Translating clinical trials to clinical practice: outcomes of men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel and prednisone in and out of clinical trials.

BACKGROUND Multiple factors can influence outcomes of patients receiving identical interventions in clinical trials and in routine practice. Here, we compare outcomes of men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with docetaxel and prednisone in routine practice and in clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed patients with mCRPC treated with docetaxel at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Primary outcomes were overall survival and PSA response rate. Secondary outcomes were reasons for discontinuation and febrile neutropenia. Outcomes were compared for men treated in routine practice and in clinical trials, and with data from the TAX 327 study. RESULTS From 2001 to 2011, 438 men were treated, of whom 357 received 3-weekly docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy: 314 in routine practice and 43 in clinical trials. Trial patients were younger and had better performance status. Median survival was 13.6 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 12.1-15.1 months] in routine practice and 20.4 months (95% CI 17.4-23.4 months, P = 0.007) within clinical trials, compared with 19.3 months (95% CI 17.6-21.3 months, P < 0.001) in the TAX 327 study. PSA response rates were 45%, 54%, and 53%, respectively (P = NS). Reasons for treatment discontinuation were similar although trial patients received more cycles (median: 6 versus 8 versus 9.5, P < 0.001). Rates of febrile neutropenia were 9.6, 0, and 3% (P < 0.001) while rates of death within 30 days of last dose were 4%, 0%, and 3%, respectively (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS Survival of patients with mCRPC treated with docetaxel in routine practice is shorter than for men included in trials and is associated with more toxicity.

[1]  Thierry Gil,et al.  Aflibercept versus placebo in combination with docetaxel and prednisone for treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (VENICE): a phase 3, double-blind randomised trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  E. Antonarakis,et al.  The effect of clinical trial participation versus non‐participation on overall survival in men receiving first‐line docetaxel‐containing chemotherapy for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer , 2012, BJU international.

[3]  Tiffany Shao,et al.  The price we pay for progress: a meta-analysis of harms of newly approved anticancer drugs. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  C. Higano,et al.  SYNERGY: A randomized phase III study comparing first-line docetaxel/prednisone to docetaxel/prednisone plus custirsen in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Benjamin Djulbegovic,et al.  From efficacy to effectiveness in the face of uncertainty: indication creep and prevention creep. , 2011, JAMA.

[6]  Lisa Wang,et al.  Reporting of serious adverse drug reactions of targeted anticancer agents in pivotal phase III clinical trials. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Y. Yen,et al.  A phase II study of the antisense oligonucleotide GTI-2040 plus docetaxel and prednisone as first-line treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer , 2011, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[8]  I. Tannock,et al.  Randomized phase II study of docetaxel and prednisone with or without OGX-011 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  S. Sridhar,et al.  A review of the patterns of docetaxel use for hormone-resistant prostate cancer at the Princess Margaret Hospital. , 2010, Current oncology.

[10]  D. Sargent What constitutes reasonable evidence of efficacy and effectiveness to guide oncology treatment decisions? , 2010, The oncologist.

[11]  C. Chambers,et al.  Efficacy vs. effectiveness — docetaxel and prednisone in hormone refractory prostate cancer , 2008, Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners.

[12]  Susan Halabi,et al.  Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  I. Tannock,et al.  Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer: updated survival in the TAX 327 study. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  M. Takada,et al.  Knowledge of Efficacy of Treatments in Lung Cancer Is Not Enough, Their Clinical Effectiveness Should Also Be Known , 2006, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[15]  I. Tannock,et al.  Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  E. Cook,et al.  Comparison of outcomes in cancer patients treated within and outside clinical trials: conceptual framework and structured review , 2004, The Lancet.

[17]  M. Moore,et al.  Treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer. , 2001, Seminars in urologic oncology.

[18]  S L George,et al.  Reducing patient eligibility criteria in cancer clinical trials. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.