Modeling of Filtration Processes-Microfiltration and Depth Filtration for Harvest of a Therapeutic Protein Expressed in Pichia pastoris at Constant Pressure.

Filtration steps are ubiquitous in biotech processes due to the simplicity of operation, ease of scalability and the myriad of operations that they can be used for. Microfiltration, depth filtration, ultrafiltration and diafiltration are some of the most commonly used biotech unit operations. For clean feed streams, when fouling is minimal, scaling of these unit operations is performed linearly based on the filter area per unit volume of feed stream. However, for cases when considerable fouling occurs, such as the case of harvesting a therapeutic product expressed in Pichia pastoris, linear scaling may not be possible and current industrial practices involve use of 20-30% excess filter area over and above the calculated filter area to account for the uncertainty in scaling. In view of the fact that filters used for harvest are likely to have a very limited lifetime, this oversizing of the filters can add considerable cost of goods for the manufacturer. Modeling offers a way out of this conundrum. In this paper, we examine feasibility of using the various proposed models for filtration of a therapeutic product expressed in Pichia pastoris at constant pressure. It is observed that none of the individual models yield a satisfactory fit of the data, thus indicating that more than one fouling mechanism is at work. Filters with smaller pores were found to undergo fouling via complete pore blocking followed by cake filtration. On the other hand, filters with larger pores were found to undergo fouling via intermediate pore blocking followed by cake filtration. The proposed approach can be used for more accurate sizing of microfilters and depth filters.

[1]  M. Hale,et al.  A preliminary study of depth filtration at a constant rate , 1961 .

[2]  J. Hermia,et al.  Constant Pressure Blocking Filtration Laws - Application To Power-law Non-newtonian Fluids , 1982 .

[3]  William C. Raschke,et al.  Recent Advances in the Expression of Foreign Genes in Pichia pastoris , 1993, Bio/Technology.

[4]  Antonio Hernández,et al.  Steps of membrane blocking in flux decline during protein microfiltration , 1995 .

[5]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Microfiltration of protein mixtures and the effects of yeast on membrane fouling , 1999 .

[6]  A. Zydney,et al.  A Combined Pore Blockage and Cake Filtration Model for Protein Fouling during Microfiltration. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[7]  M. Inan,et al.  Fermentation strategies for recombinant protein expression in the methylotrophic yeastPichia pastoris , 2000 .

[8]  K. Kobayashi,et al.  High-level expression of recombinant human serum albumin from the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris with minimal protease production and activation. , 2000, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[9]  J. Cregg,et al.  Recombinant protein expression in Pichia pastoris , 2000, Molecular biotechnology.

[10]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Analysis of humic acid fouling during microfiltration using a pore blockage-cake filtration model , 2002 .

[11]  H. Carrère,et al.  Modelling the microfiltration of lactic acid fermentation broths and comparison of operating modes , 2002 .

[12]  A. Hernández,et al.  Protein fouling in microfiltration: deposition mechanism as a function of pressure for different pH. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[13]  Karl Schick,et al.  Enhancing dead end filtration throughput using a non-traditional liquid handling procedure , 2003 .

[14]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Recombinant expression systems in the pharmaceutical industry , 2004, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[15]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Variations in backwash efficiency during colloidal filtration of hollow-fiber microfiltration membranes , 2005 .

[16]  Anurag S Rathore,et al.  Comparison of different options for harvest of a therapeutic protein product from high cell density yeast fermentation broth , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  Catherine Charcosset,et al.  Membrane processes in biotechnology: an overview. , 2006, Biotechnology advances.

[18]  Anurag Rathore,et al.  Harvest of a Therapeutic Protein Product from High Cell Density Fermentation Broths: Principles and Case Study , 2006 .

[19]  Ralf Kuriyel,et al.  Combined models of membrane fouling: Development and application to microfiltration and ultrafiltration of biological fluids , 2006 .

[20]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Bioprocess membrane technology , 2007 .

[21]  Pierre Aimar,et al.  Analysing flux decline in dead-end filtration , 2008 .

[22]  J. Tsubaki,et al.  Development of a high-performance cake-less continuous filtration system , 2008 .

[23]  Francis A. DiGiano,et al.  Fouling models for low-pressure membrane systems , 2009 .

[24]  Sven Reiser,et al.  Evaluation of disposable filtration systems for harvesting high cell density fed batch processes , 2011, BMC proceedings.

[25]  A S Rathore,et al.  RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MEMBRANE-BASED SEPARATIONS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY PROCESSES: REVIEW , 2011, Preparative biochemistry & biotechnology.

[26]  Kurt Brorson,et al.  Mechanistic modeling of viral filtration , 2014 .