Detailed data is welcome, but with a pinch of salt: Accuracy, precision, and uncertainty in flood inundation modeling

New survey techniques provide a large amount of high‐resolution data, which can be extremely precious for flood inundation modeling. Such data availability raises the issue as to how to exploit their information content to effectively improve flood risk mapping and predictions. In this paper, we will discuss a number of important issues which should be taken into account in works related to flood modeling. These include the large number of uncertainty sources in model structure and available data; the difficult evaluation of model results, due to the scarcity of observed data; computational efficiency; false confidence that can be given by high‐resolution outputs, as accuracy is not necessarily increased by higher precision. Finally, we briefly review and discuss a number of existing approaches, such as subgrid parameterization and roughness upscaling methods, which can be used to incorporate high detailed data into flood inundation models, balancing efficiency and reliability.

[1]  F. Dottori,et al.  Investigating the influence of minor hydraulic structures on modeling flood events in lowland areas , 2014 .

[2]  Ezio Todini,et al.  Testing a simple 2D hydraulic model in an urban flood experiment , 2013 .

[3]  Pierluigi Claps,et al.  Reconstruction and analysis of the Po River inundation of 1951 , 2013 .

[4]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  A Change Detection Approach to Flood Mapping in Urban Areas Using TerraSAR-X , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Giuliano Di Baldassarre,et al.  Uncertainty in design flood profiles derived by hydraulic modelling , 2012 .

[6]  P. Bates,et al.  A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas , 2012 .

[7]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  How much physical complexity is needed to model flood inundation? , 2012 .

[8]  Jochen E. Schubert,et al.  Building treatments for urban flood inundation models and implications for predictive skill and modeling efficiency , 2012 .

[9]  F. Silvestro,et al.  An Hydrological Description of the 4th November 2011 event in Genoa , 2012 .

[10]  Dragan Savic,et al.  A coarse-grid approach to representing building blockage effects in 2D urban flood modelling , 2012 .

[11]  Vincent Guinot,et al.  Multiple porosity shallow water models for macroscopic modelling of urban floods , 2012 .

[12]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Near Real-Time Flood Detection in Urban and Rural Areas Using High-Resolution Synthetic Aperture Radar Images , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  C. Aricò,et al.  MAST-2D diffusive model for flood prediction on domains with triangular Delaunay unstructured meshes , 2011 .

[14]  P. Bates,et al.  The accuracy of sequential aerial photography and SAR data for observing urban flood dynamics, a case study of the UK summer 2007 floods , 2011 .

[15]  J. Neal,et al.  Evaluating a new LISFLOOD‐FP formulation with data from the summer 2007 floods in Tewkesbury, UK , 2011 .

[16]  M. Ek,et al.  Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water , 2011 .

[17]  S. Kanae,et al.  A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model , 2011 .

[18]  P. Bates,et al.  Timely Low Resolution SAR Imagery To Support Floodplain Modelling: a Case Study Review , 2011 .

[19]  C. Sampson,et al.  Benchmarking urban flood models of varying complexity and scale using high resolution terrestrial LiDAR data , 2011 .

[20]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Interactions between subgrid‐scale resolution, feature representation and grid‐scale resolution in flood inundation modelling , 2011 .

[21]  Francesco Dottori,et al.  Developments of a flood inundation model based on the cellular automata approach: Testing different methods to improve model performance , 2011 .

[22]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Selecting the appropriate hydraulic model structure using low-resolution satellite imagery , 2011 .

[23]  J. Eischeid,et al.  Homogeneity of Gridded Precipitation Datasets for the Colorado River Basin , 2010 .

[24]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Modelling the hydraulics of the Carlisle 2005 flood event , 2010 .

[25]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  A comparison of three parallelisation methods for 2D flood inundation models , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  Gareth Pender,et al.  Benchmarking of 2D hydraulic modelling packages , 2010 .

[27]  B. Sanders,et al.  Two-dimensional, high-resolution modeling of urban dam-break flooding: A case study of Baldwin Hills, California , 2009 .

[28]  P. Bates,et al.  Distributed whole city water level measurements from the Carlisle 2005 urban flood event and comparison with hydraulic model simulations , 2009 .

[29]  Heiko Apel,et al.  Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? , 2009 .

[30]  Luis Cea,et al.  Unstructured finite volume discretization of two‐dimensional depth‐averaged shallow water equations with porosity , 2009 .

[31]  P. Bates,et al.  Evaluating the effect of scale in flood inundation modelling in urban environments , 2008 .

[32]  B. Sanders,et al.  Unstructured mesh generation and landcover-based resistance for hydrodynamic modeling of urban flooding , 2008 .

[33]  B. Sanders,et al.  Integral formulation of shallow-water equations with anisotropic porosity for urban flood modeling , 2008 .

[34]  Matthew D. Wilson,et al.  Case Study of the Use of Remotely Sensed Data for Modeling Flood Inundation on the River Severn, U.K. , 2008 .

[35]  Julien Lhomme,et al.  Two-dimensional shallow-water model with porosity for urban flood modelling , 2008 .

[36]  Matthew D. Wilson,et al.  Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review , 2007 .

[37]  James Brasington,et al.  Reduced complexity strategies for modelling urban floodplain inundation , 2007 .

[38]  P. Bates,et al.  Comparing the performance of a 2‐D finite element and a 2‐D finite volume model of floodplain inundation using airborne SAR imagery , 2007 .

[39]  Gareth Pender,et al.  Sub-grid scale parameterisation of 2D hydrodynamic models of inundation in the urban area , 2007 .

[40]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards integrated environmental models of everywhere: uncertainty, data and modelling as a learning process , 2007 .

[41]  P. Bates,et al.  Reach scale floodplain inundation dynamics observed using airborne synthetic aperture radar imagery: Data analysis and modelling , 2006 .

[42]  A. Paquier,et al.  Modeling floods in a dense urban area using 2D shallow water equations , 2006 .

[43]  Christopher Daly,et al.  Guidelines for assessing the suitability of spatial climate data sets , 2006 .

[44]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two‐dimensional diffusion‐wave treatment, part 2: development of a sub‐grid‐scale treatment , 2006 .

[45]  S. Lane,et al.  Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two‐dimensional diffusion‐wave treatment, part 1: mesh resolution effects , 2006 .

[46]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Hydrologic synthesis: Across processes, places, and scales , 2006 .

[47]  Michael Smith,et al.  Comment on ‘Analysis and modeling of flooding in urban drainage systems’ , 2006 .

[48]  V. Guinot,et al.  Flux and source term discretization in two‐dimensional shallow water models with porosity on unstructured grids , 2006 .

[49]  S. Blazková,et al.  Spatially distributed observations in constraining inundation modelling uncertainties , 2005 .

[50]  P. Bates,et al.  Utility of different data types for calibrating flood inundation models within a GLUE framework , 2005 .

[51]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Remote sensing and flood inundation modelling , 2004 .

[52]  Keith Beven,et al.  Estimation of flood inundation probabilities as conditioned on event inundation maps , 2003 .

[53]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling , 2000 .

[54]  T. Chang,et al.  Inundation simulation for urban drainage basin with storm sewer system , 2000 .