Binaural Loudness Matches in Unilaterally Impaired Listeners

Binaural loudness matching data using a 2IFC adaptive procedure were obtained in high-frequency, unilateral cochlear-impaired listeners. The matches were obtained at frequencies where both ears had similarly normal thresholds, and also at other frequencies where the impaired ear had various degrees of hearing loss. In these listeners, one presumed difference between the ears is the limited or altered spread of excitation in the impaired ear. In agreement with previous studies using other approaches (Hellman, 1974, 1978; Hellman & Meiselman, 1986; Moore, Glasberg, Hess & Birchall, 1985; Schneider & Parker, 1987), the results of the present study suggest that both the range and the slope of loudness growth function are not dependent on the spread of excitation, but instead are related primarily to the degree of threshold elevation at the test frequency. Following this suggestion, a spread-of-excitation-independent model, based upon a group of neurons with the same characteristic frequency (CF) but different thresholds, is proposed to account for loudness growth in both normal and recruitment cases. In particular, it is shown quantitatively that a compressed distribution of thresholds due to threshold elevation may be responsible for loudness recruitment in sensorineural hearing loss.

[1]  S Buus,et al.  Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  Neal F. Viemeister Psychophysical aspects of auditory intensity coding: Neurobiological Bases of Hearing , 1988 .

[3]  E. Fowler,et al.  The diagnosis of diseases of the neural mechanism of hearing by the aid of sounds well above threshold (presidential address) , 1937 .

[4]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  On the Effect of Practice and Motivation on the Threshold of Audibility , 1958 .

[5]  E F Evans,et al.  The sharpening of cochlear frequency selectivity in the normal and abnormal cochlea. , 1975, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[6]  D. P. Phillips Stimulus intensity and loudness recruitment: neural correlates. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  E. F. Evans,et al.  The Dynamic Range Problem: Place and Time Coding at the Level of Cochlear Nerve and Nucleus , 1981 .

[8]  S S Stevens,et al.  Neural events and psychophysical law. , 1971, Science.

[9]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. II. Responses to low-frequency tones and relationship to microphonics and spike initiation in the VIII nerve. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  W Melnick,et al.  American National Standard specifications for audiometers. , 1971, ASHA.

[11]  W Jesteadt,et al.  An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Julius L. Goldstein,et al.  Is the Power Law Simply Related to the Driven Spike Response Rate from the Whole Auditory Nerve , 1974 .

[13]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Auditory intensity discrimination at high frequencies in the presence of noise. , 1983, Science.

[14]  R. Hellman Effect of Spread of Excitation on the Loudness Function at 250 Hz , 1974 .

[15]  D. W. Robinson,et al.  A re-determination of the equal-loudness relations for pure tones , 1956 .

[16]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Phenomenological model for two‐tone suppression , 1976 .

[17]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Peripheral Auditory Processing of Speech Information: Implications from a Physiological Study of Intensity Discrimination , 1987 .

[18]  B C Moore,et al.  Pure-tone intensity discrimination: some experiments relating to the "near-miss" to Weber's law. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  R F Hess,et al.  Effects of flanking noise bands on the rate of growth of loudness of tones in normal and recruiting ears. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Some Factors Affecting the Estimation of Loudness , 1962 .

[21]  E. Owens,et al.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1997 .

[22]  Alexander Joseph Book reviewDischarge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve: Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang, with the assistance of Takeshi Watanabe, Eleanor C. Thomas and Louise F. Clark: Research Monograph no. 35. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965 , 1967 .

[23]  M. Teich,et al.  A neural-counting model incorporating refractoriness and spread of excitation. II. Application to loudness estimation. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  M. Sachs,et al.  Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  S. Parker,et al.  Intensity discrimination and loudness for tones in notched noise , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  On Some Factors Affecting the Estimation of Loudness , 1960 .

[29]  E D Young,et al.  Effects of continuous noise backgrounds on rate response of auditory nerve fibers in cat. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. II. Stereocilia damage and alterations of spontaneous discharge rates , 1984, Hearing Research.

[31]  M. Liberman,et al.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. VIII. Loudness comparisons between different types of stimuli. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  S. Ross,et al.  Matching functions and equal-sensation contours for loudness. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  R A Levine,et al.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. , 1970, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[35]  C. Wier,et al.  A method for relating loudness-matching and intensity-discrimination data. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[36]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Intensity discrimination of noise in the presence of band-reject noise. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  E. Fowler MARKED DEAFENED AREAS IN NORMAL EARS , 1928 .

[38]  Ian M. Winter,et al.  Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range , 1990, Hearing Research.

[39]  S M Khanna,et al.  Histological evaluation of damage in cat cochleas used for measurement of basilar membrane mechanics. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  R P Hellman Dependence of loudness growth on skirts of excitation patterns. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Problems and methods of psychophysics. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. I. Threshold shift and characteristic-frequency shift , 1984, Hearing Research.

[43]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  C. M. Kos,et al.  LXX Clinical Measurements and Implications of Recruitment , 1952 .

[45]  M. Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves , 1984, Hearing Research.

[46]  Raimond L Winslow,et al.  Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle , 1988, Hearing Research.

[47]  B. Moore An introduction to the psychology of hearing, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[48]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Analysis of Some Auditory Characteristics. , 1963 .

[49]  B C Moore,et al.  Intensity discrimination: a severe departure from Weber's law. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  I. Whitfield Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve , 1966 .

[51]  D O Kim,et al.  A population study of auditory-nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats: response to pure tones. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.