Conceptual representations enhance knowledge construction in asynchronous collaboration

An experimental study of asynchronously communicating dyads tested the claim that conceptual representations could more effectively support collaborative knowledge construction in online learning than threaded discussions. Results showed that users of conceptual representations created more hypotheses earlier in the experimental sessions and elaborated on hypotheses more than users of threaded discussions. Participants using conceptual representations were more likely to converge on the same conclusion and scored higher on post-test questions that required integration of information distributed across dyads in a hidden profile design. However, the essay contents and post-test offered no evidence for differences in information sharing in itself. These results were most consistent when a knowledge map with embedded notes was the primary means of interaction rather than when it augmented a threaded discussion.

[1]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Designing Biases That Augment Socio-Cognitive Interactions , 2005 .

[2]  Christopher M. Hoadley,et al.  Between information and communication: middle spaces in computer media for learning , 1999, CSCL.

[3]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Information sharing is incongruous with collaborative convergence: the case for interaction , 2007, CSCL.

[4]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[5]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[6]  Mark Hawkes,et al.  Examining the reflective outcomes of asynchronous computer-mediated communication on inservice teacher development , 2001 .

[7]  Jim Hewitt.  Beyond Threaded Discourse , 2001 .

[8]  D. Suthers,et al.  “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry , 2002 .

[9]  G. Wells,et al.  "Dialogic Inquiry. Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education", Gordon Wells, Cambridge 1999 : [recenzja] / Marta Marchow. , 2001 .

[10]  G. Wells.  Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Socio-cultural Practice and Theory of Education , 1999 .

[11]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[12]  Judith Good,et al.  Learning to Think and Communicate with Diagrams: 14 Questions to Consider , 2001, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[13]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[14]  Pierre Tchounikine,et al.  Supporting Emergence of Threaded Learning Conversations Through Augmenting Interactional and Sequential Coherence , 2003, CSCL.

[15]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.

[16]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning Processes , 2003 .

[17]  Hans Spada,et al.  Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Knowledge Communication , 2010 .

[18]  Susan C. Herring.  Interactional Coherence in CMC , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[20]  J. Roschelle.  Designing for cognitive communication: epistemic fidelity or mediating collaborative inquiry? , 1997, Computers, Communication and Mental Models.

[21]  Philip Bell,et al.  The knowledge integration environment: theory and design , 1995, CSCL.

[22]  Jim Hewitt.  How Habitual Online Practices Affect the Development of Asynchronous Discussion Threads , 2003 .

[23]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Collaborative representations: supporting face to face and online knowledge-building discourse , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  Michael Bieber,et al.  Collaborative Discourse Structures in Computer Mediated Group Communications , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Flexibly structuring the interaction in a CSCL environment , 1996 .

[26]  A. Veerman.  Constructive Discussions through Electronic Dialogue , 2003 .

[27]  Martin Wessner,et al.  Explicit referencing in chat supports collaborative learning , 2005, CSCL.

[28]  P. Robert-Jan Simons,et al.  The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[29]  Kristine Nagel,et al.  Integrating and guiding collaboration: lessons learned in computer-supported collaborative learning research at Georgia Tech , 1997, CSCL.