Classification of Vibrio cholerae (Vibrio comma), Including El Tor Vibrios, by Infrasubspecific Characteristics

Feeley, John C. (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.). Classification of Vibrio cholerae (Vibrio comma), including El Tor vibrios, by infrasubspecific characteristics. J. Bacteriol. 89:665–670. 1965.—A study of the properties of 220 serotype O group I vibrios indicated striking similarity in most of their properties. However, by using four tests often applied in the identification of the El Tor vibrio, five types were identified and characterized as follows: type 1 strains, phage IV-sensitive, nonhemolytic by tube and plate methods, unable to agglutinate chicken red cells (CCA), and Voges-Proskauer (VP) negative or weakly positive at 22 C; type 2, same as type 1 except for CCA; type 3, phage IV-resistant, CCA and VP usually positive, and strongly hemolytic by tube and plate methods; type 4, same as type 3, except hemolytic only by plate method unless culture has undergone pronounced rugose variation; and Type 5, same as type 3, except stably nonhemolytic. Type 1 and type 3 strains possess the characteristics usually ascribed to classic cholera vibrios and El Tor vibrios, respectively. Geographical and chronological distribution of the types is discussed. The thesis is presented that it is invalid to recognize two species, V. cholerae and V. eltor, because alleged differences are infrasubspecific. Recognition of a single species, V. cholerae, consisting of several types, is recommended.

[1]  S. T. Cowan,et al.  An electro-taxonomic survey of bacteria. , 1958, Journal of general microbiology.

[2]  W. Burrows,et al.  Studies on immunity to Asiatic cholera. VIII. The virulence of strains of Vibrio cholerae for the mouse. , 1956, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[3]  W. Ewing Enterobacteriaceae. Biochemical Methods for Group Differentiation. , 1960 .

[4]  P. Liu Studies on the hemolysin of Vibrio cholerae. , 1959, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  B. Davis,et al.  The Decarboxylase Reactions of Enterobacteriaceae and their Value in Taxonomy. , 1960 .

[6]  M. Pittman,et al.  Protective activity of cholera vaccines against E1 Tor cholera vibrios. , 1963, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[7]  J. Feeley ISOLATION OF CHOLERA VIBRIOS BY POSITIVE-RECOGNITION PLATING PROCEDURES , 1962, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  S. Tanamal Notes on paracholera in Sulawesi (Celebes). , 1959, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[9]  R. Finkelstein,et al.  Hemagglutination: a Rapid Method for differentiating Vibrio cholerae and El Tor Vibrios. , 1963 .

[10]  O FELSENFELD,et al.  Some observations on the cholera (E1 Tor) epidemic in 1961-62. , 1963, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[11]  C. Roy,et al.  HAEMOLYTIC AND NON-HAEMOLYTIC EL TOR VIBRIOS. , 1963, Annals of biochemistry and experimental medicine.

[12]  M. Pittman,et al.  Studies on the haemolytic activity of El Tor vibrios. , 1963, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[13]  R. Hugh The Proposed Conservation of the Generic Name Vibrio Pacini 1854 and Designation of the Neotype Strain of Vibrio Cholerae Pacini 1854 , 1964 .

[14]  O. Felsenfeld PRESENT STATUS OF THE EL TOR VIBRIO PROBLEM. , 1964, Bacteriological reviews.

[15]  W. Ewing,et al.  The differentiation of Aeromonas and C27 cultures from Enterobacteriaceae , 1960 .

[16]  S. Mukerjee The bacteriophage-susceptibility test in differentiating Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio el tor. , 1963, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.