Sound Indicators: A Review for the Puget Sound Partnership

The Washington State Academy of Sciences (WSAS) is an organization of Washington State's leading scientists and engineers dedicated to serving the state with scientific counsel. Formed as a working academy, not an honorary society, WSAS is modeled on the National Research Council. Its mission is twofold: To provide expert scientific and engineering analysis to inform public policy making in Washington State, and To increase the role and visibility of science in the state. Washington and duly appointed by the governor. In April 2007, WSAS was constituted by the Secretary of State as a private, independent 501(c)(3). State University) provided useful suggestions that the Committee incorporated into the final report.

[1]  W. T. Edmondson.  The uses of ecology , 1991 .

[2]  J. Newton,et al.  A descriptive analysis of temporal and spatial patterns of variability in Puget Sound oceanographic properties , 2008 .

[3]  M. Willig.  Biodiversity and Productivity , 2011, Science.

[4]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change , 2012, Nature.

[5]  Vemap Participants.  Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project: Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doubling , 1995 .

[6]  James P. Bennett.  Ecological Indicators for the Nation: Committee to Evaluate Indicators for Monitoring Aquatic and Terrestrial Environments, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2000, 180 pp., cloth, ISBN 0-309-06845-2☆ , 2002 .

[7]  2013 Washington At-Sea Marbled Murrelet Population Monitoring: Research Progress Report , 2010 .

[8]  David Dicks.  Puget Sound Action Agenda: Protecting and Restoring the Puget Sound Ecosystem by 2020 , 2009 .

[9]  Naeem,et al.  Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis , 2005 .

[10]  R. M. Strickland,et al.  The fertile fjord : plankton in Puget Sound , 1983 .

[11]  R. Dinicola,et al.  Puget Sound Shorelines and the Impacts of Armoring-Proceedings of a State of the Science Workshop, May 2009 , 2010 .

[12]  C. T. de Wit,et al.  Philosophy and terminology , 1993 .

[13]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Tropical forest carbon assessment: integrating satellite and airborne mapping approaches , 2009 .

[14]  B. Columbia.,et al.  Ecosystem Status and Trends Report: Coastal Waters off the west coast of , 2010 .

[15]  G. Collatz,et al.  Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants , 1992 .

[16]  H. Lal,et al.  A conceptual model for the assessment of depressional wetlands in the prairie pothole region , 1995, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[17]  J. Newton,et al.  Implications of Observed Anthropogenic Changes to the Nearshore Ecosystems in Puget Sound , 2011 .

[18]  James S. Brennan.  Marine Riparian Vegetation Communities of Puget Sound , 2007 .

[19]  H. Mooney,et al.  Ecosystem services, targets, and indicators for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity , 2011 .

[20]  Terrestrial Environments,et al.  Ecological indicators for the nation , 2013 .

[21]  Puget Sound.  COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PUGET SOUND CHINOOK: HARVEST MANAGEMENT COMPONENT , 2004 .

[22]  C. S. Holling.  Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management , 2005 .

[23]  Shoreline Armoring,et al.  Puget Sound Partnership - Setting Targets for Dashboard Indicators , 2011 .

[24]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Managing troubled waters—The role of marine environmental monitoring , 1991 .

[25]  G. Daily,et al.  Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services , 2011 .

[26]  A. Norkko,et al.  Benthic diversity gradients and shifting baselines: implications for assessing environmental status. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  J. Knote.  Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community , 2004 .

[28]  J. Newton,et al.  Conceptual Model for Assessing Restoration of Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystems , 2006 .

[29]  Ismail Haji Ishak,et al.  Managing troubled waters: The role of marine environmental monitoring: Committee on a Systems Assessment of Marine Environmental Monitoring, National Research Council, USA , 1992 .

[30]  Peter B Adler,et al.  Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness , 2011, Science.

[31]  D. Doak,et al.  The Keystone-Species Concept in Ecology and ConservationManagement and policy must explicitly consider the complexity of interactions in natural systems , 1993 .

[32]  D. Penttila.  Marine Forage Fishes in Puget Sound , 2007 .

[33]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[34]  Rudolf de Groot,et al.  A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets , 2008 .

[35]  Michael J. Fogarty,et al.  Integrated ecosystem assessments , 2008 .

[36]  R. Huggett,et al.  Modelling the Human Impact on Nature: Systems Analysis of Environmental Problems , 1993 .

[37]  Brian W. Mar,et al.  Effects of urbanization on small streams in the Puget Sound Lowland Ecoregion , 1996 .