Social selection models for multilevel networks

Abstract Social selection models (SSMs) incorporate nodal attributes as explanatory covariates for modelling network ties ( Robins et al., 2001 ). The underlying assumption is that the social processes represented by the graph configurations without attributes are not homogenous, and the network heterogeneity maybe captured by nodal level exogenous covariates. In this article, we propose SSMs for multilevel networks as extensions to exponential random graph models (ERGMs) for multilevel networks ( Wang et al., 2013 ). We categorize the proposed model configurations by their similarities in interpretations arising from complex dependencies among ties within and across levels as well as the different types of nodal attributes. The features of the proposed models are illustrated using a network data set collected among French elite cancer researchers and their affiliated laboratories with attribute information about both researchers and laboratories ( Lazega et al., 2006 , Lazega et al., 2008 ). Comparisons between the models with and without nodal attributes highlight the importance of attribute effects across levels, where the attributes of nodes at one level affect the network structure at the other level.

[1]  E. Lazega,et al.  Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: A logistic regression model for dyadic network data , 1997 .

[2]  Garry Robins,et al.  Obesity-related behaviors in adolescent friendship networks , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[3]  Peng Wang,et al.  Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: Exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[4]  R. Breiger The Duality of Persons and Groups , 1974 .

[5]  Alessandro Lomi,et al.  A model for the multiplex dynamics of two-mode and one-mode networks, with an application to employment preference, friendship, and advice , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[6]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks , 2013 .

[7]  F. Agneessens,et al.  Local Structural Properties and Attribute Characteristics in 2-mode Networks: p* Models to Map Choices of Theater Events , 2008 .

[8]  Garry Robins,et al.  Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Formation of Social Network Structure , 2012 .

[9]  D. Hunter,et al.  Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models , 2008 .

[10]  Rafaël Stofer,et al.  Discipline scientifique et discipline sociale : Réseaux de conseil, apprentissage collectif et innovation dans la recherche française sur le cancer (1997-1999) , 2004 .

[11]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Statistical Modelling of One-Mode and Two-Mode Networks: Simultaneous Analysis of Graphs and Bipartite Graphs , 1991 .

[12]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp , 1996 .

[13]  G. Robins,et al.  A Social Network Analysis of Hegemonic and other Masculinities , 2010 .

[14]  T. Snijders Statistical Models for Social Networks , 2011 .

[15]  P. Holland,et al.  An Exponential Family of Probability Distributions for Directed Graphs , 1981 .

[16]  P. Pattison,et al.  Small and Other Worlds: Global Network Structures from Local Processes1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Statistical Models for Social Networks , 2000 .

[18]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Bringing Personalized Ties back in: Their Added Value for Biotech Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists Interorganizational Networks , 2011 .

[19]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[20]  Peng Wang,et al.  Exponential random graph models for multilevel networks , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[21]  P. Pattison,et al.  9. Neighborhood-Based Models for Social Networks , 2002 .

[22]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Network Lift from Dual Alters: Extended Opportunity Structures from a Multilevel and Structural Perspective , 2013 .

[23]  Garry Robins,et al.  Network models for social selection processes , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[24]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Organizational vs. personal social capital in scientists' performance: A multi-level network study of elite French cancer researchers (1996-1998) , 2006, Scientometrics.

[25]  Garry Robins,et al.  Illustrations: simulation, estimation and goodness of fit , 2013 .

[26]  Ove Frank,et al.  http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained , 2007 .

[27]  Johan H. Koskinen,et al.  Modelling the evolution of a bipartite network - Peer referral in interlocking directorates , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[28]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[29]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[30]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[31]  Peng Wang,et al.  Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Exponential Random Graph Model Extensions: Models for Multiple Networks and Bipartite Networks , 2012 .

[32]  Garry Robins,et al.  Exponential random graph models for social networks: theories, methods and applications , 2012 .

[33]  S. Goodreau,et al.  Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks* , 2009, Demography.

[34]  Philip Selznick TVA and the grass roots , 1949 .

[35]  Philip Selznick,et al.  TVA and the grass roots : a study of politics and organization , 1980 .

[36]  Peng Wang,et al.  Univariate and multivariate models of positive and negative networks: Liking, disliking, and bully-victim relationships , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[37]  Garry Robins,et al.  An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[38]  P. Pattison,et al.  New Specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models , 2006 .

[39]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[40]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[41]  P. Pattison,et al.  Building models for social space: neighourhood-based models for social networks and affiliation structures , 2004 .

[42]  Michael Useem,et al.  The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U. S. and U.K. , 1986 .

[43]  T. Snijders The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics , 2001 .

[44]  T. Snijders,et al.  Modeling the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior , 2007 .

[45]  Peng Wang,et al.  Exponential random graph models for affiliation networks , 2009, Soc. Networks.