Cellular mechanism of reentry induced by a strong electrical stimulus: implications for fibrillation and defibrillation.

The objective of this review article is to describe the graded response hypothesis of reentry induced by a strong single electrical stimulus in the normal canine ventricular myocardium. It is shown that the graded responses (subthreshold depolarization during phase 3 of the action potential) induced at a site distant (S2) from the regular S1--S1 pacing site, propagate slowly over short distances (approximately 5 mm) and initiate a regenerative action potentials in recovered cells near the S1 site. Activation wave then blocks near the S2 site (unidirectional block) but reenters when the S2 site recovers it excitability. Super strong S2 currents do not induce reentry (upper limit of vulnerability). Since similar activation sequence and properties are shown to exist in intact canine hearts during induction of ventricular fibrillation with a similar S2 stimulus, the graded response hypothesis may have relevance to vulnerability to fibrillation. Furthermore, since the upper limit of vulnerability is closely related to defibrillation threshold, the graded response hypothesis might also be relevant to defibrillation mechanism. Other proposed mechanisms of fibrillation and defibrillation (critical point hypothesis, the progressive depolarization hypothesis and the hypothesis of phase singularity of defibrillation failure) are also discussed in this review paper and compared to the graded response hypothesis.

[1]  S M Dillon,et al.  Shock-induced depolarization of refractory myocardium prevents wave-front propagation in defibrillation. , 1996, Circulation research.

[2]  P D Wolf,et al.  Cardiac Potential and Potential Gradient Fields Generated by Single, Combined, and Sequential Shocks During Ventricular Defibrillation , 1992, Circulation.

[3]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Cellular graded responses and ventricular vulnerability to reentry by a premature stimulus in isolated canine ventricle. , 1997, Circulation.

[4]  R E Ideker,et al.  Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability. , 1986, Circulation.

[5]  A. Moss.  Background, outcome, and clinical implications of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  R E Jones,et al.  Improved defibrillator waveform safety factor with biphasic waveforms. , 1983, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  P D Wolf,et al.  The potential gradient field created by epicardial defibrillation electrodes in dogs. , 1986, Circulation.

[8]  P. Tchou,et al.  Transmembrane Voltage Changes Produced by Real and Virtual Electrodes During Monophasic Defibrillation Shock Delivered by an Implantable Electrode , 1997, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  C. Wiggers,et al.  Studies of Ventricular Fibrillation Caused by Electric Shock: , 1930, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[10]  Virtual Electrode Polarization of Ventricular Epicardium During Bipolar Stimulation , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[11]  N. G. Sepulveda,et al.  Current injection into a two-dimensional anisotropic bidomain. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[12]  P. Wolf,et al.  Stimulus-induced critical point. Mechanism for electrical initiation of reentry in normal canine myocardium. , 1989, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[13]  J. Wikswo,et al.  Virtual electrodes in cardiac tissue: a common mechanism for anodal and cathodal stimulation. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[14]  H. Karagueuzian,et al.  Fibrillation and Defibrillation: , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[15]  A. Moss,et al.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  R. Gray,et al.  Shock-induced figure-of-eight reentry in the isolated rabbit heart. , 1999, Circulation research.

[17]  S. Weidmann,et al.  Effect of current flow on the membrane potential of cardiac muscle , 1951, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  I R Efimov,et al.  Virtual electrode-induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure. , 1998, Circulation research.

[19]  P. Wolf,et al.  Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs. , 1993, Circulation research.

[20]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Role of Virtual Electrodes in Arrhythmogenesis: Pinwheel Experiment Revisited , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[21]  Dante R. Chialvo,et al.  Sustained vortex-like waves in normal isolated ventricular muscle. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  I R Efimov,et al.  Virtual electrode-induced reexcitation: A mechanism of defibrillation. , 1999, Circulation research.

[23]  John C. Schuder,et al.  Transthoracic Ventricular Defibrillation with Triangular and Trapezoidal Waveforms , 1966 .

[24]  A Garfinkel,et al.  Spatiotemporal heterogeneity in the induction of ventricular fibrillation by rapid pacing: importance of cardiac restitution properties. , 1999, Circulation research.

[25]  R E Ideker,et al.  Virtual electrode effects in myocardial fibers. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[26]  S. Weidmann.  Electrical constants of trabecular muscle from mammalian heart , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  R E Ideker,et al.  Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation: impact of new experimental defibrillator waveforms. , 1994, American heart journal.

[28]  E. Fain,et al.  The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: reappraisal of the "defibrillation threshold" concept. , 1987, American heart journal.

[29]  W. Krassowska,et al.  Choosing the Optimal Monophasic and Biphasic Waveforms for Ventricular Defibrillation , 1995, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[30]  E. Gang,et al.  Upper limit of vulnerability reliably predicts the defibrillation threshold in humans. , 1994, Circulation.

[31]  Walter E. Garrey.  THE NATURE OF FIBRILLARY CONTRACTION OF THE HEART.—ITS RELATION TO TISSUE MASS AND FORM , 1914 .

[32]  E. Moore,et al.  Initiation and conduction of impulses in partially depolarized cardiac fibers. , 1963, The American journal of physiology.

[33]  A Garfinkel,et al.  Mechanism of acceleration of functional reentry in the ventricle: effects of ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener. , 1999, Circulation.

[34]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of ventricular bipolar electrograms showing double and fractionated potentials. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  C. Y. Kao,et al.  Graded and decremental response in heart muscle fibers. , 1958, The American journal of physiology.

[36]  R Plonsey,et al.  Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings. , 1990, Circulation.

[37]  A. Garfinkel,et al.  Chaos and the transition to ventricular fibrillation: a new approach to antiarrhythmic drug evaluation. , 1999, Circulation.

[38]  P D Wolf,et al.  Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms. , 1987, Circulation.

[39]  H. Karagueuzian,et al.  Current Concepts of Ventricular Defibrillation , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[40]  S M Dillon,et al.  Progressive Depolarization: A Unified Hypothesis for Defibrillation and Fibrillation Induction by Shocks , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[41]  P S Chen,et al.  Effects of myocardial fiber orientation on the electrical induction of ventricular fibrillation. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[42]  W. Krassowska,et al.  The induction of reentry in cardiac tissue. The missing link: How electric fields alter transmembrane potential. , 1998, Chaos.

[43]  D P Zipes,et al.  Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardium. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[44]  R. Mandapati,et al.  Quantification of effects of global ischemia on dynamics of ventricular fibrillation in isolated rabbit heart. , 1998, Circulation.

[45]  A. Winfree.  Electrical instability in cardiac muscle: phase singularities and rotors. , 1989, Journal of theoretical biology.

[46]  P D Wolf,et al.  Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks. , 1986, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[47]  P. Wolf,et al.  Mechanism of Ventricular Vulnerability to Single Premature Stimuli in Open‐Chest Dogs , 1988, Circulation research.