Comparison of instruments for geoelectrical soil mapping at the field scale

In precision agriculture geoelectrical methods have shown their capability to detect spatial variation of important physico-chemical soil parameters in an efficient way. Nevertheless, relationships between the electrical parameters (electrical conductivity or resistivity) and other soil properties are not always consistent over different fields. This can, to some extent, be due to the characteristics of instruments used for soil mapping. However, a limited amount of research has addressed this issue. In this study, seven instruments for mobile mapping (continuous geoelectrical measurements) available on the market were tested (ARP 03, CM-138, EM38, EM38-DD, EM38-MK2, OhmMapper and Veris 3100). Instruments were employed on a sandy site in north-east Germany. Measurements were compared to a profile, which has been investigated with a high accuracy reference. Additional investigations were conducted concerning the influences of temperature drift, seasonal variations and soil properties on soil EC. Marked differences between the instruments were found with respect to depth of investigation, accuracy and handling that have to be taken into account when geoelectrical surveys are planned or interpreted. Regarding depth of investigation and robustness of the measurements, ARP 03 and Veris 3100 seem to be the most suitable instruments for precision agriculture.

[1]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  A. Apparao,et al.  Depth Of Investigation In Direct Current Methods , 1971 .

[3]  L. S. Edwards,et al.  A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP , 1977 .

[4]  D. R. Cameron,et al.  Measurement of Apparent Electrical Conductivity of Soils by an Electromagnetic Induction Probe to Aid Salinity Surveys , 1979 .

[5]  J. D. Mcneill.  Electromagnetic Terrain Conduc-tivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers , 1980 .

[6]  I. Baillie,et al.  Booker tropical soil manual. , 1986 .

[7]  I. J. Van Wesenbeeck,et al.  ESTIMATING SPATIAL VARIATIONS OF SOIL WATER CONTENT USING NONCONTACTING ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTIVE METHODS , 1988 .

[8]  A. Tabbagh,et al.  Intérêt de la cartographie de la résistivité électrique pour la connaissance du sol à grande échelle , 1989 .

[9]  J. R. Landon,et al.  Booker Tropical Soil Manual: A Handbook for Soil Survey and Agricultural Land Evaluation in the Tropics and Subtropics , 1991 .

[10]  H. Büning,et al.  Nichtparametrische Statistische Methoden , 1994 .

[11]  3-D Inversion In Subsurface Electrical Surveying—I. Theory , 1994 .

[12]  M. Dabas,et al.  Continuous recording of resistivity with towed arrays for systematic mapping of buried structures at shallow depths , 1994 .

[13]  M. Dabas,et al.  A novel mobile multipole system (MUCEP) for shallow (0–3 m) geoelectrical investigation: the ‘Vol‐de‐canards’ array , 1997 .

[14]  M. Dabas,et al.  Recent developments in shallow‐depth electrical and electrostatic prospecting using mobile arrays , 1998 .

[15]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys , 1999 .

[16]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Practical applications of soil electrical conductivity mapping. , 1999 .

[17]  T. J. Gamey,et al.  EVALUATION OF NEW GEOPHYSICAL TOOLS FOR INVESTIGATION OF A LANDFILL , CAMP ROBERTS , CALIFORNIA , 2000 .

[18]  U. Schmidhalter,et al.  Estimating soil moisture distribution for crop management with capacitance probes, EM-38 and digital terrain analysis , 2001 .

[19]  U. Schmidhalter,et al.  Calibration of electromagnetic induction measurements to survey the spatial variability of soils , 2001 .

[20]  N. Kitchen,et al.  Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture , 2001 .

[21]  Christine M. Anderson-Cook,et al.  Differentiating Soil Types Using Electromagnetic Conductivity and Crop Yield Maps , 2002 .

[22]  M. Dabas,et al.  A comparison of EMI and DC methods used in soil mapping - theoretical considerations for precision agriculture , 2003 .

[23]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Comparison of electromagnetic induction and direct sensing of soil electrical conductivity , 2003 .

[24]  R. Reedy,et al.  Soil water content monitoring using electromagnetic induction , 2003 .

[25]  D. Mulla,et al.  A comparison of different sensors for soil mapping: the ATB case study. , 2004 .

[26]  Margaret A. Oliver,et al.  Variograms of Ancillary Data to Aid Sampling for Soil Surveys , 2003, Precision Agriculture.

[27]  H. Domsch,et al.  Estimation of Soil Textural Features from Soil Electrical Conductivity Recorded Using the EM38 , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[28]  R. J. Lascano,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Variability of Sorghum Grain Yield: Influence of Soil, Water, Pests, and Diseases Relationships , 2002, Precision Agriculture.

[29]  J. Stafford,et al.  Comparison of geoelectrical methods for soil mapping. , 2005 .

[30]  G. Richard,et al.  Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review . , 2005 .

[31]  D. Corwin,et al.  Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture , 2005 .

[32]  Audun Korsaeth,et al.  Soil Apparent Electrical Conductivity (ECa) as a Means of Monitoring Changesin Soil Inorganic N on Heterogeneous Morainic Soils in SE Norway During Two Growing Seasons , 2005, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[33]  Donald G. Bullock,et al.  Improving Map Accuracy of Soil Variables Using Soil Electrical Conductivity as a Covariate , 2005, Precision Agriculture.

[34]  R. M. Lark,et al.  Mapping Potential Crop Management Zones within Fields: Use of Yield-map Series and Patterns of Soil Physical Properties Identified by Electromagnetic Induction Sensing , 2005, Precision Agriculture.

[35]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  Relating apparent electrical conductivity to soil properties across the north-central USA , 2005 .

[36]  D. Robinson,et al.  Apparent soil electrical conductivity mapping as an agricultural management tool in arid zone soils , 2005 .

[37]  M. Meirvenne,et al.  Characterization of nitrogen dynamics in a pasture soil by electromagnetic induction , 2005, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[38]  David Beamish,et al.  Fundamentals of the capacitive resistivity technique , 2006 .

[39]  Dharmendra Saraswat,et al.  Comparison of Electromagnetic Induction, Capacitively-Coupled Resistivity, and Galvanic Contact Resistivity Methods for Soil Electrical Conductivity Measurement , 2006 .

[40]  R. Gebbers,et al.  Der OhmMapper - Geoelektrikkartierung mit kapazitiver Ankopplung , 2007 .

[41]  H. J. Farahani,et al.  Map Quality and Zone Delineation as affected by Width of Parallel Swaths of Mobile Agricultural Sensors , 2007 .