E-commerce: a new business model for the food supply/demand chain

The use of electronic commerce for quality control and cost cutting efficiencies by the food and agricultural industries in the United States is the focus of this paper. The food industry engages in e-commerce through 1.) Internet shopping for consumers called business-to-consumer (B2C) e-commerce 2.) Business-to-business (B2B) Internet market discovery exchanges used by food suppliers at any point in the supply chain, and 3.) Business-to-business (B2B) relationships that reduce costs and increase efficiencies in the procurement, storage and delivery of food to retail stores or distribution centers. This third use of e-commerce is the most highly developed and widely adopted. It allows retailers to share information about consumers' purchases and preferences with food manufacturers and farmers and for tracking food products' characteristics, source, and movement from production to consumer. This circle of information allows high quality and consistent products to be consumed at lower prices. This paper is about the development of e-commerce in the food industry, the economic concepts and goals that it meets, and the changes it brings to the industry. E-commerce both fosters and demands vertical coordination. It favors consolidation of firms. It changes the business culture from one of adversarial relationships to one of cooperation and trust. It changes the historical supply chain into a supply/demand loop while it lowers the cost of food. Policy issues arise around monopoly power, privacy, a diminution of variety, and the demise of small, undercapitalized firms.

[1]  M. Fisher,et al.  Rocket-Science Retailing Is Almost Here: Are You Ready? , 2000 .

[2]  Jean D. Kinsey,et al.  Information technology in the retail food industry , 2000 .

[3]  Michael Barrow,et al.  Efficiency Measurement in the Public Sector: An Appraisal , 1989 .

[4]  R. Gulati,et al.  Get the Right Mix of Bricks and Clicks , 2000 .

[5]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[6]  THE SUPERMARKET INDUSTRY AT THE START OF THE 21st CENTURY: KEY FINDINGS FROM THE 2000 SUPERMARKET PANEL , 2001 .

[7]  Arie Segev,et al.  Optimal Design of Internet-Based Auctions , 2001, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[8]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK water utilities: Water distribution , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[10]  Jonathan M. Seltzer,et al.  The 2003 Supermarket Panel Annual Report , 2000 .

[11]  Stephen E. Margolis,et al.  Network externality : an uncommon tragedy , 1994 .

[12]  John J. Pigram Economic Instruments in the Management of Australia's Water Resources: A Critical View , 1999 .

[13]  R. King,et al.  Vertical Coordination and the Design Process for Supply Chains to Ensure Food Quality , 2002 .

[14]  David D. VanHoose E-Commerce Economics , 2002 .

[15]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[16]  R. Wise,et al.  Beyond the exchange--the future of B2B. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[17]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  Supermarkets Transformed: Understanding Organizational and Technological Innovations. , 1994 .

[18]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization , 1994 .

[19]  正弘 中舘 OECD (経済開発協力機構) : Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development , 1991 .

[20]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Adoption of network technologies in oligopolies , 1998 .

[21]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  DEA and its use in the regulation of water companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..