Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings--a naturalistic driving study.

The purpose of this field operational test study is to assess visual attention allocation and brake reactions in response to a brake-capacity forward collision warning (B-FCW), which is designed similarly to all forward collision warnings on the market for trucks. Truck drivers' reactions immediately after the warning (threat-period) as well as a few seconds after the warning (post-threat-recovery-period) are analyzed, both with and without taking into consideration the predictability of an event and driver distraction. A B-FCW system interface should immediately direct visual attention toward the threat and allow the driver to make a quick decision about whether or not to brake. To investigate eye movement reactions, we analyzed glances 30s before and 15s after 60 naturally occurring collision warning events. The B-FCW events were extracted from the Volvo euroFOT database, which contains data from 30 Volvo trucks driving for approximately 40000 h for four million kilometers. Statistical analyses show that a B-FCW leads to immediate attention allocation toward the roadway and drivers hit the brake. In addition to this intended effect during the threat-period, a rather unexpected effect within the post-threat-recovery-period was discovered in unpredictable events and events with distracted drivers. A few seconds after a warning is issued, eye movements are directed away from the road toward the warning source in the instrument cluster. This potentially indicates that the driver is seeking to understand the circumstances of the warning. Potential reasons for this are discussed: properties relating to the termination of the warning information, the position of the visual and/or audio warning, the conspicuity of the warning, the duration of the warning, and the modality of the warning. The present results are particularly valuable because all on-market collision warning systems in trucks (and almost all in cars) involve visual warnings positioned in the instrument cluster like the one in this study. Acknowledging the fact that human machine interface (HMI)-design is challenging, the conclusions lead the way toward HMI design recommendations for collision warning systems.

[1]  Julie McClafferty,et al.  Chapter 6 – Naturalistic Driving Studies and Data Coding and Analysis Techniques , 2011 .

[2]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Driver distraction in long-haul truck drivers , 2005 .

[3]  Barry H. Kantowitz,et al.  PERCEPTUAL AND COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[4]  Robert J Carroll,et al.  The development of a naturalistic data collection system to perform critical incident analysis: an investigation of safety and fatigue issues in long-haul trucking. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Neil D. Lerner,et al.  Crash Warning Interface Metrics Final Report , 2011 .

[6]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .

[7]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes , 2005 .

[8]  Trent Victor,et al.  Sweden-Michigan Naturalistic Field Operational Test (SeMiFOT), Phase 1: WP5 Evaluation of Methodology. Final Report , 2010 .

[9]  David Shinar,et al.  Effects of an In-Vehicle Collision Avoidance Warning System on Short- and Long-Term Driving Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Mikael Ljung Aust,et al.  Improving the Evaluation Process for Active Safety Functions , 2012 .

[11]  Dean P Chiang,et al.  On the highway measures of driver glance behavior with an example automobile navigation system. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  John Richardson,et al.  Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  Visual distraction when driving and its influence on driver response to a forward collision warning system , 2011, SICE Annual Conference 2011.

[14]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Human Performance Models and Rear-End Collision Avoidance Algorithms , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Henrik Lind.  An efficient visual forward collision warning display for vehicles , 2007 .

[16]  Y Ian Noy,et al.  Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  Jonathan M. Hankey,et al.  Evaluation of Forward Collision Warning System Visual Alert Candidates and SAE J2400 , 2009 .

[18]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Crash Warning System Interfaces: Human Factors Insights and Lessons Learned , 2007 .

[19]  Ming-Hui Wen,et al.  Comparison of head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD): driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  Yung-Ching Liu,et al.  Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  Dot Hs,et al.  Forward Collision Warning Requirements Project Final Report - Task 1 , 2003 .

[22]  David Shinar,et al.  Imperfect in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid distracted drivers , 2007 .

[23]  Jonathan M Hankey,et al.  A method for evaluating collision avoidance systems using naturalistic driving data. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[26]  David W. Eby,et al.  Naturalistic Observational Field Techniques for Traffic Psychology Research , 2011 .

[27]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Richard J Hanowski,et al.  A descriptive analysis of light vehicle-heavy vehicle interactions using in situ driving data. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Richard J. Hanowski,et al.  Driver Distraction in Commercial Vehicle Operations , 2009 .

[30]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Driver comprehension of multiple haptic seat alerts intended for use in an integrated collision avoidance system , 2011 .

[31]  N D Lerner,et al.  ACOUSTIC LOCALIZATION OF IN-VEHICLE CRASH AVOIDANCE WARNINGS AS A CUE TO HAZARD DIRECTION , 1996 .

[32]  David G. Kidd,et al.  The Effects of Repeated Exposures to Collision Warnings on Drivers' Willingness to Engage in a Distracting Secondary Task , 2010 .

[33]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Evaluation of in-vehicle HMI using occlusion techniques: experimental results and practical implications. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[34]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Driver Reaction Time to Tactile and Auditory Rear-End Collision Warnings While Talking on a Cell Phone , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[35]  Francesco Bella,et al.  A Collision Warning System for rear-end collision: a driving simulator study , 2011 .

[36]  Erik Steinmetz,et al.  Processing of Eye/Head-Tracking Data in Large-Scale Naturalistic Driving Data Sets , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.