Effects of Analogous Product Representation on Design-By-Analogy

Design-by-analogy is well-recognized for its power in innovation processes. Understanding the cognitive processes involved in the formation of analogies is important for understanding the concept generation process. This paper takes a distinctive interdisciplinary route to combine research in cognitive psychology and design to develop a more complete understanding design-by-analogy and to provide the basis for formal method development. Designers use numerous external representations in the design processes including, but not limited to, linguistic descriptions of the problems, diagrams and sketches. Information and prior solutions the designer has seen are examples of internal representation. Representation has significant impact on the design-by-analogy process. This paper presents experimental results showing that the representation of a product in a person’s memory and the representation of the design problem influence the person’s ability to solve the design problem based on an analogous product. This experiment shows that appropriate representations facilitate design-by-analogy. A more general semantic description of a product allows for a greater higher likelihood of using a previously experienced product as a source analogy. These results are significant findings, especially regarding their implications on innovation processes, design-by-analogy methods, and design-by-analogy tools. Future work includes experiments to gain a broader knowledge of useful representations, the development of design methods and experimental evaluation of the design-by-analogy methods.

[1]  D. Gentner,et al.  Avoiding Missed Opportunities in Managerial Life: Analogical Training More Powerful Than Individual Case Training , 2000 .

[2]  Preston G. Smith The art of innovation: lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm: Tom Kelley with Jonathan Littman; New York: Doubleday, 2001, 308 + xii pages, $26.00 , 2002 .

[3]  L. R. Novick Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices , 2004 .

[5]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education , 1999 .

[6]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Contents and Structure in Design Reasoning , 1998 .

[7]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences , 2004, Technometrics.

[8]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The analogical mind. , 1997 .

[9]  Peter Szolovits,et al.  What Is a Knowledge Representation? , 1993, AI Mag..

[10]  W. Gordon Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity , 1961 .

[11]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[12]  K. Wood,et al.  QUANTITATIVE MEASURES FOR DESIGN BY ANALOGY , 2000 .

[13]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[14]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The analogical mind. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[15]  C. Clement Effect of structural embedding on analogical transfer: manifest versus latent analogs , 1994 .

[16]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. , 1997 .

[17]  Victor V. Kryssanov,et al.  Understanding design fundamentals: how synthesis and analysis drive creativity, resulting in emergence , 2001, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[18]  Jyotsna Vaid,et al.  Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes , 2001 .

[19]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[20]  C. Schunn,et al.  Priming, analogy, and awareness in complex reasoning , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[21]  John R. Anderson A spreading activation theory of memory. , 1983 .

[22]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Biomimetic Concept Generation Applied to Design for Remanufacture , 2002 .

[23]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Kinds of Memory , 2001 .

[24]  Michael C. Quick,et al.  Invention and evolution — design in nature and engineering , 1995 .

[25]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  ANALOGICAL REMINDING: A GOOD MATCH IS HARD TO FIND. , 1985 .

[26]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[27]  C. Clement,et al.  The Effects of Manifest Relational Similarity on Analog Retrieval , 1994 .

[28]  J. Kolodner Educational implications of analogy. A view from case-based reasoning. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[29]  Kathy Potosnak,et al.  Conceptual design , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[30]  K. Dunbar,et al.  Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goals , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[31]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  K. Dunbar How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. , 1997 .

[33]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  The Structure-Mapping Engine * , 2003 .

[34]  Mao-Lin Chiu,et al.  Design moves in situated design with case-based reasoning , 2003 .

[35]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[36]  J. Dixon,et al.  Engineering Design , 2019, Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering.

[37]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..