Biofilm formation on surface characterized micro-implants for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics.

Micro-implants are increasingly popular in clinical orthodontics to effect skeletal anchorage. However, biofilm formation on their surfaces and subsequent infection of peri-implant tissues can result in either exfoliation or surgical removal of these devices. The present study aimed to assess biofilm formation on five commercially available, surface characterized micro-implant systems in vitro. The elemental surface compositions of as-received and autoclave-sterilized micro-implants were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. High carbon contamination was detected on the oxide surfaces, along with traces of inorganic elements (Ca, Cu, Cr, Pb, Zn, and P) which disappeared after Ar(+) ion sputtering. The mean surface roughnesses (R(a)) were around 182nm for titanium micro-implants, and 69nm for stainless steel micro-implants, as measured by atomic force microscopy. Scanning electron microscopy revealed different surface topographies between manufacturers, varying from typical machined grooves to structural defects like pores and pits. Overnight biofilms were grown on micro-implant surfaces by immersion in pooled human whole saliva. Biofilms on micro-implants treated with chlorhexidine and fluoride mouthrinses contained comparable numbers of viable organisms, but significantly less than did untreated micro-implants. Comparison of different implant systems using multiple linear regression analysis indicated that biofilm formation was governed by roughness of the implant surface and the prevalence of carbon- and oxygen-rich components.

[1]  H. Birkedal‐Hansen Biological mechanisms of tooth movement and craniofacial adaptation , 1993 .

[2]  R. Greef,et al.  An ellipsometric study of the growth and open-circuit dissolution of the anodic oxide film on titanium , 1989 .

[3]  H C van der Mei,et al.  Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions--its mechanisms and methods for study. , 1999, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[4]  E. Veerman,et al.  The Effects of Histatin-derived Basic Antimicrobial Peptides on Oral Biofilms , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[5]  W. Mittelmeier,et al.  A novel antibacterial titania coating: Metal ion toxicity and in vitro surface colonization , 2005, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[6]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[7]  B. Kasemo,et al.  2. The Biomaterial-Tissue Interface and Its Analogues in Surface Science and Technology , 1991 .

[8]  J. Pireaux,et al.  Analysis of titanium dental implants after failure of osseointegration: combined histological, electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy approach. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  R. Weiger,et al.  Deposition and retention of vital and dead Streptococcus sanguinis cells on glass surfaces in a flow-chamber system. , 1999, Archives of oral biology.

[10]  M. Quirynen,et al.  The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  Dirk Wiechmann,et al.  Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  M. Yoshinari,et al.  Influence of surface modifications to titanium on antibacterial activity in vitro. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[13]  J. Tenovuo,et al.  Antimicrobial function of human saliva--how important is it for oral health? , 1998, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[14]  B Melsen,et al.  Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. , 1998, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[15]  D. Devilliers,et al.  Structure and composition of passive titanium oxide films , 1997 .

[16]  G. J. Verkerke,et al.  Biofilm formation in vivo on perfluoro-alkylsiloxane-modified voice prostheses. , 1999, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[17]  H. Busscher,et al.  Early biofilm formation and the effects of antimicrobial agents on orthodontic bonding materials in a parallel plate flow chamber. , 2006, European journal of orthodontics.

[18]  S. Nyman,et al.  Clinical and microbiologic findings that may contribute to dental implant failure. , 1990, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[19]  G. N. Raikar,et al.  Effect of surface treatment on unalloyed titanium implants: spectroscopic analyses. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  Jae-Hyun Sung,et al.  Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage. , 2003, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[21]  A. Ameen.,et al.  The surface analysis of implant materials. 1. The surface composition of a titanium dental implant material. , 1993, Clinical oral implants research.

[22]  Jukka Lausmaa Surface spectroscopic characterization of titanium implant materials , 1996 .

[23]  M. Textor,et al.  Comparative investigation of the surface properties of commercial titanium dental implants. Part I: chemical composition , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[24]  J. T. ten Cate,et al.  Procedures for Establishing Efficacy of Antimicrobial Agents for Chemotherapeutic Caries Prevention , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[25]  S. Mishra,et al.  Surface characterization of titanium-based implant materials. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[26]  D. J. White,et al.  A method to study sustained antimicrobial activity of rinse and dentifrice components on biofilm viability in vivo. , 2006, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[27]  C. Jones Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? , 1997, Periodontology 2000.

[28]  R Kanomi,et al.  Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. , 1997, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[29]  J. Keller,et al.  Effects of multiple sterilization on surface characteristics and in vitro biologic responses to titanium. , 1996, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[30]  R. Weiger,et al.  Plaque bacteria counts and vitality during chlorhexidine, meridol and listerine mouthrinses. , 1995, European journal of oral sciences.

[31]  Håkan Mattsson,et al.  Surface spectroscopic characterization of titanium implant materials , 1990 .

[32]  N. Lang,et al.  Antimicrobial treatment of peri-implant diseases. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[33]  Hyo-sang Park,et al.  Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[34]  Peter Diedrich,et al.  Clinical Suitability of Titanium Microscrews for Orthodontic Anchorage—Preliminary Experiences , 2004, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[35]  S. Fare',et al.  The effect of surface roughness on early in vivo plaque colonization on titanium. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[36]  E. Hellwig,et al.  Effect of two antimicrobial agents on early in situ biofilm formation. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[37]  Y Shibasaki,et al.  A clinical and histological evaluation of titanium mini-implants as anchors for orthodontic intrusion in the beagle dog. , 2001, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.

[38]  G. Dahlén,et al.  Effect of titanium on selected oral bacterial species in vitro. , 1995, European journal of oral sciences.

[39]  P. Branemark,et al.  Osseointegration of titanium implants. , 1986, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.