5-Fluorouracil Augmented Needle Revision of Trabeculectomy: Does the Location of Outflow Resistance Make a Difference?

Purpose:To determine whether the outcome of needle revision of trabeculectomy is influenced by the presumed anatomic location of resistance to aqueous outflow. Design:Retrospective case note review. Participants:Thirty-four eyes of 30 consecutive patients undergoing their first needle revision of trabeculectomy. Methods:We compared 2 types of needle revision: “type-1 needling,” limited to breaking down fibrosis in the subconjuctival-subtenon space, and “type-2 needling,” which additionally involved needling underneath the scleral flap. Main Outcome Measures:Unqualified success was defined as a postneedling intraocular pressure (IOP) >4 mm Hg and ⩽21 mm Hg at the most recent follow-up without further surgery, medications, or repeat needling. Qualified success was defined as a successful patient who required medications or repeat needling. Results:The mean follow-up period was 2.1 ± 0.1 years (range, 1.0 to 3.8 y). Sixteen type-1 and 18 type-2 procedures were performed at a median of 124 days (22 d to 14 y) after trabeculectomy. IOP decreased from a mean of 28.2±1.3 mm Hg (19 to 52 mm Hg) preneedling to 6.7±0.8 mm Hg (2 to 22 mm Hg) on the first postoperative visit and 15.1±0.7 mm Hg (8 to 27 mm Hg) at the most recent follow-up. The overall success rate was 82.4% (47.1% unqualified and a further 35.3% qualified). There was no significant difference in the success rates between type-1 (14/16) and type-2 (14/18) needle revisions (Fisher exact test, P=0.66). Similar proportions of eyes undergoing type-1 and type-2 needling underwent a second needling procedure. There was no significant difference in the IOP reduction between type-1 and type-2 needling (Mann-Whitney U test, P=0.78). Conclusions:Needle revision is an effective technique for trabeculectomy bleb remodeling and can result in a sustained reduction in IOP. The location of the obstruction did not influence outcome, with type-1 and type-2 needle revisions equally likely to succeed.

[1]  R. Feldman,et al.  Needle Revision of Filtering Blebs , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[2]  C. Baudouin,et al.  Filtering blebs and aqueous pathway an immunocytological and in vivo confocal microscopy study. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[3]  P. Carpineto,et al.  Filtering Bleb Functionality: A Clinical, Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[4]  A. Rotchford,et al.  Frequency of bleb manipulations after trabeculectomy surgery , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  A. Wells,et al.  Comparison of two clinical Bleb grading systems. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[6]  M. Moster,et al.  Slit-Lamp Needle Revision of Failed Filtering Blebs Using High-Dose Mitomycin C , 2005, Journal of glaucoma.

[7]  W. Sponsel,et al.  Operative revision of non‐functioning filtering blebs with 5‐fluorouracil to regain intraocular pressure control , 2004, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[8]  P. Khaw,et al.  Needle revision of failing and failed trabeculectomy blebs with adjunctive 5-fluorouracil: survival analysis. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[9]  G. Novack,et al.  Transconjunctival mitomycin-C in needle revisions of failing filtering blebs. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Hawkins,et al.  Predictors for success of needle revision of failing filtration blebs. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[11]  D. Shin,et al.  Risk factors for failure of 5-fluorouracil needling revision for failed conjunctival filtration blebs. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  A. Azuara-Blanco,et al.  Dysfunctional filtering blebs. , 1998, Survey of ophthalmology.

[13]  L. Allen,et al.  The treatment of encapsulated trabeculectomy blebs in an out-patient setting using a needling technique and subconjunctival 5-fluorouracil injection , 1998, Eye.

[14]  C. M. Lederer,et al.  Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using mitomycin C. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[15]  I. Suñer,et al.  Needle elevation of the scleral flap for failing filtration blebs after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  E. V. Van Buskirk.  Five-year follow-up of the Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  M. Juzych,et al.  Needling revision of failed filtering blebs with adjunctive 5-fluorouracil. , 1993, Ophthalmic surgery.

[18]  W. Hodge,et al.  Treatment of encapsulated blebs with 30-gauge needling and injection of low-dose 5-fluorouracil. , 1992, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[19]  W. Gillies,et al.  Restoring the function of the failed bleb. , 1991, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  R. Stamper,et al.  Needle revision with and without 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of failed filtering blebs. , 1990, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  B. Shingleton,et al.  Management of encapsulated filtration blebs. , 1990, Ophthalmology.

[22]  J. Pederson,et al.  Surgical management of encapsulated filtering blebs. , 1985, Ophthalmology.

[23]  J. S. Cohen,et al.  Revision of filtration surgery. , 1977, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  K. Swan.  Reopening of nonfunctioning filters--simplified surgical techniques. , 1975, Transactions. Section on Ophthalmology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

[25]  Horacio Ferrer.  Conjunctival Dialysis: In the Treatment of Glaucoma Recurrent After Sclerectomy , 1941 .