Differences between dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators with cylindrical and rectangular exposed electrodes

Surface dielectric barrier discharges (DBDs) used as plasma actuators can induce significant time-averaged forces in nearby neutral gases. For single-barrier actuators (one electrode insulated) these forces are dependent on the geometry of the exposed electrode. We demonstrate that using thin cylindrical exposed electrodes can increase the induced force by several hundred percent compared with an actuator with a rectangular exposed electrode of the same thickness. This difference is due almost exclusively to the extent of the exposed electrode in the same direction as the gap between the two electrodes, which tends to be much longer for actuators constructed with rectangular exposed electrodes. The exact shape of the electrode cross-section plays no role. In addition, using an intensified digital camera we observed a new filament-free plasma that occurred only in discharges with exposed electrodes smaller than approximately 0.15 mm in diameter. These discharges spent an increasing fraction of the applied voltage period in this mode as we reduced the exposed electrode diameter. The mode shared several characteristics with a positive corona, and was partially responsible for a decrease in the electrical power used by these discharges.

[1]  Thomas McLaughlin,et al.  Time-correlated force production measurements of the dielectric barrier discharge plasma aerodynamic actuator , 2008 .

[2]  T. Corke,et al.  Separation Control on HIgh Angle of Attack Airfoil Using Plasma Actuators , 2004 .

[3]  Eric Moreau,et al.  Optimization of a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Actuator by Stattionary and Non-stationary Measurements of the Induced Flow Velocity - Application to Airflow Control , 2006 .

[4]  Antoine Rousseau,et al.  Spatio-temporal breakdown in surface DBDs: evidence of collective effect , 2007 .

[5]  T. Corke,et al.  Single dielectric barrier discharge plasma enhanced aerodynamics: physics, modeling and applications , 2009 .

[6]  Noah Hershkowitz,et al.  Microdischarge propagation and expansion in a surface dielectric barrier discharge , 2008 .

[7]  Eric Moreau,et al.  Airflow control by non-thermal plasma actuators , 2007 .

[8]  Eric Moreau,et al.  Asymmetric surface dielectric barrier discharge in air at atmospheric pressure: electrical properties and induced airflow characteristics , 2005 .

[9]  Takashi Abe,et al.  Experimental Study for Momentum Transfer in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuator , 2008 .

[10]  Eric Moreau,et al.  Positive and negative sawtooth signals applied to a DBD plasma actuator – influence on the electric wind , 2009 .

[11]  E. Moreau,et al.  Optimization of a dielectric barrier discharge actuator by stationary and non-stationary measurements of the induced flow velocity: application to airflow control , 2007 .

[12]  Noah Hershkowitz,et al.  Force measurements of single and double barrier DBD plasma actuators in quiescent air , 2008 .

[13]  Mikhail N. Shneider,et al.  Modeling of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator in air , 2008 .

[14]  L. C. Pitchford,et al.  Electrohydrodynamic force in dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators , 2007 .

[15]  Thomas Corke,et al.  Plasma Actuators for Separation Control of Low-Pressure Turbine Blades , 2006 .

[16]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  Plasma-Based Flow-Control Strategies for Transitional Highly Loaded Low-Pressure Turbines , 2008 .

[17]  E. Jumper,et al.  Mechanisms and Responses of a Dielectric Barrier Plasma Actuator: Geometric Effects , 2004 .