Evaluating the impact of interdisciplinary networking in environmental geochemistry and health: reviewing SEGH conferences and workshops

The Society for Environmental Geochemistry and Health (SEGH) is a forum for multidisciplinary interaction relating the geochemical environment to health. With national funding, SEGH identified collaborative opportunities through the MULTITUDE series of workshops (2007–2011). We reviewed the meetings by electronic questionnaire (39 % response). Smaller meetings saw most returning delegates, suggesting networking and personal interaction is a key positive feature of SEGH; 31 % of practitioners and 25 % of academics participated in more than one meeting. Collaboration between SEGH participants resulted in joint funding (13 academics, 4 practitioners, 1 other) and joint papers (19, 5, 3). Evidence of behavioural change was seen in comments in five themes regarding the impacts of the conferences: support for current direction; impact on education practice (academics); new approaches; networking; multidisciplinary work. Multidisciplinary meetings and resulting networking were seen as having real value by many respondents, who encouraged further active pursuit of these activities. SEGH is eager to continue these activities which transform research, education and practice, resulting in a better understanding of the structure and processes comprising the broad geochemical environment on health. Comments showed the value and strength of small, well-organised conferences, bringing together a mixed group of disciplines, both research and applied, in a relaxed atmosphere. The absence of serious negative critique along with clear, positive comments suggests that there is a substantial level of support for, and even pleasure in, SEGH multidisciplinary conferences and workshops over the past years. It is encouraging that annual European conferences are viewed as such a positive achievement.

[1]  A. McFadyen,et al.  The Readiness for interprofessional learning scale: A possible more stable sub-scale model for the original version of RIPLS , 2005, Journal of interprofessional care.

[2]  Ann Bowling,et al.  Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services , 1997 .

[3]  J. Carter,et al.  Towards the development of a multidisciplinary understanding of the effects of toxic chemical mixtures on health , 2009, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[4]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  R. Calderon,et al.  Arsenic : exposure and health effects , 1997 .

[6]  Donald L. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels , 2009 .

[7]  V. Curran,et al.  Evaluation of an interprofessional collaboration workshop for post-graduate residents, nursing and allied health professionals , 2010, Journal of interprofessional care.

[8]  C. Hendry,et al.  Research Methods in Health. Investigating Health and Health Services (Second Edition) Research Methods in Health. Investigating Health and Health Services Ann Bowling Open University Press 429 £22.50 0335206433 0335206433. , 2003, Nurse researcher.

[9]  D. Raffaelli,et al.  Enhancing the effectiveness of policy-relevant integrative research in rural areas , 2009 .

[10]  Michael H Ramsey,et al.  Uncertainty in the assessment of hazard, exposure and risk , 2009, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[11]  R D Tyagi,et al.  Chemical and biological leaching of aluminum from red mud. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Nicole Schepker Educating the Next Generation of Makers. , 2014 .

[13]  B. E. Davies,et al.  Guidelines for lead in soil. Proposal of the Society for Environmental Geochemistry and Health , 1994 .

[14]  J. G. Farmer,et al.  Strategies for improving human health in contaminated situations: a review of past, present and possible future approaches , 2009, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[15]  M. Huby,et al.  Interdisciplinarity and participatory approaches to environmental health , 2009, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[16]  A. Bowling Research Methods in Health , 1998 .

[17]  Clive E Sabel,et al.  Uncertainty in epidemiology and health risk and impact assessment , 2009, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[18]  Andrew Donaldson,et al.  Mess among Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity in Environmental Research , 2010 .

[19]  Peter J. Taylor,et al.  Cultivating Collaborators: Concepts and Questions Emerging Interactively from an Evolving, Interdisciplinary Workshop , 2011 .

[20]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Design of Web Survey Questionnaires: Three Basic Experiments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  S. Reeves,et al.  A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9 , 2007, Medical teacher.

[22]  G. Parsell,et al.  The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS) , 1999, Medical education.

[23]  E. Schuepbach,et al.  Educating the next generation of atmospheric scientists within a European Network of Excellence , 2009 .

[24]  A. Hursthouse,et al.  Transport and dynamics of toxic pollutants in the natural environment and their effect on human health: research gaps and challenge , 2009, Environmental geochemistry and health.