Decomposing the efficient frontier of the DEA production possibility set into a smallest number of convex polyhedrons by mixed integer programming

This paper extends the works by Olesen and Petersen (2003), Russell and Schworm (2006) and Cooper et al. (2007) about describing the efficient frontier of a production possibility set by the intersection of a finite number of closed halfspaces, in several ways. First, we decompose the efficient frontier into a smallest number of convex polyhedrons, or equivalently into a new class of efficient faces, called maximal efficient faces (MEFs). Second, we show how to identify all MEFs even if full dimensional efficient faces do not exist. Third, by applying the MEF decomposition to various real-world data sets, we demonstrate the validity of the MEF decomposition and how it can contribute to the DEA literature. Finally, we illustrate how to use the identified MEFs in practice.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[2]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[3]  Anthony M. Santomero,et al.  DETERMINING AN OPTIMAL CAPITAL STANDARD FOR THE BANKING INDUSTRY , 1977 .

[4]  Hervé Leleu,et al.  Dual Representations of Non-Parametric Technologies and Measurement of Technical Efficiency , 2003 .

[5]  Olvi L. Mangasarian,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1969 .

[6]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking , 1992 .

[7]  Philippe Lacomme,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms for periodic arc routing problems , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Gérard Cornuéjols,et al.  Valid inequalities for mixed integer linear programs , 2007, Math. Program..

[9]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Identification and Use of Efficient Faces and Facets in DEA , 2003 .

[10]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA , 2007 .

[11]  C. W. Sealey,et al.  Inputs, Outputs, and a Theory of Production and Cost at Depository Financial Institutions , 1977 .

[12]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[13]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  A pareto race , 1988 .

[14]  Hirofumi Fukuyama,et al.  Technical and scale efficiency of Japanese commerical banks: a non-parametric approach , 1993 .

[15]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Indicators of ill-conditioned data sets and model misspecification in data envelopment analysis: an extended facet approach , 1996 .

[16]  Hirofumi Fukuyama,et al.  Estimating output gains by means of Luenberger efficiency measures , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Akiko Takeda,et al.  On measuring the inefficiency with the inner-product norm in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Chulwoo Baek,et al.  The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[19]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models , 1998, Oper. Res. Lett..

[20]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Choosing weights from alternative optimal solutions of dual multiplier models in DEA , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..