Modulation of intrinsic resting-state fMRI networks in women with chronic migraine

Objective: To evaluate the intrinsic resting functional connectivity of the default mode network (DMN), salience network (SN), and central executive network (CEN) network in women with chronic migraine (CM), and whether clinical features are associated with such abnormalities. Methods: We analyzed resting-state connectivity in 29 women with CM as compared to age- and sex-matched controls. Relationships between clinical characteristics and changes in targeted networks connectivity were evaluated using a multivariate linear regression model. Results: All 3 major intrinsic brain networks were less coherent in CM (DMN: p = 0.030, SN: p = 0.007, CEN: p = 0.002) as compared to controls. When stratified based on medication overuse headache (MOH) status, CM without MOH (DMN: p = 0.029, SN: p = 0.023, CEN: p = 0.003) and CM with MOH (DMN: p = 0.016, SN: p = 0.016, CEN: p = 0.015) were also less coherent as compared to controls. There was no difference in CM with MOH as compared to CM without MOH (DMN: p = 0.382, SN: p = 0.408, CEN: p = 0.419). The frequency of moderate and severe headache days was associated with decreased connectivity in SN (p = 0.003) and CEN (p = 0.015), while cutaneous allodynia was associated with increased connectivity in SN (p = 0.011). Conclusions: Our results demonstrated decreased overall resting-state functional connectivity of the 3 major intrinsic brain networks in women with CM, and these patterns were associated with frequency of moderate to severe headache and cutaneous allodynia.

[1]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R Melzack,et al.  Evolution of pain theories. , 1970, International anesthesiology clinics.

[3]  E. Knudsen Fundamental components of attention. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  M. Ferrari,et al.  Cutaneous allodynia as a predictor of migraine chronification. , 2013, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  M. Heinricher,et al.  Beyond Neurovascular: Migraine as a Dysfunctional Neurolimbic Pain Network , 2012, Headache.

[6]  R. Sternbach Psychophysiology of Pain , 1975, International journal of psychiatry in medicine.

[7]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. , 2001, Journal of general internal medicine.

[8]  R. Lipton,et al.  Cutaneous allodynia in the migraine population , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[9]  Nasim Maleki,et al.  What Have We Learned From Brain Functional Connectivity Studies in Migraine Headache? , 2016, Headache.

[10]  F. Esposito,et al.  Abnormal Connectivity Within Executive Resting‐State Network in Migraine With Aura , 2015, Headache.

[11]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Permutation inference for the general linear model , 2014, NeuroImage.

[12]  Jie Tian,et al.  Intrinsic Brain Network Abnormalities in Migraines without Aura Revealed in Resting-State fMRI , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  A. Dowson,et al.  A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6™ , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[14]  K. Davis,et al.  The dynamic pain connectome , 2015, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  V. Menon,et al.  Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[16]  Catherine D. Chong,et al.  Functional imaging and migraine: new connections? , 2015, Current opinion in neurology.

[17]  David A. Freedman,et al.  A Nonstochastic Interpretation of Reported Significance Levels , 1983 .

[18]  G. Cosentino,et al.  Cyclical changes of cortical excitability and metaplasticity in migraine: Evidence from a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2014, PAIN®.

[19]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Chourouk Mzahi Reshaping the Village Test for investigating service brand attachment , 2014 .

[21]  E. Rostrup,et al.  Change in brain network connectivity during PACAP38-induced migraine attacks , 2016, Neurology.

[22]  R. Lipton,et al.  Headache Impact of Chronic and Episodic Migraine: Results From the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study , 2012, Headache.

[23]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Spontaneous Neural Dynamics and Multi-scale Network Organization , 2016, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[24]  M. Raichle,et al.  Resting-state activity in development and maintenance of normal brain function , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  R. Malenka,et al.  Drug-Evoked Synaptic Plasticity in Addiction: From Molecular Changes to Circuit Remodeling , 2011, Neuron.

[26]  Catherine D. Chong,et al.  Functional MRI of migraine , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[27]  A. May,et al.  Chronic migraine: risk factors, mechanisms and treatment , 2016, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[28]  J. Olesen,et al.  New Appendix Criteria Open for a Broader Concept of Chronic Migraine , 2006, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[29]  B. Schlaggar,et al.  Atypical Resting‐State Functional Connectivity of Affective Pain Regions in Chronic Migraine , 2013, Headache.

[30]  R. Al-Hasani,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of opioid receptor-dependent signaling and behavior. , 2011, Anesthesiology.