Critical Issues in an Electronic Documentation System

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA), of the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs has instituted a medical record (EMR) that includes electronic documentation of all narrative components of the medical record. To support clinicians using the system, multiple efforts have been instituted to ease the creation of narrative reports. Although electronic documentation is easier to read and improves access to information, it also may create new and additional hazards for users. This study is the first step in a series of studies to evaluate the issues surrounding the creation and use of electronic documentation. Eighty-eight providers across multiple clinical roles were interviewed in 10 primary care sites in the VA system. Interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed for themes. In addition, specific questions were asked about perceived harm due to electronic documentation practices. Five themes relating to difficulties with electronic documentation were identified: 1) information overload; 2) hidden information; 3) lack of trust; 4) communication; 5) decision-making. Three providers reported that they knew of an incident where current documentation practices had caused patient harm and over 75% of respondents reported significant mis-trust of the system.

[1]  Marc Berg,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  Arie Hasman,et al.  The granularity of medical narratives and its effect on the speed and completeness of information retrieval. , 1998, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[3]  M. Patton Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[4]  P. C. Tang,et al.  Research Paper: Use of Computer-based Records, Completeness of Documentation, and Appropriateness of Documented Clinical Decisions , 1999, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  J F Hurdle,et al.  Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors. , 2003, Methods of information in medicine.

[6]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. , 2004, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[7]  E Nygren,et al.  Reading the medical record. I. Analysis of physicians' ways of reading the medical record. , 1992, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[8]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[9]  Kenric W. Hammond,et al.  Are Electronic Medical Records Trustworthy? Observations on Copying, Pasting and Duplication , 2003, AMIA.

[10]  P. Gorman,et al.  Perceptions of physician order entry: results of a cross-site qualitative study. , 2003, Methods of information in medicine.

[11]  Marc Berg,et al.  Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.