Rats' performance on variable-interval schedules with a linear feedback loop between response rate and reinforcement rate.

Three experiments investigated whether rats are sensitive to the molar properties of a variable-interval (VI) schedule with a positive relation between response rate and reinforcement rate (i.e., a VI+ schedule). In Experiment 1, rats responded faster on a variable ratio (VR) schedule than on a VI+ schedule with an equivalent feedback function. Reinforced interresponse times (IRTs) were shorter on the VR as compared to the VI+ schedule. In Experiments 2 and 3, there was no systematic difference in response rates maintained by a VI+ schedule and a VI schedule yoked in terms of reinforcement rate. This was found both when the yoking procedure was between-subject (Experiment 2) and within-subject (Experiment 3). Mean reinforced IRTs were similar on both the VI+ and yoked VI schedules, but these values were more variable on the VI+ schedule. These results provided no evidence that rats are sensitive to the feedback function relating response rate to reinforcement rate on a VI+ schedule.

[1]  M. Cole Response-rate differences in variable-interval and variable-ratio schedules: An old problem revisited. , 1994, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  W M Baum,et al.  Optimization and the matching law as accounts of instrumental behavior. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  W. Vaughan,et al.  Optimization versus response-strength accounts of behavior. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  J J Pear,et al.  Constituents of response rates. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  P. Reed,et al.  Instrumental responding by rats on free-operant schedules with components that schedule response-dependent reinforcer omission: Implications for optimization theories , 1989 .

[6]  Influence of the cost of responding , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[7]  C. B. Ferster,et al.  Schedules of reinforcement , 1957 .

[8]  G E Zuriff A comparison of variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  P. Reed Multiple determinants of the effects of reinforcement magnitude on free-operant response rates. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  P. Reed Effect of perceived cost on judgments regarding the efficacy of investment , 1999 .

[11]  M Cole,et al.  Molar And Molecular Control In Variable-interval And Variable-ratio Schedules. , 1999, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  R. Church,et al.  SYSTEMATIC EFFECT OF RANDOM ERROR IN THE YOKED CONTROL DESIGN. , 1964, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  A. Silberberg,et al.  Primacy of interresponse-time reinforcement in accounting for rate differences under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules. , 1984 .

[14]  P. Reed,et al.  Instrumental Performance on Negative Schedules , 1991 .

[15]  Dynamical concurrent schedules. , 2003, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  B. A. Matthews,et al.  Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  W M Baum,et al.  The correlation-based law of effect. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  J J McDowell,et al.  Variable-ratio schedules as variable-interval schedules with linear feedback loops. , 1986, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  Free-operant performance on variable interval schedules with a linear feedback loop: no evidence for molar sensitivities in rats. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.