapid variations of the displacement current. It is calculated assuming that the air does not contain any space charges and that the electric current flow lines match the electric field lines. Second, the static effective area characterizes the nondisplacement current, and it is calculated by taking into account the facts that the conductivity close to the wire surface is unipolar, that the wind-determined horizontal ion trajectories do not match the electric field lines, and that there are space charges due to the electrode effect of the wire and of the ground. Traditionally, the atmospheric electric vertical current density measurements have been interpreted by using the dynamic effective area as a calibration coefficient. This turns out to be a satisfactory approximation in the case of strong turbulence when the near-ground space charge layer is high and the static effective area approaches the dynamic effective area. In the limit of low turbulence the traditional interpretation results in errors of several tens percent. A reduced height of the antenna helps to keep the static effective area close to the dynamic effective area and to suppress the errors.

[1]  S. Israelsson,et al.  Vertical profiles of electrical conductivity in the lowermost part of the turbulent boundary layer over flat ground , 1994 .

[2]  S. Israelsson The effects of wind and evaporation on space charge formation at the ground , 1994 .

[3]  E. Bering,et al.  Ground-based instrumentation for measurements of atmospheric conduction current and electric field at the South Pole , 1993 .

[4]  A. Weinheimer,et al.  Factor of 2 error in balloon‐borne atmospheric conduction current measurements , 1986 .

[5]  J. Willett Atmospheric-electrical implications of 222Rn daughter deposition on vegetated ground , 1985 .

[6]  J. Willett The turbulent electrode effect as influenced by interfacial ion transfer , 1983 .

[7]  T. Tuomi The atmospheric electrode effect over snow , 1982 .

[8]  D. Hofmann,et al.  Results of an international workshop on atmospheric electrical measurements , 1982 .

[9]  T. Tuomi Atmospheric electrode effect: Approximate theory and wintertime observations , 1980 .

[10]  H. K. Burke,et al.  Direct measurements of the atmospheric conduction current , 1978 .

[11]  W. Hoppel,et al.  Determination of eddy diffusion coefficients from atmospheric electrical measurements , 1971 .

[12]  Hannes Tammet,et al.  The aspiration method for the Determination of Atmospheric-Ion Spectra , 1970 .

[13]  L. Ruhnke AREA AVERAGING OF ATMOSPHERIC ELECTRIC CURRENTS. , 1969 .

[14]  W. Crozier Measuring atmospheric potential with passive antennas , 1963 .

[15]  H. Dolezalek Zur Berechnung des luftelektrischen Stromkreises III: Kontrolle des Ohmschen Gesetzes durch Messung , 1960 .

[16]  David J. Rose,et al.  Basic Processes of Gaseous Electronics , 1956 .