Quantification of the Dynamic Visual Acuity Space at Real-World Luminances and Contrasts: The VA-CAL Test

Purpose Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is assessed at a single standardized luminance with maximum optotype contrast, not reflecting the constantly changing daily-life viewing conditions. For a more realistic estimation of visual performance at varying object contrasts (Cs) and ambient luminances (ALs), we developed a new VA test, VA-CAL. Methods Landolt-C-rings between 18% and 95% Weber contrast, were presented at 1 m distance (8 Alternative Forced Choice) on a 5.7 degree field in the middle of a frosted glass screen (66 degrees), back-lit by 3060 LEDs (generating ambient luminances between 0–10,000 cd/m²). Visual acuity (VA) was measured in 14 normally sighted participants twice for 8 conditions of ambient luminance and 6 conditions of contrast using a QUEST staircase procedure. Results VA improved continuously up to an ambient luminance of 3000 to 5000 cd/m² (best mean VA ± SEM: −0.47 ± 0.03 logMAR at C = 95%, AL = 3000 cd/m²), followed by a decline of VA at higher luminances with good test-retest variability. As expected, reduced contrast leads to a lower VA (worst mean VA ± SEM: −0.03 ± 0.03 logMAR at C = 18%, AL = 0 cd/m²). A 3D plot of these data shows the VA space (VAS) extending between the contrast and luminance axes, which describes the dynamics of VA continuously changing under varying everyday life conditions. Conclusions VA-CAL, an automated device and procedure, allows for simultaneous evaluation of VA at various contrast-luminance combinations, thus providing a more comprehensive assessment of spatial vision problems not seen with standard BCVA tests. Translational Relevance The new BCVA test VA-CAL incorporates a range of everyday contrast and ambient luminance conditions for a more realistic description of visual performance.

[1]  R. Bahadur,et al.  Keratoconus , 2020, All about Your Eyes, Second Edition, revised and updated.

[2]  U. Schiefer,et al.  Neue DIN- und ISO-Normen zur Sehschärfebestimmung , 2019, Der Ophthalmologe.

[3]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits , 2018, Translational vision science & technology.

[4]  Gang Chen,et al.  Intraclass correlation: improved modeling approaches and applications for neuroimaging , 2017, bioRxiv.

[5]  Mariela C. Aguilar,et al.  New Methods for Quantification of Visual Photosensitivity Threshold and Symptoms , 2017, Translational vision science & technology.

[6]  U. Schiefer,et al.  Kontrastsehen – Definitionen, Umrechnungen und Äquivalenztabelle , 2017, Der Ophthalmologe.

[7]  Patrick J. Rosopa,et al.  Observers’ Judgments of the Effects of Glare on Their Visual Acuity for High and Low Contrast Stimuli , 2016, Perception.

[8]  M. Bach,et al.  Visual Acuity Testing: Feedback Affects Neither Outcome nor Reproducibility, but Leaves Participants Happier , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  L. Joskowicz,et al.  Comparison of Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts using a computer simulation. , 2016, International journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  H. Bolz,et al.  The ophthalmic phenotype of IFT140-related ciliopathy ranges from isolated to syndromic congenital retinal dystrophy , 2015, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[11]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis , 2015, Molecular reproduction and development.

[12]  E. Ceisler,et al.  Achromatopsia: a review , 2015, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[13]  H. Bolz,et al.  Peripherin mutations cause a distinct form of recessive Leber congenital amaurosis and dominant phenotypes in asymptomatic parents heterozygous for the mutation , 2015, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[14]  Jan E. Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic , 2013, Vision Research.

[15]  Gary S Rubin,et al.  Low luminance visual dysfunction as a predictor of subsequent visual acuity loss from geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[16]  A. Lam,et al.  Repeatability of near visual acuity measurement at high and low contrast , 2008, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[17]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  Michael Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-Variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[19]  M. Pettet,et al.  The repeatability of best corrected acuity in normal and amblyopic children 4 to 12 years of age. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Wolfgang Wesemann,et al.  Sehschärfebestimmung mit Freiburger Visustest, Bailey-Lovie-Tafel und Landoltring-Tafel , 2002 .

[21]  M Mäntyjärvi,et al.  Normal values for the Pelli‐Robson contrast sensitivity test , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  M. Schneck,et al.  The Relation Between Visual Acuity and Other Spatial Vision Measures , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[24]  Ping Situ,et al.  Visual acuity versus letter contrast sensitivity in early cataract , 1998, Vision Research.

[25]  Harold E. Bedell Visual acuity , 1997, Emergency Medicine.

[26]  C. Johnson,et al.  Effects of Luminance, Contrast, and Blur on Visual Acuity , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  E. Zrenner,et al.  ["Glare vision". I. Physiological principles of vision change with increased test field luminance]. , 1992, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[28]  E. Zrenner,et al.  ["Glare vision". II. Study of visual acuity of glare sensitive patients in increasing test field luminance]. , 1992, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[29]  J E Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  High and Low Contrast Acuity and Clinical Contrast Sensitivity Tested in a Normal Population , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  J. Holladay,et al.  Brightness acuity test and outdoor visual acuity in cataract patients , 1987, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[31]  D. R. Bates Rayleigh scattering by air , 1984 .

[32]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  L. L. Sloan,et al.  Acuity-luminance function in achromatopsia and in progressive cone degeneration: factors related to individual differences in tolerance to bright light. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[35]  M. Alpern,et al.  Adaptation of the pupil light reflex. , 1972, Vision research.

[36]  G Westheimer,et al.  Pupil size and visual resolution. , 1964, Vision research.

[37]  A Duane,et al.  Studies in Monocular and Binocular Accommodation, with Their Clinical Application. , 1922, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[38]  G. C. Ross Cataract , 1878, The Lancet.

[39]  U. Schiefer,et al.  [New DIN norms for determination of visual acuity]. , 2010, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[40]  W. David Hairston,et al.  An adaptive staircase procedure for the E-Prime programming environment , 2009, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[41]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[42]  D. Cicchetti Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[43]  T. J. van den Berg On the relation between glare and straylight. , 1991, Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology.

[44]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[45]  E. Aulhorn,et al.  [The mesoptometer, a device for the examination of twilight vision and susceptibility to blinding]. , 1965, Bericht uber die Zusammenkunft. Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft.