Combined magnetic and kinetic control of advanced tokamak steady state scenarios based on semi-empirical modelling

This paper shows that semi-empirical data-driven models based on a two-time-scale approximation for the magnetic and kinetic control of advanced tokamak (AT) scenarios can be advantageously identified from simulated rather than real data, and used for control design. The method is applied to the combined control of the safety factor profile, q(x), and normalized pressure parameter, βN, using DIII-D parameters and actuators (on-axis co-current neutral beam injection (NBI) power, off-axis co-current NBI power, electron cyclotron current drive power, and ohmic coil). The approximate plasma response model was identified from simulated open-loop data obtained using a rapidly converging plasma transport code, METIS, which includes an MHD equilibrium and current diffusion solver, and combines plasma transport nonlinearity with 0D scaling laws and 1.5D ordinary differential equations. The paper discusses the results of closed-loop METIS simulations, using the near-optimal ARTAEMIS control algorithm (Moreau D et al 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 063020) for steady state AT operation. With feedforward plus feedback control, the steady state target q-profile and βN are satisfactorily tracked with a time scale of about 10 s, despite large disturbances applied to the feedforward powers and plasma parameters. The robustness of the control algorithm with respect to disturbances of the H&CD actuators and of plasma parameters such as the H-factor, plasma density and effective charge, is also shown.

[1]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  A model-based technique for integrated real-time profile control in the JET tokamak , 2004 .

[2]  T. Fujita,et al.  Core transport properties in JT-60U and JET identity plasmas , 2011 .

[3]  F. Felici,et al.  Real-time physics-model-based simulation of the current density profile in tokamak plasmas , 2011 .

[4]  R. H. Bulmer,et al.  Sustained Spheromak Physics Experiment (SSPX): design and physics results , 2012 .

[5]  Y. R. Martin,et al.  Recent progress on the development and analysis of the ITPA global H-mode confinement database , 2007 .

[6]  M. Steinbuch,et al.  Control of the tokamak safety factor profile with time-varying constraints using MPC , 2015 .

[7]  T. Fujita,et al.  Development of advanced operation scenarios in weak magnetic-shear regime on JT-60U , 2009 .

[8]  Experts,et al.  Integrated magnetic and kinetic control of advanced tokamak plasmas on DIII-D based on data-driven models , 2013 .

[9]  L. Lao,et al.  Reconstruction of current profile parameters and plasma shapes in tokamaks , 1985 .

[10]  T. Petrie,et al.  Progress toward fully noninductive discharge operation in DIII-D using off-axis neutral beam injection , 2012 .

[11]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Toroidal current profile control during low confinement mode plasma discharges in DIII-D via first-principles-driven model-based robust control synthesis , 2012 .

[12]  R. J. La Haye,et al.  Plasma models for real-time control of advanced tokamak scenarios , 2011 .

[13]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  A two-time-scale dynamic-model approach for magnetic and kinetic profile control in advanced tokamak scenarios on JET , 2008 .

[14]  F. Felici,et al.  Non-linear model-based optimization of actuator trajectories for tokamak plasma profile control , 2012 .

[15]  Hassan K. Khalil,et al.  Singular perturbation methods in control : analysis and design , 1986 .

[16]  B. P. Duval,et al.  Inter-machine comparison of intrinsic toroidal rotation in tokamaks , 2007 .

[17]  E. Joffrin,et al.  The CRONOS suite of codes for integrated tokamak modelling , 2010 .

[18]  T. C. Luce,et al.  Realizing Steady State Tokamak Operation for Fusion Energy , 2009 .

[19]  M. A. Van Zeeland,et al.  Steady state scenario development with elevated minimum safety factor on DIII-D , 2014 .

[20]  X. Litaudon,et al.  Predictive transport simulations of real-time profile control in JET advanced tokamak plasmas , 2005 .