Long-term geochemical evolution of the near field repository: insights from reactive transport modelling and experimental evidences.

The KBS-3 underground nuclear waste repository concept designed by the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (SKB) includes a bentonite buffer barrier surrounding the copper canisters and the iron insert where spent nuclear fuel will be placed. Bentonite is also part of the backfill material used to seal the access and deposition tunnels of the repository. The bentonite barrier has three main safety functions: to ensure the physical stability of the canister, to retard the intrusion of groundwater to the canisters, and in case of canister failure, to retard the migration of radionuclides to the geosphere. Laboratory experiments (< 10 years long) have provided evidence of the control exerted by accessory minerals and clay surfaces on the pore water chemistry. The evolution of the pore water chemistry will be a primordial factor on the long-term stability of the bentonite barrier, which is a key issue in the safety assessments of the KBS-3 concept. In this work we aim to study the long-term geochemical evolution of bentonite and its pore water in the evolving geochemical environment due to climate change. In order to do this, reactive transport simulations are used to predict the interaction between groundwater and bentonite which is simulated following two different pathways: (1) groundwater flow through the backfill in the deposition tunnels, eventually reaching the top of the deposition hole, and (2) direct connection between groundwater and bentonite rings through fractures in the granite crosscutting the deposition hole. The influence of changes in climate has been tested using three different waters interacting with the bentonite: present-day groundwater, water derived from ice melting, and deep-seated brine. Two commercial bentonites have been considered as buffer material, MX-80 and Deponit CA-N, and one natural clay (Friedland type) for the backfill. They show differences in the composition of the exchangeable cations and in the accessory mineral content. Results from the simulations indicate that pore water chemistry is controlled by the equilibrium with the accessory minerals, especially carbonates. pH is buffered by precipitation/dissolution of calcite and dolomite, when present. The equilibrium of these minerals is deeply influenced by gypsum dissolution and cation exchange reactions in the smectite interlayer. If carbonate minerals are initially absent in bentonite, pH is then controlled by surface acidity reactions in the hydroxyl groups at the edge sites of the clay fraction, although its buffering capacity is not as strong as the equilibrium with carbonate minerals. The redox capacity of the bentonite pore water system is mainly controlled by Fe(II)-bearing minerals (pyrite and siderite). Changes in the groundwater composition lead to variations in the cation exchange occupancy, and dissolution-precipitation of carbonate minerals and gypsum. The most significant changes in the evolution of the system are predicted when ice-melting water, which is highly diluted and alkaline, enters into the system. In this case, the dissolution of carbonate minerals is enhanced, increasing pH in the bentonite pore water. Moreover, a rapid change in the population of exchange sites in the smectite is expected due to the replacement of Na for Ca.

[1]  R. A. Robie,et al.  Thermodynamic properties of minerals and related substances at 298.15 K (25.0 C) and one atmosphere (1.013 bars) pressure and at higher temperatures , 1968 .

[2]  M. Jansson,et al.  Long term test of buffer material : Final report on the pilot parcels , 2000 .

[3]  R. A. Robie,et al.  Thermodynamic properties of minerals and related substances at 298.15 K and 1 bar (10[5] pascals) pressure and at higher temperatures , 1995 .

[4]  R. Berner thermodynamic stability of sedimentary iron sulfides , 1967 .

[5]  M. Bradbury,et al.  A mechanistic description of Ni and Zn sorption on Na-montmorillonite Part II: modelling , 1997 .

[6]  J. Ganor,et al.  Smectite dissolution kinetics at 80°C and pH 8.8 , 2000 .

[7]  P. Wersin Geochemical modelling of bentonite porewater in high-level waste repositories. , 2003, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[8]  R. Alexander,et al.  Natural Analogue Studies in the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Wastes , 1994 .

[9]  David L. Parkhurst,et al.  Revised chemical equilibrium data for major water-mineral reactions and their limitations , 1990 .

[10]  H Wanner,et al.  An integrated sorption-diffusion model for the calculation of consistent distribution and diffusion coefficients in compacted bentonite. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[11]  N. Michau,et al.  Modeling of transport and reaction in an engineered barrier for radioactive waste confinement , 2005 .

[12]  Are all smectite clays suitable as “buffers”? , 2007 .

[13]  S. Olsson,et al.  Experimentally determined swelling pressures and geochemical interactions of compacted Wyoming bentonite with highly alkaline solutions , 2007 .

[14]  M. Shibata,et al.  Thermodynamic modeling and sensitivity analysis of porewater chemistry in compacted bentonite , 2004 .

[15]  T. Sandén,et al.  Mixing and sulphate‐reducing activity of bacteria in swelling, compacted bentonite clay under high‐level radioactive waste repository conditions , 2000, Journal of applied microbiology.

[16]  E. Hoehn,et al.  The Grimsel Migration Experiment: field injection–withdrawal experiments in fractured rock with sorbing tracers , 1998 .

[17]  L. N. Plummer,et al.  The solubilities of calcite, aragonite and vaterite in CO2-H2O solutions between 0 and 90°C, and an evaluation of the aqueous model for the system CaCO3-CO2-H2O , 1982 .

[18]  Mark A. Williamson,et al.  The kinetics and electrochemical rate-determining step of aqueous pyrite oxidation , 1994 .

[19]  D. L. Parkhurst,et al.  User's guide to PHREEQC (Version 2)-a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations , 1999 .

[20]  Paul Wersin,et al.  Performance of the bentonite barrier at temperatures beyond 100 °C: A critical review , 2007 .

[21]  E. Wieland,et al.  A surface chemical model of the bentonite-water interface and its implications for modelling the near field chemistry in a repository for spent fuel. , 1994 .

[22]  M. Bradbury,et al.  Analysis of the porewater chemical composition of a Spanish compacted bentonite used in an engineered barrier , 2004 .

[23]  C.A.J. Appelo,et al.  Modelling bentonite–water interactions at high solid/liquid ratios: swelling and diffuse double layer effects , 2004 .

[24]  Siv Olsson,et al.  Mineralogy and sealing properties of various bentonites and smectite-rich clay materials , 2007 .

[25]  A. Muurinen,et al.  Porewater chemistry in compacted bentonite , 1999 .