Detection and identification of mirror-image letter pairs in central and peripheral vision

Reading performance is poorer in the peripheral than in the central visual field, even after size-scaling to compensate for differences in visual acuity at the different eccentricities. Since several studies have indicated that the peripheral retina is deficient with respect to spatial phase discrimination, we compared the psychometric functions for detection (D) and identification (I) of size-scaled, mirror-symmetric letters (i.e. letters differing in the phase spectra of their odd symmetric components) at three inferior field eccentricities (0, 4, and 7.5 deg) using a two-alternative, temporal, forced-choice procedure and retinal image stabilization to control retinal locus. Each subject's data were fit with Weibull functions and tested for goodness-of-fit under several hypotheses. This analysis revealed that while the psychometric functions were of constant shape across eccentricity for the respective tasks, they showed statistically significant variations in the D/I threshold ratios. However, these variations were so small that poorer reading outside the fovea is unlikely to be due to reduced letter discriminability that might occur secondary to a loss of peripheral field phase sensitivity.

[1]  M C FLOM,et al.  VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[3]  J Rovamo,et al.  Texture discrimination at different eccentricities. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  H. D. Crane,et al.  Accurate three-dimensional eyetracker. , 1978, Applied optics.

[5]  K Knoblauch,et al.  Reading with fixed and variable character pitch. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  D. Burr,et al.  Evidence for edge and bar detectors in human vision , 1989, Vision Research.

[7]  S. Whittaker,et al.  Eccentric fixation with macular scotoma. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Sensitivity to phase distortions in central and peripheral vision , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  E. Mehr,et al.  Training and Practice Effects in Performance with Low‐Vision Aids: A Preliminary Study , 1977, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[10]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[11]  Kenneth Knoblauch,et al.  Dual bases in dichromatic color space , 1995 .

[12]  Ingo Rentschler,et al.  Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision , 1985, Nature.

[13]  S. Klein,et al.  Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[14]  L O Harvey,et al.  Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  G. McConkie,et al.  What guides a reader's eye movements? , 1976, Vision Research.

[16]  H D Crane,et al.  Three-dimensional visual stimulus deflector. , 1978, Applied optics.

[17]  H. Burian,et al.  A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. , 1962, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  G. Westheimer.  Visual acuity and hyperacuity: resolution, localization, form. , 1987, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[19]  R. J. Watt,et al.  Spatial information and uncertainty in anisometropic amblyopia , 1987, Vision Research.

[20]  J. O'Regan.  Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[21]  M. Banks,et al.  Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms and phase anomalies in peripheral vision , 1987, Nature.

[22]  R. Bracewell.  The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[23]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Lateral masking in foveal and eccentric vision , 1978, Vision Research.

[24]  S. Whittaker,et al.  Scanning characters and reading with a central scotoma. , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[25]  D. Burr,et al.  Discrimination of spatial phase in central and peripheral vision , 1989, Vision Research.

[26]  J. Farrell,et al.  Equating character-identification performance across the visual field. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  Jacob Nachmias,et al.  A re-evaluation of curvature-specific chromatic aftereffects , 1975, Vision Research.

[28]  M. Banks,et al.  The effects of contrast, spatial scale, and orientation on foveal and peripheral phase discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.

[29]  E. Faye,et al.  Clinical Low Vision , 1976 .

[30]  R. Weale,et al.  Colour Vision Deficiencies , 1981 .

[31]  J P Thomas,et al.  Effect of eccentricity on the relationship between detection and identification. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[32]  R. Jacobs.  Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery , 1979, Vision Research.

[33]  R. Jose.  Understanding low vision , 1983 .

[34]  T. Cohn,et al.  Effect of large spatial uncertainty on foveal luminance increment detectability. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[35]  J Rovamo,et al.  Analysis of spatial structure in eccentric vision. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  G. Westheimer.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[37]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Low vision reading with sequential word presentation , 1994, Vision Research.

[38]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[39]  F. Vitu,et al.  The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  A. Watson.  Probability summation over time , 1979, Vision Research.