Implied body action directs spatial attention

Research confirms that the body influences perception, but little is known about the embodiment of attention. We investigated whether the implied actions of others direct spatial attention, using a lateralized covert-orienting task with nonpredictive central cues depicting static, right/left-facing bodies poised in midaction. Validity effects (decreased response times for validly compared with invalidly cued trials) indicated orienting in the direction of the implied action. In Experiment 1, we compared action (running, throwing) with nonaction (standing) cues. Only the action cues produced validity effects, suggesting that implied action directs attention. The action cues produced faster responses overall, suggesting that action cues prime motor responses. In Experiment 2, we determined whether action cues shifted attention in a specific direction rather than to a general side of space: Two cues had similar action speed and motor effort but differed in implied direction (jumping, vertical; throwing, horizontal). Validity effects were found only for the throw cues for which the implied motion direction was consistent with lateralized target locations. In Experiment 3, we compared block-like stimuli to the throwing action stimuli to examine whether lower level perceptual information could account for the attention effects alone. Validity effects were found only for the human-action stimuli. Overall, the results suggest that predictive simulations of action shift attention in action-consistent directions.

[1]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Predicting the Effects of Actions: Interactions of Perception and Action , 2001, Psychological science.

[2]  L. Barsalou Situated simulation in the human conceptual system , 2003 .

[3]  Michael F. Land,et al.  There's more to magic than meets the eye , 2006, Current Biology.

[4]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Watching Others' Actions: Mirror Representations in the Parietal Cortex , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[5]  S. Palmer What makes triangles point: Local and global effects in configurations of ambiguous triangles , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it!: An fMRI investigation , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[7]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Activation in Human MT/MST by Static Images with Implied Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[9]  Jefferson D. Grubb,et al.  Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[11]  M. Wilson,et al.  Perceiving imitatible stimuli: consequences of isomorphism between input and output. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[13]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  The mirror system in humans , 2002 .

[15]  J. Hietanen,et al.  Social attention orienting integrates visual information from head and body orientation , 2002, Psychological research.

[16]  S P Tipper,et al.  Action-based mechanisms of attention. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Catherine L. Reed,et al.  Trunk Orientation Induces Neglect-Like Lateral Biases in Covert Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[19]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Visual prediction: Psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  V. Bruce,et al.  You must see the point: automatic processing of cues to the direction of social attention. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Attention, Researchers! It Is Time to Take a Look at the Real World , 2003 .

[23]  J. Freyd,et al.  The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  V. Bruce,et al.  Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  A. Treisman,et al.  Attention, Space, and Action: Studies in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2001 .

[26]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Recognizing people from their movement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[28]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Reaching Out to See: Arm Position Can Attenuate Human Visual Loss , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.