Is biodegradability a desirable attribute for discarded solid waste? Perspectives from a national landfill greenhouse gas inventory model.

There is increasing interest in the use of biodegradable materials because they are believed to be "greener". In a landfill, these materials degrade anaerobically to form methane and carbon dioxide. The fraction of the methane that is collected can be utilized as an energy source and the fraction of the biogenic carbon that does not decompose is stored in the landfill. A landfill life-cycle model was developed to represent the behavior of MSW components and new materials disposed in a landfill representative of the U.S. average with respect to gas collection and utilization over a range of environmental conditions (i.e., arid, moderate wet, and bioreactor). The behavior of materials that biodegrade at relatively fast (food waste), medium (biodegradable polymer) and slow (newsprint and office paper) rates was studied. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyoctanoate) (PHBO) was selected as illustrative for an emerging biodegradable polymer. Global warming potentials (GWP) of 26, 720, -1000, 990, and 1300 kg CO(2)e wet Mg(-1) were estimated for MSW, food waste, newsprint, office paper, and PHBO, respectively in a national average landfill. In a state-of-the-art landfill with gas collection and electricity generation, GWP's of -250, 330, -1400, -96, and -420 kg CO(2)e wet Mg(-1) were estimated for MSW, food waste, newsprint, office paper and PHBO, respectively. Additional simulations showed that for a hypothetical material, a slower biodegradation rate and a lower extent of biodegradation improve the environmental performance of a material in a landfill representative of national average conditions.

[1]  Morton A. Barlaz,et al.  Evaluation of Landfill Gas Decay Constant for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Operated as Bioreactors , 2010, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  Rathin Datta,et al.  Lactic acid: recent advances in products, processes and technologies — a review , 2006 .

[3]  J. Chanton,et al.  Methane oxidation in landfill cover soils, is a 10% default value reasonable? , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[4]  Jeffrey F. Morris,et al.  Bury or burn North America MSW? LCAs provide answers for climate impacts & carbon neutral power potential. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Morton A. Barlaz,et al.  Life-cycle inventory of a modern municipal solid waste landfill , 1999 .

[6]  M. Barlaz,et al.  Anaerobic Biodegradation of Aliphatic Polyesters: Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyoctanoate) and Poly(ε-caprolactone) , 2002 .

[7]  Morton A Barlaz,et al.  Estimation of waste component-specific landfill decay rates using laboratory-scale decomposition data. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Craig H. Benson,et al.  Performance of North American Bioreactor Landfills. II: Chemical and Biological Characteristics , 2010 .

[9]  M A Barlaz,et al.  A Life-Cycle Inventory Model of Municipal Solid Waste Combustion , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[10]  W. Owen,et al.  Fundamentals of Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Sludges , 1986 .

[11]  M. Barlaz,et al.  Observations on the methane oxidation capacity of landfill soils. , 2011, Waste management.

[12]  Morton A. Barlaz,et al.  Composition of Municipal Solid Waste in the United States and Implications for Carbon Sequestration and Methane Yield , 2009 .

[13]  B. Pontin,et al.  Fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change: Key developments in the science of global warming , 2007 .

[14]  Susan Thorneloe,et al.  Is it better to burn or bury waste for clean electricity generation? , 2009, Environmental science & technology.