Positional accuracy improvement: a comparative study in Shanghai, China

With the rapid development of geospatial data capture technologies such as the Global Positioning System, more and higher accuracy data are now readily available to upgrade existing spatial datasets having lower accuracy using positional accuracy improvement (PAI) methods. Such methods may not achieve survey-accurate spatial datasets but can contribute to significant improvements in positional accuracy in a cost-effective manner. This article addresses a comparative study on PAI methods with applications to improve the spatial accuracy of the digital cadastral for Shanghai. Four critical issues are investigated: (1) the choice of improvement model in PAI adjustment; five PAI models are presented, namely the translation, scale and translation, similarity, affine, and second-order polynomial models; (2) the choice of estimation method in PAI adjustment; three estimation methods in PAI adjustment are proposed, namely the classical least squares (LS) adjustment, which assumes that only the observation vector contains error, the general least squares (GLS) adjustment, which regards both the ground and map coordinates of control points as observations with errors, and the total least squares (TLS) adjustment, which takes the errors in both the observation vector and the design matrix into account; (3) the impact of the configuration of ground control points (GCPs) on the result of PAI adjustment; 12 scenarios of GCP configurations are tested, including different numbers and distributions of GCPs; and (4) the deformation of geometric shape by the above-mentioned transformation models is presented in terms of area and perimeter. The empirical experiment results for six test blocks in Shanghai demonstrated the following. (1) The translation model hardly improves the positional accuracy because it accounts only for the shift error within digital datasets. The other four models (i.e., the scale and translation, similarity, affine, and second-order polynomial models) significantly improve the positional accuracy, which is assessed at checkpoints (CKPs) by calculating the difference between the updated coordinates transformed from the map coordinates and the surveyed coordinates. On the basis of the refined Akaike information criterion, the two best optimal transformation models for PAI are determined as the scale and translation and affine transformation models. (2) The weighted sum of square errors obtained using the GLS and TLS methods are much less than those obtained using the classical least squares method. The result indicates that both the GLS and TLS estimation methods can achieve greater reliability and accuracy in PAI adjustment. (3) The configuration of GCPs has a considerable effect on the result of PAI adjustment. Thus, an optimal configuration scheme of GCPs is determined to obtain the highest positional accuracy in the study area. (4) Compared with the deformations of geometric shapes caused by the transformation models, the scale and translation model is found to be the best model for the study area.

[1]  N. Sugiura.  Further analysts of the data by akaike' s information criterion and the finite corrections , 1978 .

[2]  Kaichang Di,et al.  Evaluation and Improvement of Geopositioning Accuracy of IKONOS Stereo Imagery , 2005 .

[3]  H. Kang,et al.  Analytical conflation of spatial data from municipal and federal government agencies , 2002 .

[4]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Total least squares problem - computational aspects and analysis , 1991, Frontiers in applied mathematics.

[5]  Di Kaichang,et al.  Geometric Processing of Ikonos Stereo Imagery for Coastal Mapping Applications , 2003 .

[6]  J. Cavanaugh.  Unifying the derivations for the Akaike and corrected Akaike information criteria , 1997 .

[7]  Burkhard Schaffrin,et al.  An algorithmic approach to the total least-squares problem with linear and quadratic constraints , 2009 .

[8]  C. Ghilani,et al.  Adjustment Computations: Statistics and Least Squares in Surveying and GIS , 1987 .

[9]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  An analysis of the total least squares problem , 1980, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[10]  J. Grodecki,et al.  Block Adjustment of High-Resolution Satellite Images Described by Rational Polynomials , 2003 .

[11]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  The element-wise weighted total least-squares problem , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[12]  Yerach Doytsher,et al.  Establishing an urban digital cadastre: analytical reconstruction of parcel boundaries , 2002 .

[13]  Jan Flusser,et al.  Image registration methods: a survey , 2003, Image Vis. Comput..

[14]  W. Shi,et al.  A least squares-based method for adjusting the boundaries of area objects , 2005 .

[15]  H. M. Karara,et al.  Direct Linear Transformation from Comparator Coordinates into Object Space Coordinates in Close-Range Photogrammetry , 2015 .

[16]  Chris Rizos,et al.  Stochastic assessment of GPS carrier phase measurements for precise static relative positioning , 2002 .

[17]  Allison Kealy,et al.  Using Topological Relationships to Inform a Data Integration Process , 2008, Trans. GIS.

[18]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[19]  Alan Saalfeld,et al.  Conflation Automated map compilation , 1988, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Edward M. Mikhail,et al.  Observations And Least Squares , 1983 .

[21]  A. Bannari,et al.  A theoretical review of different mathematical models of geometric corrections applied to remote sensing images , 1995 .

[22]  Burkhard Schaffrin,et al.  A note on Constrained Total Least-Squares estimation , 2006 .

[23]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[24]  Impyeong Lee,et al.  Total Least-Squares (TLS) for geodetic straight-line and plane adjustment , 2006 .

[25]  Najeh Sadiq Tamim.  A methodology to create a digital cadastral overlay through upgrading digitized cadastral data , 1992 .

[26]  C. Fraser,et al.  Bias compensation in rational functions for Ikonos satellite imagery , 2003 .

[27]  X. Tong,et al.  Bias-corrected rational polynomial coefficients for high accuracy geo-positioning of QuickBird stereo imagery , 2010 .

[28]  Robert H. Shumway,et al.  Improved estimators of Kullback-Leibler information for autoregressive model selection in small samples , 1990 .

[29]  Clive S. Fraser,et al.  Digital camera self-calibration , 1997 .

[30]  O. Akyilmaz,et al.  Total Least Squares Solution of Coordinate Transformation , 2007 .

[31]  J. Greenfeld.  Least Squares Weighted Coordinate Transformation Formulas and Their Applications , 1997 .

[32]  Burkhard Schaffrin,et al.  Total Least-Squares regularization of Tykhonov type and an ancient racetrack in Corinth , 2010 .

[33]  Ricardo D. Fierro,et al.  The Total Least Squares Problem: Computational Aspects and Analysis (S. Van Huffel and J. Vandewalle) , 1993, SIAM Rev..

[34]  Karl-Rudolf Koch,et al.  Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models , 1988 .

[35]  Frederick E. Petry,et al.  A Rule-based Approach for the Conflation of Attributed Vector Data , 1998, GeoInformatica.

[36]  Frank Gielsdorf.  Positional Accuracy Improvement A necessary tool for updating and integration of GIS data , 2004 .

[37]  María Luisa Casado,et al.  Some Basic Mathematical Constraints for the Geometric Conflation Problem , 2006 .

[38]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[39]  Y. Felus.  On Linear Transformations of Spatial Data Using the Structured Total Least Norm Principle , 2006 .

[40]  Allison Kealy,et al.  Positional accuracy improvement: lessons learned from regional Victoria, Australia , 2008 .

[41]  Yaron A. Felus,et al.  ON THE POSITIONAL ENHANCEMENT OF DIGITAL CADASTRAL MAPS , 2007 .

[42]  Yerahmiel Doytsher,et al.  Rubber-Sheeting Algorithm for Cadastral Maps , 1995 .

[43]  Allison Kealy,et al.  Improving positional accuracy and preserving topology through spatial data fusion , 2006 .

[44]  C. Tao,et al.  A Comprehensive Study of the Rational Function Model for Photogrammetric Processing , 2001 .

[45]  Burkhard Schaffrin,et al.  On the multivariate total least-squares approach to empirical coordinate transformations. Three algorithms , 2008 .

[46]  Wenzhong Shi,et al.  Introducing scale parameters for adjusting area objects in GIS based on least squares and variance component estimation , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..