Dynamic response of a flexible rectangular underground structure in sand: centrifuge modeling

Abstract Major earthquakes such as Kobe (1995), Kocaeli (1999) and Chi–Chi (Taiwan) have shown that underground structures have suffered significant damage due to dynamic loading. Therefore, recently, much priority has been given to seismic safety of underground structures located in earthquake-prone regions. There is, however, not much experimental research on the dynamic response of buried structures. This research aims to better understand the dynamic behavior of relatively flexible rectangular underground structures embedded in dry sand. To achieve this purpose, a series of dynamic centrifuge tests were conducted on a box-shaped flexible underground structure under harmonic motions with different accelerations and frequencies. Thus, response of soil and buried structure model was examined considering the dynamic soil structure interaction. Accelerometers were placed in the soil and on the buried structure model to evaluate the shear strain and acceleration response. Moreover, a special attempt was made to investigate the racking deformations by installing extensometers inside the tunnel model. Measurements obtained from those extensometers were compared with the predictions of analytical solutions. Results show that, Penzien’s approach gives reasonable estimates of racking deformation for the rectangular shaped flexible underground structure.

[1]  S. P. Gopal Madabhushi,et al.  A model study on the effects of input motion on the seismic behaviour of tunnels , 2011 .

[2]  Francesco Silvestri,et al.  Centrifuge Modeling of Seismic Loading on Tunnels in Sand , 2012 .

[3]  Birger Schmidt,et al.  SEISMIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES , 2001 .

[4]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[5]  Thomas D. O'Rourke,et al.  Earthquake Faulting Effects on Buried Pipelines – Case History and Centrifuge Study , 2010 .

[6]  Antonio Bobet,et al.  A practical iterative procedure to estimate seismic-induced deformations of shallow rectangular structures , 2008 .

[7]  Andrew Schofield,et al.  Cambridge Geotechnical Centrifuge Operations , 1980 .

[8]  Michael J. O'Rourke,et al.  Centrifuge Modeling of Buried Pipelines , 2003 .

[9]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  Experimental study of boundary effects in dynamic centrifuge modelling , 2003 .

[10]  Antonio Bobet,et al.  Analytical solution for deep rectangular structures subjected to far-field shear stresses , 2006 .

[11]  S. P. Gopal Madabhushi,et al.  Effect of depth on seismic response of circular tunnels , 2011 .

[12]  R. N. Taylor,et al.  Geotechnical Centrifuge Technology , 2018 .

[13]  S. P. Gopal Madabhushi,et al.  EFFECT OF DEPTH ON THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SQUARE TUNNELS , 2011 .

[14]  H B Seed,et al.  VOLUME CHANGES IN SANDS DURING CYCLIC LOADING , 1971 .

[15]  Vincent P. Drnevich,et al.  Shear modulus and damping in soils , 1972 .

[16]  Sandra Escoffier,et al.  Using centrifuge tests data to identify the dynamic soil properties: Application to Fontainebleau sand , 2013 .

[17]  William Barclay,et al.  Seismic Design of Tunnels A Simple State-of-the-Art Design Approach , 1993 .

[18]  S. Dashti,et al.  Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction and Lateral Earth Pressures on Buried Reservoir Structures , 2014 .

[19]  Jean Louis Chazelas,et al.  Centrifuge Modeling of Dynamic Behavior of Box Shaped Underground Structures in Sand , 2015 .

[20]  Kohji Tokimatsu,et al.  Simplified procedures for the evaluation of settlements in sands due to earthquake shaking , 1987 .

[21]  Joseph Penzien,et al.  Seismically induced racking of tunnel linings , 2000 .

[22]  Dong-Soo Kim,et al.  Performance of an equivalent shear beam (ESB) model container for dynamic geotechnical centrifuge tests , 2013 .

[23]  A. I. Sofianos,et al.  Seismic behaviour of square lined underground structures , 2006 .

[24]  Luc Thorel,et al.  Influence factors study of cone loading test in the centrifuge , 2010 .

[25]  W. L. Wang,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE IN MOUNTAIN TUNNELS DUE TO THE TAIWAN CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE , 2001 .

[26]  T. Kawabata,et al.  CENTRIFUGAL MODELING OF SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF LARGE-DIAMETER PIPE IN LIQUEFIABLE SOIL , 2003 .

[27]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  Centrifuge cone penetration tests in sand , 1999 .

[28]  N. Yoshida,et al.  Damage to Daikai Subway Station , 1996 .

[29]  I. Ishibashi,et al.  UNIFIED DYNAMIC SHEAR MODULI AND DAMPING RATIOS OF SAND AND CLAY , 1993 .

[30]  Mourad Zeghal,et al.  Analysis of Site Liquefaction Using Earthquake Records , 1994 .

[31]  Robert V. Whitman,et al.  Validation of Centrifuge Model Scaling for Soil Systems via Trapdoor Tests , 2011 .

[32]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  Effect of buried depth and diameter on uplift of underground structures in liquefied soils , 2012 .

[33]  Xiangwu Zeng,et al.  Design and performance of an equivalent-shear-beam container for earthquake centrifuge modelling , 1996 .