Experimental Validation of Doppler Echocardiographic Measurement of Volume Flow Through the Stenotic Aortic Valve

In aortic stenosis, evaluation of aortic valve area by the continuity equation assumes that the volume of flow through the stenotic valve can be measured accurately in the left ventricular outflow tract. To test the accuracy of Doppler volume-flow measurement proximal to a stenotic valve, we developed an open-chest canine model in which the native leaflets were sutured together to create variable degrees of acute aortic stenosis. Left ventricular and aortic pressures were measured with micromanometer-tipped catheters. Volume flow was controlled and varied by directing systemic venous return through a calibrated roller pump and back to the right atrium. Because transaortic volume flow will not equal roller pump output when there is coexisting aortic insufficiency (present in 67% of studies), transaortic flow was measured by electromagnetic flowmeter with the flow probe placed around the proximal descending thoracic aorta, just beyond the ligated arch vessels. In 12 adult, mongrel dogs (mean weight, 25 kg), the mean transaortic pressure gradient ranged from 2 to 74 mm Hg, and transaortic volume flow ranged from 0.9 to 3.2 l/min. In four dogs, electromagnetic flow that was measured distal to the valve was accurate compared with volume flow determined by timed collection of total aortic flow into a graduated cylinder (n = 24, r = 0.97, electromagnetic flow = 0.87 Direct +0.13 l/min). In eight subsequent dogs, electromagnetic flow was compared with transaortic cardiac output measured by Doppler echocardiography in the left ventricular outflow tract as circular cross-sectional area [pi(D/2)2] x left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral x heart rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  C Clark,et al.  The propagation of turbulence produced by a stenosis. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  M. Quiñones,et al.  Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. , 1986, Circulation.

[3]  When Should Doppler-Determined Valve Area Be Better Than the Gorlin Formula?: Variation in Hydraulic Constants in Low Flow States , 1987 .

[4]  L Hatle,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. , 1980, British heart journal.

[5]  M C Limacher,et al.  Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. , 1984, Circulation.

[6]  A. Tajik,et al.  Validation of instantaneous pressure gradients measured by continuous-wave Doppler in experimentally induced aortic stenosis. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  H Sandler,et al.  The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in man. , 1968, American heart journal.

[8]  S. C. Goldman,et al.  Effects of flow profile on electromagnetic flowmeter accuracy , 1963, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  M Berger,et al.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  F. Eckner,et al.  Development of a new model of subcoronary valvular aortic stenosis to create ventricular hypertrophy. , 1978, The Journal of surgical research.

[11]  P. Teirstein,et al.  Doppler echocardiographic measurement of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: a noninvasive application of the Gorlin formula. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Seward,et al.  Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. , 1985, Circulation.

[13]  Randolph P. Martin,et al.  Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  S. Sanders,et al.  Measurement of systemic and pulmonary blood flow and QP/QS ratio using Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  C. Otto,et al.  Limitations of Doppler measurement of volume flow in adults with aortic stenosis , 1986 .

[16]  J. Copeland,et al.  Experimental production of aortic valvular stenosis. Short-term and long-term studies in dogs. , 1974, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  M F O'ROURKE,et al.  DYNAMIC ACCURACY OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FLOWMETER. , 1965, Journal of applied physiology.

[18]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Evaluation of pulmonary and systemic blood flow by 2-dimensional Doppler echocardiography using fast Fourier transform spectral analysis. , 1982, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  I. Simpson,et al.  Clinical value of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of adults with aortic stenosis. , 1985, British heart journal.

[20]  R. Salerno The Experimental Production of Valvular Aortic Stenosis* , 1959, Annals of surgery.

[21]  M. Crawford,et al.  Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula. , 1985, Circulation.

[22]  R. S. Mitchell,et al.  When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula?: Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  M. Winniford,et al.  Analysis of factors affecting the variability of Fick versus indicator dilution measurements of cardiac output. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  M. Crawford,et al.  Calculation of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography: a direct application of the continuity equation. , 1986, Circulation.

[25]  J. Seward,et al.  Instantaneous pressure gradient: a simultaneous Doppler and dual catheter correlative study. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  A. Bove,et al.  A new technique for producing pure aortic stenosis in animals. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[27]  L. Hatle,et al.  Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. , 1985, British heart journal.

[28]  W. E. Medd,et al.  Dynamics of the circulation in aortic valvular disease. , 1955, The American journal of medicine.

[29]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Valvar subcoronary aortic stenosis in dogs. , 1979, The American journal of physiology.

[30]  L L Huntsman,et al.  Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  P. Teirstein,et al.  The accuracy of Doppler ultrasound measurement of pressure gradients across irregular, dual, and tunnellike obstructions to blood flow. , 1985, Circulation.

[32]  S. Goldberg,et al.  In vitro verification of Doppler prediction of transvalve pressure gradient and orifice area in stenosis. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  A. Weyman,et al.  Variable effects of changes in flow rate through the aortic, pulmonary and mitral valves on valve area and flow velocity: impact on quantitative Doppler flow calculations. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  L L Huntsman,et al.  Noninvasive Doppler Determination of Cardiac Output in Man: Clinical Validation , 1983, Circulation.

[35]  P. Yock,et al.  Comparison of Doppler-derived pressure gradient to that determined at cardiac catheterization in adults with aortic valve stenosis: implications for management. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[36]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Verification and Clinical Demonstration of the Echo Doppler Series Effect and Vortex Shed Distance , 1981, Circulation.

[37]  J. Elion,et al.  Correlation of continuous wave Doppler velocities with cardiac catheterization gradients: an experimental model of aortic stenosis. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[38]  R GORLIN,et al.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. , 1951, American heart journal.