Two more possible pitfalls of rapid prenatal diagnostics using interphase nuclei
暂无分享,去创建一个
T. Liehr | U. Claussen | I. Schreyer | M. Ziegler | H. Starke | A. Heller | A. Nietzel | V. Beensen | A. Neumann | Isabell Hartmann
[1] P. Cotter,et al. Heteromorphisms of chromosome 18 can obscure detection of fetal aneuploidy by interphase FISH , 2001, Prenatal diagnosis.
[2] J. Delhanty. An atlas of preimplantation genetic diagnosis , 2001 .
[3] T. Liehr,et al. Pitfalls of rapid prenatal diagnosis using the interphase nucleus , 2001, Prenatal diagnosis.
[4] P. N. Rao,et al. Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2‐year multi‐center retrospective study and review of the literature , 2001, Prenatal diagnosis.
[5] F. Bieber,et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for rapid detection of aneuploidy: experience in 911 prenatal cases † , 2001, Prenatal diagnosis.
[6] J. Epplen,et al. False‐negative finding in rapid interphase FISH analysis of uncultured amniotic cells , 1999, Prenatal diagnosis.
[7] A. N. Lamb,et al. Overwhelming maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples from patients with oligohydramnios can lead to false prenatal interphase FISH results , 1999, Prenatal diagnosis.
[8] B. Eiben,et al. A prospective comparative study on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of uncultured amniocytes and standard karyotype analysis , 1998, Prenatal diagnosis.
[9] R. Murray,et al. THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF VISUAL MEDICINE SERIES , 2003 .
[10] T. Liehr,et al. Translocation trisomy dup(21q) and free trisomy 21 can be distinguished by interphase-FISH. , 1999, International journal of molecular medicine.