An investigation of lucky imaging techniques

We present an empirical analysis of the effectiveness of frame selection (also known as Lucky Imaging) techniques for high resolution imaging. A high-speed image recording system has been used to observe a number of bright stars. The observations were made over a wide range of values of D/r0 and exposure time. The improvement in Strehl ratio of the stellar images due to aligning frames and selecting the best frames was evaluated as a function of these parameters. We find that improvement in Strehl ratio by factors of 4 to 6 can be achieved over a range of D/r0 from 3 to 12, with a slight peak at D/r0 � 7. The best Strehl improvement is achieved with exposure times of 10 ms or less but significant improvement is still obtained at exposure times as long as 640 ms. Our results are consistent with previous investigations but cover a much wider range of parameter space. We show that Strehl ratios of >0.7 can be achieved in appropiate conditions whereas previous studies have generally shown maximum Strehl ratios of �0.3. The results are in reasonable agreement with the simulations of Baldwin, Warner & Mackay (2008).

[1]  Scott W. Teare,et al.  Ground-based High-Resolution Imaging of Mercury , 2000 .

[2]  Craig D. Mackay,et al.  The point spread function in Lucky Imaging and variations in seeing on short timescales , 2008 .

[3]  Nitin Sampat,et al.  Sensors and Camera Systems for Scientific, Industrial, and Digital Photography Applications , 2000 .

[4]  R. Schödel The Universe under the Microscope: Astrophysics at High Angular Resolution , 2009 .

[5]  New images of mercury's surface from 210° to 290° W longitudes with implications for Mercury's global asymmetry , 2007 .

[6]  Chris Biemesderfer,et al.  Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X , 2001 .

[7]  Jan Swevers,et al.  Ground-based and airborne instrumentation for astronomy , 2010 .

[8]  D. Fried Probability of getting a lucky short-exposure image through turbulence* , 1978 .

[9]  H. Payne,et al.  Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X , 2001 .

[10]  C Martin,et al.  Temporal coherence of individual turbulent patterns in atmospheric seeing. , 2000, Applied optics.

[11]  Cambridge,et al.  Lucky imaging: High angular resolution imaging in the visible from the ground , 2005, astro-ph/0507299.

[12]  G. C. Cox,et al.  Diffraction-limited 800 nm imaging with the 2.56 m Nordic Optical Telescope , 2001, astro-ph/0101408.

[13]  D. Fried Optical Resolution Through a Randomly Inhomogeneous Medium for Very Long and Very Short Exposures , 1966 .

[14]  G. Cecil,et al.  A Side of Mercury Not Seen by Mariner 10 , 2007, 0708.0146.

[15]  Keith Shortridge,et al.  The data flow system for the AAO2 controllers , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[16]  Hilton Lewis,et al.  Advanced software, control, and communication systems for astronomy : 21-22 June 2004, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom , 2004 .

[17]  D. L. Fried,et al.  Optical heterodyne detection of an atmospherically distorted signal wave front , 1967 .

[18]  Rafael Rebolo,et al.  FastCam: a new lucky imaging instrument for medium-sized telescopes , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[19]  Ray Bell,et al.  Subelectron read noise at MHz pixel rates , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[20]  B. Welsh,et al.  Imaging Through Turbulence , 1996 .