An Investigation of the Effect of Lotteries on Web Survey Response Rates

Inspired by the positive effects of incentives on mail survey response rates, researchers have started using incentives to increase response rates to Web surveys. The established best practice of presending cash incentives is difficult to implement in Web surveys, and studies suggest that its presumed effects might not be witnessed in Web surveys. In contrast, several studies have found that lotteries can significantly increase Web survey response rates. Some authors have argued that this could reflect the fact that Internet users have come to expect Web surveys to be associated with lotteries. An experimental study among university students found that the lottery influences the Web survey response rates, but there are indications that different subgroups might be more influenced by this incentive than others. The observed differences are interpreted along the lines of possible differences in the degree to which different respondent groups expect incentives in return for their participation.

[1]  G. White,et al.  An On-Line Survey of Food and Beverage Consumers on the Internet: An Evaluation of the Survey Methodology , 1996 .

[2]  A. H. Church ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES: A META-ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[3]  M. Couper A REVIEW OF ISSUES AND APPROACHES , 2000 .

[4]  Daniel B. Horn,et al.  The Effects of Cash, Electronic, and Paper Gift Certificates as Respondent Incentives for a Web-Based Survey of Technologically Sophisticated Respondents , 2004 .

[5]  G. Loosveldt,et al.  The effect of personalization on response rates and data quality in web surveys , 2005 .

[6]  Russel L. Thompson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys , 2000 .

[7]  Tracy L. Tuten,et al.  Prepaid and Promised Incentives in Web Surveys , 2003 .

[8]  Geert Loosveldt,et al.  An evaluation of the semiautomatic login procedure to control web survey access , 2003 .

[9]  Kathleen Mcspurren,et al.  CHARITIES, NO; LOTTERIES, NO; CASH, YES MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS IN A CANADIAN INCENTIVES EXPERIMENT , 1996 .

[10]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips,et al.  Dimensions of Internet science , 2001 .

[11]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Methodological variables in Web-based research that may affect results: Sample type, monetary incentives, and personal information , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[12]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips,et al.  Financial Incentives, Personal Information and Drop Out in Online Studies , 2001 .

[13]  Brian H. Bornstein,et al.  Web-based research: Methodological variables’ effects on dropout and sample characteristics , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[14]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[15]  Michael S. Goodstadt,et al.  Mail Survey Response Rates: Their Manipulation and Impact , 1977 .

[16]  E. Singer,et al.  Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys. , 2000, Public opinion quarterly.

[17]  Stephen R. Porter,et al.  The Impact of Lottery Incentives on Student Survey Response Rates , 2003 .

[18]  Tracy L. Tuten,et al.  Effects of Immediate Versus Delayed Notification of Prize Draw Results on Response Behavior in Web Surveys , 2004 .

[19]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Design of Web Survey Questionnaires: Three Basic Experiments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Cihan Cobanoglu,et al.  The Effect of Incentives in Web Surveys: Application and Ethical Considerations , 2003 .

[21]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Influence : how and why people agree to things , 1985 .