Estimating fugl-meyer clinical scores in stroke survivors using wearable sensors

Clinical assessment scales to evaluate motor abilities in stroke survivors could be used to individualize rehabilitation interventions thus maximizing motor gains. Unfortunately, these scales are not widely utilized in clinical practice because their administration is excessively time-consuming. Wearable sensors could be relied upon to address this issue. Sensor data could be unobtrusively gathered during the performance of motor tasks. Features extracted from the sensor data could provide the input to models designed to estimate the severity of motor impairments and functional limitations. In previous work, we showed that wearable sensor data collected during the performance of items of the Wolf Motor Function Test (a clinical scale designed to assess functional capability) can be used to estimate scores derived using the Functional Ability Scale, a clinical scale focused on quality of movement. The purpose of the study herein presented was to investigate whether the same dataset could be used to estimate clinical scores derived using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (a clinical scale designed to assess motor impairments). Our results showed that Fugl-Meyer Assessment Test scores can be estimated by feeding a Random Forest with features derived from wearable sensor data recorded during the performance of as few as a single item of the Wolf Motor Function Test. Estimates achieved using the proposed method were marked by a root mean squared error as low as 4.7 points of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Test scale.

[1]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[3]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Using wearable sensors to measure motor abilities following stroke , 2006, International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN'06).

[4]  P. Stratford,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[5]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Advances in wearable technology and applications in physical medicine and rehabilitation , 2005, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A Novel Approach to Monitor Rehabilitation Outcomes in Stroke Survivors Using Wearable Technology , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  S. Wolf,et al.  Pilot normative database for the Wolf Motor Function Test. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  J. Richards,et al.  Agreement between physiotherapists on quality of movement rated via videotape , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[9]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[10]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Advances in wearable technology for rehabilitation. , 2009, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[11]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[12]  P. Bonato,et al.  Wearable sensors/systems and their impact on biomedical engineering , 2003, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.