Analysing Temporal Trends in the Ratios of PM2.5/PM10 in the UK

ABSTRACTThe size of atmospheric Particulate Matter (PM) is important as a determining factor for how long the particle stays in the atmosphere, and where it deposits in the human respiratory tract. Therefore, it is important to analyse PM2.5/PM10 ratios as an indicator of the fine particles and determine how the ratios vary both in space and time. This study uses the most recent 5 years (2010–2014) PM2.5 and PM10 data (µg m–3) from 46 monitoring stations, which are part of the UK Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN). In this paper mostly robust statistics, which are not sensitive to non-normal distributions and to extreme values in both tails of the distributions are applied to assess temporal trends in PM2.5, PM10 and their ratios. PM2.5/PM10 ratios demonstrated considerable temporal and spatial variability in the UK and 5 years median ranged from 0.4 to 0.8, resulting in overall median of 0.65. Theil-Sen temporal trend analysis showed that PM2.5/PM10 ratios have increased at several monitoring sites in the UK despite the fact that both PM2.5 and PM10 levels have predominantly decreased. However, trend in PM2.5/PM10 ratios averaged over the 46 monitoring sites was insignificant. Trends in the ratios of PM2.5/PM10 varied during different seasons: spring showed positive significant trend and winter showed negative significant trend, whereas trends in autumn and summer were insignificant. For further investigations: (a) Trends are adjusted for meteorological effect; (b) The emissions of PM10 and PM2.5 (kilotonnes year–1) and their ratios from 1990 to 2013 are analysed; (c) Temporal trends of the secondary particles (nitrate and sulphate) are analysed from 2000 to 2014; and (d) The diurnal, weekly and annual cycles in the ratios of PM2.5 and PM10 are analysed.

[1]  M. Brauer,et al.  Global Estimates of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth: Development and Application , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Pragmatic mass closure study for PM1.0, PM2.5 and PM10 at roadside, urban background and rural sites , 2008 .

[4]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Primary particle formation from vehicle emissions during exhaust dilution in the roadside atmosphere , 2003 .

[5]  L. Lave,et al.  The health effects of air pollution: a reanalysis. , 1982, Journal of urban economics.

[6]  D. Oderbolz,et al.  One decade of parallel fine (PM 2.5 ) and coarse (PM 10 ???PM 2.5 ) particulate matter measurements in Europe: trends and variability , 2012 .

[7]  J. Ayres,et al.  Health effects of air pollution. , 2001, WHO chronicle.

[8]  Harald Flentje,et al.  A European aerosol phenomenology 3: Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe , 2010 .

[9]  Min Hu,et al.  Regional Integrated Experiments on Air Quality over Pearl River Delta 2004 (PRIDE-PRD2004): Overview , 2008 .

[10]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Pollution: Causes, Effects and Control. , 1984 .

[11]  Karl Ropkins,et al.  openair - An R package for air quality data analysis , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Haibo Chen,et al.  Quantifying temporal trends in ground level ozone concentration in the UK. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  C. Hewitt,et al.  Air pollution in the United Kingdom , 1997 .

[14]  Clemens Reimann,et al.  Statistical data analysis explained : applied environmental statics with R , 2008 .

[15]  R. Harrison,et al.  Size distribution of airborne particles controls outcome of epidemiological studies. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  R. Harrison,et al.  Review: Particle number size distributions from seven major sources and implications for source apportionment studies , 2015 .