Contributions of suppression and excitation to simultaneous masking: effects of signal frequency and masker-signal frequency relation.

This study investigated the contributions of suppression and excitation to simultaneous masking for a range of masker frequencies both below and above three different signal frequencies (750, 2000, and 4850 Hz). A two-stage experiment was employed. In stage I, the level of each off-frequency simultaneous masker necessary to mask a signal at 10 or 30 dB sensation level was determined. In stage II, three different forward-masking conditions were tested: (1) an on-frequency condition, in which the signals in stage I were used to mask probes of the same frequency; (2) an off-frequency condition, in which the off-frequency maskers (at the levels determined in stage I) were used to mask the probes; and (3) a combined condition, in which the on- and off-frequency maskers were combined to mask the probes. If the off-frequency maskers simultaneously masked the signal via spread of excitation in stage I, then the off-frequency and combined maskers should produce considerable forward masking in stage II. If, on the other hand, they masked via suppression, they should produce little or no forward masking. The contribution of suppression was found to increase with increasing signal frequency; it was absent at 750 Hz, but dominant at 4850 Hz. These results have implications for excitation pattern analyses and are consistent with stronger nonlinear processing at high rather than at low frequencies.

[1]  L. Robles,et al.  Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J J Zwislocki,et al.  Effects of hair cell lesions on responses of cochlear nerve fibers. I. Lesions, tuning curves, two-tone inhibition, and responses to trapezoidal-wave patterns. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  D L Neff Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Masking patterns for sinusoidal and narrow-band noise maskers. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J. Allen,et al.  Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  E. Zwicker,et al.  A MODEL OF LOUDNESS SUMMATION. , 1965, Psychological review.

[7]  B. Moore,et al.  Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The Masking of Pure Tones and of Speech by White Noise , 1950 .

[9]  B C Moore,et al.  Contralateral and ipsilateral cueing in forward masking. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  B C Moore,et al.  The role of spread excitation and suppression in simultaneous masking. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. L. Wegel,et al.  The Auditory Masking of One Pure Tone by Another and its Probable Relation to the Dynamics of the Inner Ear , 1924 .

[12]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Nonlinear input-output functions derived from the responses of guinea-pig cochlear nerve fibres: Variations with characteristic frequency , 1994, Hearing Research.

[13]  S Rosen,et al.  Auditory filter bandwidths as a function of level at low frequencies (125 Hz-1 kHz) , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  T. Houtgast Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  S P Bacon,et al.  Growth of simultaneous masking for fm < fs: effects of overall frequency and level. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Informational masking for multicomponent maskers with spectral gaps. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  X D Pang,et al.  Growth rate of simultaneous masking in cat auditory-nerve fibers: relationship to the growth of basilar-membrane motion and the origin of two-tone suppression. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  D. L. Weber Do off-frequency simultaneous maskers suppress the signal? , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  L. Vogten,et al.  Low-level pure-tone masking: a comparison of "tuning curves" obtained with simultaneous and forward masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  S P Bacon,et al.  Psychophysical suppression as a function of signal frequency: noise and tonal maskers. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Gerald Kidd,et al.  Patterns of residual masking , 1981, Hearing Research.

[22]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Two-tone rate suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: Dependence on suppressor frequency and level , 1990, Hearing Research.

[23]  R. Shannon Two-tone unmasking and suppression in a forward-masking situation. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  M S Sommers,et al.  Auditory suppression and frequency selectivity in older and younger adults. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[26]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes derived in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  B C Moore,et al.  Interactions of masker bandwidth with signal duration and delay in forward masking. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  B. Delgutte Physiological Models for Basic Auditory Percepts , 1996 .

[29]  J. O. Pickles,et al.  Frequency threshold curves and simultaneous masking functions in single fibres of the guinea pig auditory nerve , 1984, Hearing Research.

[30]  Guido F. Smoorenburg,et al.  Audibility region of combination tones , 1972 .

[31]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  N Suga,et al.  Properties of ‘two‐tone inhibition’ in primary auditory neurones , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  William S. Rhode,et al.  Nonlinear mechanics at the apex of the guinea-pig cochlea , 1995, Hearing Research.

[34]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  H. Duifhuis,et al.  Level effects in psychophysical two-tone suppression. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  N. Cooper,et al.  Two-tone suppression in cochlear mechanics. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  S. Bacon,et al.  Psychophysical measures of auditory nonlinearities as a function of frequency in individuals with normal hearing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  B C Moore,et al.  Interpreting the role of suppression in psychophysical tuning curves. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  D. Harris Action potential suppression, tuning curves and thresholds: Comparison with single fiber data , 1979, Hearing Research.

[40]  Suppression and the upward spread of masking. , 1998 .

[41]  B. Moore,et al.  A revision of Zwicker's loudness model , 1996 .

[42]  H. Fletcher Relation Between Loudness and Masking , 1937 .

[43]  H. Hake,et al.  On the Masking Pattern of a Simple Auditory Stimulus , 1950 .

[44]  M. Sachs,et al.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Eric Javel Shapes of cat auditory nerve fiber tuning curves , 1994, Hearing Research.