Bias Estimation for General Asynchronous Sensors

A novel solution is provided for the bias estimation problem in multiple asynchronous sensors using common targets of opportunity. The decoupling between the target state estimation and the sensor bias estimation is achieved without ignoring or approximating the crosscovariance between the state estimate and the bias estimate. The target data reported by the sensors are usually not time-coincident or synchronous due to the different data rates. Since the bias estimation requires time-coincident target data from different sensors, a novel scheme is used to transform the measurements from the different times of the sensors into pseudomeasurements of the sensor biases with additive noises that are zero-mean, white, and with easily calculated covariances. These results allow bias estimation as well as the evaluation of the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) on the covariance of the bias estimate, i.e., the quantification of the available information about the biases in any scenario. Monte Carlo simulation results show that the new method is statistically efficient, i.e., it meets the CRLB. The use of this technique for scale and sensor location biases in addition to the usual additive biases is also presented.

[1]  T. Zadra,et al.  Precision tracking of ground targets , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[2]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Exact multisensor dynamic bias estimation with local tracks , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[3]  Neil J. Gordon,et al.  Performance bounds for recursive sensor registration , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[4]  Henk A. P. Blom,et al.  Systematic error estimation in multisensor fusion systems , 1993, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[5]  Thiagalingam Kirubarajan,et al.  Multisensor bias estimation using local tracks without a priori association , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[6]  K. Kastella,et al.  Bias modeling and estimation for GMTI applications , 2000, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion.

[7]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom.  Airborne GMTI radar position bias estimation using static-rotator targets of opportunity , 2001 .

[8]  Lawrence D. Stone,et al.  Track-to-track association and bias removal , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[9]  Yakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Principles and Techniques , 1995 .

[10]  Ali T. Alouani,et al.  Sensor registration in multisensor systems , 1992, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[11]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Unbiased converted measurements for tracking , 1998 .

[12]  R. Bishop,et al.  Solution to a multisensor tracking problem with sensor registration errors , 1999 .

[13]  T. R. Rice,et al.  A Two-Stage Filter for State Estimation in the Presence of Dynamical Stochastic Bias , 1992, 1992 American Control Conference.

[14]  T. R. Rice,et al.  Removal of alignment errors in an integrated system of two 3-D sensors , 1993 .

[15]  D. W. McMichael,et al.  Maximum likelihood registration of dissimilar sensors , 1996, Proceeding of 1st Australian Data Fusion Symposium.

[16]  Samuel S. Blackman,et al.  Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems , 1999 .

[17]  B. Ristic,et al.  Maximum likelihood registration for multiple dissimilar sensors , 2003 .

[18]  B. Friedland.  Treatment of bias in recursive filtering , 1969 .

[19]  M. Ignagni.  An alternate derivation and extension of Friendland's two-stage Kalman estimator , 1981 .

[20]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software , 2001 .