The EU floods directive in Sweden: opportunities for integrated and participatory flood risk planning

This study analyses the implementation of the EU Floods Directive in Sweden. The question here centres on the possibilities promoted by the directive for sustainable flood risk management, with an emphasis on integrated and participatory management forms. Key persons are interviewed, using a set of criteria for sustainable river basin management as a theoretical framework. The study shows that work in this area is guided by a wide array of values, and that the involved experts provide a broad knowledge basis for this work. The need for better coordination between authorities, pieces of legislation and policy fields however remains critical while the merits of participatory planning approaches are not yet sufficiently utilised. One of the primary tasks here is to develop a shared understanding of the formal context and roles of the process while also developing forms for effective collaboration both within the new administration and between the administration and other key actors, most importantly the municipalities. The case of Sweden can provide useful insights into this process for other member states.

[1]  Stamatios Christopoulos,et al.  ADVANCING THE GOVERNANCE OF CROSS‐SECTORAL POLICIES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A METAGOVERNANCE PERSPECTIVE , 2012 .

[2]  Thomas Hartmann,et al.  Contesting land policies for space for rivers – rational, viable, and clumsy floodplain management , 2011 .

[3]  Pieter Jong,et al.  Between tradition and innovation: developing Flood Risk Management Plans in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[4]  C. Ansell,et al.  Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[5]  Janet Buttolph Johnson,et al.  Political Science Research Methods , 1986 .

[6]  J R Earle,et al.  Integrating the implementation of the European Union Water Framework Directive and Floods Directive in Ireland. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  Robert Jüpner,et al.  Wer hat was zu tun? Arbeitsteilung bei der Umsetzung der Europäischen HWRM-Richtlinie , 2010 .

[8]  A John Sinclair,et al.  Public Involvement in Environmental Assessment: The Case of the Nonparticipant , 2002, Environmental management.

[9]  Donald Chisholm,et al.  Coordination Without Hierarchy: Informal Structures in Multiorganizational Systems , 1992 .

[10]  B. Hedelin,et al.  Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive – prospects for sustainable water planning in Sweden , 2008 .

[11]  John Robinson Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development , 2004 .

[12]  I. Elander Partnerships and urban governance , 2002 .

[13]  Charlotte Wahl,et al.  Swedish municipalities and public participation in the traffic planning process – Where do we stand? , 2013 .

[14]  A. Semadeni-Davies,et al.  Planning for River Induced Floods in Urban Areas , 2007 .

[15]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[16]  Beatrice Hedelin,et al.  Criteria for the assessment of processes for sustainable river basin management and their congruence with the EU Water Framework Directive , 2008 .

[17]  Herwig Unnerstall Legal Framework for Public Participation in Flood Risk Mapping – A Comparative Study of the Responses of Different European Member States to Some Requirements of the Floods Directive , 2010 .

[18]  B. Hedelin Potential Implications of the EU Water Framework Directive in Sweden : A Comparison of the Swedish municipalities' Current Water Planning Regime with the Requirements of the EU's New Water Framework Directive , 2005 .

[19]  P. Driessen,et al.  The flood risk management plan: towards spatial water governance , 2017 .

[20]  B. Hedelin Criteria for the Assessment of Sustainable Water Management , 2007, Environmental management.

[21]  Edward J. Jepson Sustainability and Planning: Diverse Concepts and Close Associations , 2001 .